Skip to main content
Log in

Outlier detection in additive manufacturing using novel machine learning algorithm

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The capacity of additive manufacturing (AM) to create products with intricate characteristics has produced its rapid expansion in the manufacturing business and widespread interest from a wide range of other sectors. To ensure that parts made for functional use meet specified standards, especially in terms of quality and dependability, quality management of the AM components has drawn a lot of attention from the industries. Unnecessary porosities have a substantial impact on how well the products manufactured via AM operate mechanically. In order to continue to enhance the standard of the AM components by outlier detection, the quality control procedures are thus necessary. In order to efficiently identify outliers in AM data, this work introduces the binary-weighted sparrow search fine-tuned random forest (BSS-RF) method. The binary-weighted sparrow search optimization (BSSO) method is proposed to optimize the RF’s performance in order to increase the detection accuracy. To remove the noisy data, raw data samples are enhanced using the normalization procedure. The important features are extracted using quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA). Finally, the suggested strategy is used to identify abnormal occurrences. The efficacy of the suggested approach is supported by experimental data. The suggested approach can be used in various industrial sectors, including electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, and medical engineering. We intend to create an interactive outlier identification system that is based on the suggested technique for real-time outlier identification and fault forecasting in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Algorithm 1:
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Vishwakarma GK, Paul C, Elsawah AM (2020) An algorithm for outlier detection in a time series model using backpropagation neural network. J King Saud Univ-Sci 32(8):3328–3336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jin Z, Zhang Z, Demir K, Gu GX (2020) Machine learning for advanced additive manufacturing. Matter 3(5):1541–1556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao X, Rosen DW (2017) A data mining approach in real-time measurement for polymer additive manufacturing process with exposure controlled projection lithography. J Manuf Syst 43:271–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartlett JL, Jarama A, Jones J, Li X (2020) Prediction of microstructural defects in additive manufacturing from powder bed quality using digital image correlation. Mater Sci Eng, A 794:140002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bose S, Pal A, SahaRay R, Nayak J (2015) Generalized quadratic discriminant analysis. Pattern Recogn 48(8):2676–2684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Charalampous P, Kostavelis I, Kopsacheilis C, Tzovaras D (2021) Vision-based real-time monitoring of extrusion additive manufacturing processes for automatic manufacturing error detection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 115:3859–3872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li R, Jin M, Paquit VC (2021) Geometrical defect detection for additive manufacturing with machine learning models. Mater Des 206:109726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gunasegaram DR, Murphy AB, Matthews MJ, DebRoy T (2021) The case for digital twins in metal additive manufacturing. J Phys Mater 4(4):040401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu C, Kong Z, Babu S, Joslin C, Ferguson J (2021) An integrated manifold learning approach for high-dimensional data feature extractions and its applications to online process monitoring of additive manufacturing. IISE Transactions 53(11):1215–1230

    Google Scholar 

  10. AbouelNour Y, Gupta N (2022) In-situ monitoring of sub-surface and internal defects in additive manufacturing: a review. Mater Des 111063

  11. Bhatt PM, Kulkarni A, Kanyuck A, Malhan RK, Santos LS, Thakar S, Bruck HA, Gupta SK (2022) Automated process planning for conformal wire arc additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–26

  12. Mahmoud D, Magolon M, Boer J, Elbestawi MA, Mohammadi MG (2021) Applications of machine learning in process monitoring and controls of L-PBF additive manufacturing: a review. Appl Sci 11(24):11910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qi X, Chen G, Li Y, Cheng X, Li C (2019) Applying neural-network-based machine learning to additive manufacturing: current applications, challenges, and future perspectives. Engineering 5(4):721–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Superville C, Mehrez A, Shafti F, Harrast S, Hayes G, McGilsky DE, Samanta S, Neves J (2014) Outlier detection in autocorrelated manufacturing processes. Int J Qual Product Manag 11(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alhwarin F, Ferrein A, Gebhardt A, Kallweit S, Scholl I, Tedjasukmana O (2015). Improving additive manufacturing by image processing and robotic milling. In 2015 IEEE Int.

  16. Rivet I, Dialami N, Cervera M, Chiumenti M, Valverde Q (2023) Mechanical analysis and optimized performance of G-Code driven material extrusion components. Addit Manuf 61:103348

    Google Scholar 

  17. Davis IVLA, Donnal JS, Kutzer MD (2020) November. Tracking additive manufacturing using machine vision. In 2020 IEEE 10th International Conference Nanomaterials: Applications & Properties (NAP) (pp. 02SAMA22–1). IEEE.

  18. Afarani HT, Moser NH, Garboczi EJ, Esfahani EN, Biernacki JJ (2022) Print fidelity metrics for additive manufacturing of cement-based materials. Addit Manuf 55:102784

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mac G, Mandal M, Rastogi A, Gailani G, Pearce H, Gupta N (2022) Application of micro-computed tomography for authentication of 3D printed composite parts. Addit Manuf Lett 3:100104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhan Z, Li H (2021) Machine learning based fatigue life prediction with effects of additive manufacturing process parameters for printed SS 316L. Int J Fatigue 142:105941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yarahmadi AM, Breuß M, Hartmann C (2022) September. Long short-term memory neural network for temperature prediction in laser powder bed additive manufacturing. In Intelligent Systems and Applications: Proceedings of the 2022 Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys) Volume 3 (pp. 119–132). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  22. Shen W, Zhang X, Jiang X, Yeh LH, Zhang Z, Li Q, Li B, Qin H (2021) Surface extraction from micro-computed tomography data for additive manufacturing. Procedia Manuf 53:568–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zeiser A, Özcan B, Kracke C, van Stein B, Bäck T (2023) A data-centric approach to anomaly detection in layer-based additive manufacturing. at-Automatisierungstechnik, 71(1):81–89

  24. Li W, Zhang H, Wang G, Xiong G, Zhao M, Li G, Li R (2023) Deep learning based online metallic surface defect detection method for wire and arc additive manufacturing. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 80:102470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lu L, Hou J, Yuan S, Yao X, Li Y, Zhu J (2023) Deep learning-assisted real-time defect detection and closed-loop adjustment for additive manufacturing of continuous fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 79:102431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nguyen NV, Hum AJW, Do T, Tran T (2023) Semi-supervised machine learning of optical in-situ monitoring data for anomaly detection in laser powder bed fusion. Virtual Phys Prototyp 18(1):e2129396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lyu J, Akhavan J, Manoochehri S (2022) Image-based dataset of artifact surfaces fabricated by additive manufacturing with applications in machine learning. Data Brief 41:107852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shevchik SA, Kenel C, Leinenbach C, Wasmer K (2018) Acoustic emission for in situ quality monitoring in additive manufacturing using spectral convolutional neural networks. Addit Manuf 21:598–604

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang C, Tan XP, Tor SB, Lim CS (2020) Machine learning in additive manufacturing: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Addit Manuf 36:101538

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li Z, Li J, Wang Y, Wang K (2019) A deep learning approach for anomaly detection based on SAE and LSTM in mechanical equipment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103:499–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiranjit Dutta.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dutta, C., Nagarajan, N., Adhoni, Z.A. et al. Outlier detection in additive manufacturing using novel machine learning algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12798-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12798-9

Keywords

Navigation