Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of laser shock dynamic compaction with quasi-static compaction

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By combining the distinctive advantage of the pulsed laser with a high strain rate, this study conducts dynamic compaction experiments with high-strain rate laser shock and quasi-static compaction with a low strain rate on aluminum-based composite powder (Wp/Al) and analyzes the effects of pressing pressure and Wp content on the relative density, surface microstructure, demolding pressure, radial rebound, and mechanical properties of Al-based composite (Wp/Al) compacts under the two modes of action. The shock wave propagation process, densification process, and adiabatic temperature rise in the pressed billet at high strain rates due to laser shock are analyzed in combination with 2D MPFEM. Results show that the relative density of the billets decreases as the Wp particle content increases and that the relative density of the billets obtained with high-strain rate laser shock dynamic compaction is 97.62%, which is up to 2.9% higher than that of quasi-static compaction with low strain rate, the demolding pressure decreases by up to 1.56 times, and the hardness increases by up to 13.5%. The hard particles Wp are evenly distributed on the surface of the billet, and no significant aggregation of hard particles is observed. The 2D MPFEM reveals that the speed between particles within the powder at the beginning of the pressing reaches the minimum collision speed of welding, which is beneficial to the particles to achieve improved adhesion; laser high-speed impact under the particles due to inertial effects produces severe plastic deformation, which in turn improves the formability of the powder; in the process of laser shock the temperature at the edge of the particles is greater than the temperature inside the particles, and the temperature near the upper impactor is higher. In addition, the results of the simulation study are compared with the experiments and are found to be remarkably consistent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yan Z, Chen F, Cai Y (2011) High-velocity compaction of titanium powder and process characterization. Powder Technol 208:596–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2010.12.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eriksson M, Andersson M, Adolfsson E, Carlström E (2013) Titanium–hydroxyapatite composite biomaterial for dental implants. Powder Metall 49:70–77. https://doi.org/10.1179/174329006x94591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yim D, Kim W, Praveen S, Jang MJ, Bae JW, Moon J, Kim E, Hong SJ, Kim HS (2017) Shock wave compaction and sintering of mechanically alloyed CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloy powders. Mater Sci Eng A 708:291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.09.132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li H, Yin HQ, Khan DF, Cao HQ, Abideen Z, Qu XH (2014) High velocity compaction of 09Al2O3/Cu composite powder. Mater Des 57:546–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang H, Zhang L, Dong G, Liu Z, Qin M, Qu X (2016) Effects of warm die on high velocity compaction behaviour and mechanical properties of iron based PM alloy. Powder Metall 59:100–106. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743290115y.0000000019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khan DF, Yin H, Li H, Qu X, Khan M, Ali S, Iqbal MZ (2013) Compaction of Ti–6Al–4V powder using high velocity compaction technique. Mater Des 50:479–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yan ZQ, Chen F, Cai YX, Yin J (2013) Influence of particle size on property of Ti–6Al–4V alloy prepared by high-velocity compaction. T Nonferr Metal Soc 23:361–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1003-6326(13)62470-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou J, Zhu CY, Zhang W, Ai WT, Zhang XJ, Liu K (2020) Experimental and 3D MPFEM simulation study on the green density of Ti–6Al–4V powder compact during uniaxial high velocity compaction. J Alloys Compd 817:153–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cui JJ, Huang XS, Dong DY, Li GY (2020) Effect of discharge energy of magnetic pulse compaction on the powder compaction characteristics and spring back behavior of copper compacts. Met Mater Int 27:3385–3397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00698-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bayle JP, Jorion F (2012) High velocity compaction: comparison with conventional compaction for new press development in hot cell pellet manufacturing. Procedia Chemistry 7:431–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proche.2012.10.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yi M-J, Yin H-Q, Wang J-Z, Yuan X-J, Qu X-H (2009) Comparative research on high-velocity compaction and conventional rigid die compaction. Front Mater Sci China 33:447–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-009-0057-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dong DY, Huang XS, Li GY, Cui JJ (2020) Study on mechanical characteristics, microstructure and equation of copper powder compaction based on electromagnetic compaction. Mater. Chem. Phys. 253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123449

  13. Dong DY, Huang XS, Cui JJ, Li GY, Jiang H (2020) Effect of aspect ratio on the compaction characteristics and micromorphology of copper powders by magnetic pulse compaction. Powder Technol 31:4354–4364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2020.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Atrian A, Majzoobi GH, Enayati MH, Bakhtiari H (2014) Mechanical and microstructural characterization of Al7075/SiC nanocomposites fabricated by dynamic compaction. Int J Miner Metall Mater 21:295–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-014-0908-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharma AD, Sharma AK, Thakur N (2012) Crystallographic and morphological characteristics of explosively compacted copper under various detonation velocities. Philos Mag 92:2108–2116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2012.669057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang X, Hou X, Zhang D, Gong Q, Ma Y, Shen Z, Liu H (2022) Research on warm laser shock sheet micro-forging. J Manuf Processes 84:1162–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hou X, Ma Y, Wang X, Shen W, Cui M, Liu H (2023) Size effect of laser shock sheet bulk microforging. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 128:2719–2737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12094-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yan Z, Ma Y, Liu H, Wang X (2023) Investigation on formability and mechanism in laser shock hydraulic warm free-bulging of AZ31B magnesium alloy foils. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 126:505–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11143-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng C, Zhang X, Liu Z, Ji Z, Yu X, Song L (2018) Investigation on initial grain size and laser power density effects in laser shock bulging of copper foil. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:1483–1496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1722-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ni P, Liu HX, Dong Z, Ma YJ, Wang X (2022) Laser shock dynamic compaction of aluminum powder. J Manuf Processes 77:694–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.03.056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang T, Liu H, Dong Z, Ma Y, Sun W, Cui M, Wang X (2023) Laser shock dynamic compaction of tungsten carbide reinforced-aluminum matrix (WCp/Al) composites, J Alloys Compd. 949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169829

  22. Dong Z, Liu HX, Wang T, Ma YJ, Wang X (2022) Three-dimensional multiparticle finite element simulation of dynamic compaction of copper powder by laser shock. Powder Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Han P, An XZ, Wang DF, Fu H, Yang XH, Zhang H, Zou ZS (2018) MPFEM simulation of compaction densification behavior of Fe-Al composite powders with different size ratios. J Alloys Compd 741:473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lucht T (2009) Finite element analysis of three dimensional crack growth by the use of a boundary element sub model. Eng Fract Mech 76:2148–2162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fabbro R, Fournier J, Ballard P, Devaux D, Virmont J (1990) Physical study of laser-produced plasma in confined geometry. J Appl Phys 68:775–784. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.346783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hughes TJR, Liu WK, Zimmermann TK (1981) Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows. Meth Appl Mech Eng 29:329–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(81)90049-9

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Pagounis E, Lindroos VK (1998) Processing and properties of particulate reinforced steel matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A 246:221–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00710-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sethi G, Myers NS, German RM (2013) An overview of dynamic compaction in powder metallurgy. Int Mater Rev 53:219–234. https://doi.org/10.1179/174328008x309690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nieh TG, Luo P, Nellis W, Lesure D, Benson D (1996) Dynamic compaction of aluminum nanocrystals. Acta Mater 44:3781–3788. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-6454(96)83816-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li XJ, Yang WB, Xi JY, Dong SH, Sun M (1999) The lower limit of explosive welding parameter window for bimetal. ExplosMater 28:22–25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work reported in this paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51675243 and No. 52075226).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China

    Tao Wang, Maomao Cui, Zhao Zhang, Huixia Liu, Youjuan Ma, Wenkai Shen & Xiao Wang

Authors
  1. Tao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maomao Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huixia Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Youjuan Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wenkai Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TW: investigation, writing—original draft preparation; MC: validation, methodology; ZZ: conceptualization; HL: writing—review and editing, supervision; YM: formal analysis; WS: resources; XW: validation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huixia Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, T., Cui, M., Zhang, Z. et al. Comparison of laser shock dynamic compaction with quasi-static compaction. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 130, 1355–1371 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12744-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12744-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation