Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of machining parameters on tool wear, residual stresses, and corrosion resistance after milling super duplex stainless steel UNS S32750

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this work is to study the influence of milling parameters on tool wear, surface residual stress, and corrosion resistance of a UNS S32750 super duplex stainless steel. Face milling tests were carried out varying cutting speed and feed rate both in two levels. Tool wear was monitored until they obtained flank wear values of 0.3 mm and after the tools reached maximum wear, they were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy to identify the wear phenomena. The machining conditions were repeated on new specimens that were subjected to residual stress tests by the blind hole drilling method and corrosion by potentiodynamic polarization. The main results obtained was that the predominant tool wear were flank and notch wear, with predominant wear mechanisms of adhesion and abrasion; lower cutting speeds and feeds provided a greater volume of removed material; when cutting using lower cutting speed, a decrease of 30% on feed per tooth generated an increase about 20% on tool life; the lower cutting conditions yields higher compressive stresses; with the lowest cutting speed and lowest feed, the compressive stress was 800 MPa; while in the highest feed and speed condition, we obtained a tensile stress of 30 MPa; and in the conditions tested, the variation of any cutting parameter did not have a significant influence on the corrosion resistance of the part. Summarizing, the lowest cutting speed at the lowest feed provided superior quality in terms of tool life, surface residual stress, and corrosion resistance for milling UNS S32750 steel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gunn RN (1997) 1 - Developments, grades and specifications. In: Woodhead Publishing Series in Metals and Surface Engineering, Duplex Stainless Steels. Woodhead Publishing, pp 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845698775.1

  2. Nilsson JO (1992) Super duplex stainless steels. Mater Sci Technol 8(8):685–700. https://doi.org/10.1179/mst.1992.8.8.685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davison RM, Redmond JD (1991) A guide to using duplex stainless steels. Mater Des 12(4):187–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3069(91)90162-W. (ISSN 0261-3069)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. IMOA (2014) Practical guidelines for the fabrication of duplex stainless steel, 3rd edn. International Molybdenum Association, London, UK

  5. Salvetr P, Školáková A, Melzer D, Brázda M, Duchoň J, Drahokoupil J, Svora P, Msallamová S, Novák P (2022) Characterization of super duplex stainless steel SAF2507 deposited by directed energy deposition. Mater Sci Eng: A 857:144084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.144084. (ISSN 0921-5093)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu X-H, Song Z-G, Liu L-Z, He J-G, Zheng L (2022) Effect of secondary austenite on fatigue behavior of S32750 super duplex stainless steel. Mater Lett 322:132487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2022.132487. (ISSN 0167-577X)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Amiri E, Ostovan F, Toozandehjani M, Shafiei E, Mohamed IF (2021) Study and selection of most appropriate filler rod for GTAW of S32750 super duplex steel joints: a comprehensive study on microstructural, mechanical and corrosion properties. Mater Chem Phys 270:124839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124839. (ISSN 0254-0584)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ha H-Y, Jang M-H, Lee T-H, Moon J (2015) Understanding the relation between phase fraction and pitting corrosion resistance of UNS S32750 stainless steel. Mater Char 106:338–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2015.06.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Garfias-Mesias LF, Sykes JM, Tuck CDS (1996) The effect of phase compositions on the pitting corrosion of 25 Cr duplex stainless steel in chloride solutions. Corros Sci 38(8):1319–1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938x(96)00022-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ha H-Y, Jang M-H, Lee T-H, Moon J (2014) Interpretation of the relation between ferrite fraction and pitting corrosion resistance of commercial 2205 duplex stainless steel. Corros Sci 89:154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2014.08.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ha H-Y, Lee T-H, Lee C-G, Yoon H (2019) Understanding the relation between pitting corrosion resistance and phase fraction of S32101 duplex stainless steel. Corros Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2019.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou Y, Engelberg DL (2022) Application of bipolar electrochemistry to assess the ambient temperature corrosion resistance of solution annealed type 2205 duplex stainless steel. Mater Chem Phys 275:125183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125183. (ISSN 0254-0584)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Assis KSA, Sousa FVV, Miranda M, Margarit-Mattos ICP, Vivier V, Mattos OR (2012) Assessment of electrochemical methods used on corrosion of superduplex stainless steel. Corros Sci 59:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2012.02.014. (ISSN 0010-938X)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Örnek C, Ahmed A, Engelberg D (2012) Effect of microstructure on atmospheric-induced corrosion of heat-treated grade 2205 and 2507 duplex stainless steels. Eurocorr 2012, Istanbul. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3765.3607

  15. Silva RCC, Nogueira RP, Bastos IN (2011) Tribocorrosion of UNS S32750 in chloride medium: effect of the load level. Electrochim Acta 56(24):8839–8845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2011.07.077. (ISSN 0013-4686)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gowthaman PS, Jeyakumar S, Saravanan BA (2020) Machinability and tool wear mechanism of duplex stainless steel – a review. Mater Today: Proc 26(Part 2):1423–1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.295. (ISSN 2214-7853)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nomani J, Pramanik A, Hilditch T, Littlefair G (2013) Machinability study of first generation duplex (2205), second generation duplex (2507) and austenite stainless steel during drilling process. Wear 304(1–2):20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2013.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gunn RN (1997) 4 - Forming and machining. In: Woodhead Publishing Series in Metals and Surface Engineering, Duplex Stainless Steels. Woodhead Publishing, pp 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845698775.50

  19. Arun KK, Navaneeth VR, Prabhu S, Kumar MR, Giriraj M (2022) Experimental investigation of turning process parameter under several cutting conditions for duplex steels for minimization of cutting temperature. Mater Today: Proc 62(Part 4):1917–1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.447. (ISSN 2214-7853)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. George O, Leo Dev Wins K, Ebenezer Jacob Dhas DS, George P, Beatrice B A (2021) Machinability, weldability and surface treatment studies of SDSS 2507 material-a review. Mater Today: Proc 46(Part 17):7682–7687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. George P, Wins KLD, Dhas DSEJ, George P, Beatrice BA (2021) Effect of machining parameters on cutting force during dry milling of 2205 DSS and 2507 SDSS materials. Mater Today: Proc 47(Part 19):6614–6617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.097. (ISSN 2214-7853)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu CR, Barash MM (1982) Variables governing patterns of mechanical residual stress in a machined surface. ASME J Eng Ind 104(3):257–264. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3185828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saı̈ WB, Salah NB, Lebrun JL (2001) Influence of machining by finishing milling on surface characteristics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(3):443–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(00)00069-9. (ISSN 0890-6955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. SAE (2003) Residual stress measurement by x-ray diffraction: HS-784. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA

  25. Huang K, Yang W (2017) Analytical analysis of the mechanism of effects of machining parameter and tool parameter on residual stress based on multivariable decoupling method. Int J Mech Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.05.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lyon KN, Marrow TJ, Lyon SB (2015) Influence of milling on the development of stress corrosion cracks in austenitic stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol 218:32–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.11.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Saoubi R, Outeiro JC, Changeux B, Lebrun JL, Morão Dias A (1999) Residual stress analysis in orthogonal machining of standard and resulfurized AISI 316L steels. J Mater Process Technol 96(1–3):225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00359-3. (ISSN 0924-0136)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dumas M, Valiorgue F, Van Robaeys A, Rech J (2018) Interaction between a roughing and a finishing operation on the final surface integrity in turning. Procedia CIRP 71:396–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.05.050. (ISSN 2212-8271)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hassiotis ND, Petropoulos GP (2006) Influence of surface roughness on corrosion resistance of turned carbon steel parts. Int J Mach Mach Mater 1(2):202–212

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hassiotis N, Petropoulos G, Hatzopoulos C, Vaxevanidis N (2007) Influence of surface topography on corrosion of stainless steel AISI 304 turned surfaces with different cutting conditions. In Adv Mater Res 18:399–405 (Trans Tech Publications Ltd)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Korkut I, Kasap M, Ciftci I, Seker U (2004) Determination of optimum cutting parameters during machining of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. Mater Des 25(4):303–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2003.10.011. (ISSN 0261-3069)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ciftci I (2006) Machining of austenitic stainless steels using CVD multi-layer coated cemented carbide tools. Tribol Int 39(6):565–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2005.05.005. (ISSN 0301-679X)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Oliveira Junior CA, Diniz AE, Bertazzoli R (2014) Correlating tool wear, surface roughness and corrosion resistance in the turning process of super duplex stainless steel. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 36:775–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-013-0119-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ramkumar KD, Goutham PS, Radhakrishna VS, Tiwari A, Anirudh S (2016) Studies on the structure–property relationships and corrosion behaviour of the activated flux TIG welding of UNS S32750. J Manuf Process 23:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.05.006. (ISSN 1526-6125)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Manufacturing and Materials Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Campinas – UNICAMP CP 6122, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083 970, Brazil

    Daniel Cirillo Marques & Amauri Hassui

  2. School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas, Rua Pedro Zacaria 1300, Limeira, 13484-350, Brazil

    Daniel Iwao Suyama

  3. Center for Engineering, Modeling and Applied Social Sciences, Federal University of ABC, Av. Dos Estados, 5001, Santo André, São Paulo, 09210-580, Brazil

    Renato Altobelli Antunes

Authors
  1. Daniel Cirillo Marques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Iwao Suyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Renato Altobelli Antunes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amauri Hassui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Daniel Cirillo Marques and corrosion tests were performed by Daniel Cirillo Marques and Renato Altobelli Antunes. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Daniel Cirillo Marques and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Cirillo Marques.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marques, D.C., Suyama, D.I., Antunes, R.A. et al. Influence of machining parameters on tool wear, residual stresses, and corrosion resistance after milling super duplex stainless steel UNS S32750. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 129, 801–814 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12328-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12328-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation