Skip to main content
Log in

Posture adjustment method of large aircraft components based on multiple numerical control positioners

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the digital assembly system of large aircraft components (LAC), multiple numerical control positioners (NCPs) are usually used as actuators to adjust the position and posture of LAC to realize the docking of LAC. The posture adjustment mechanism (PAM) composed of multiple NCPs is a redundant actuated parallel mechanism (RAPM). The traditional full position control (FPC) method may lead to interference between NCPs, resulting in the deformation of NCPs and bracket, affecting the service life of the equipment. This paper proposes a posture adjustment method based on hybrid control, which divides the motion axes of the NCPs into the position control axis and the force control axis to avoid the internal force of posture adjustment caused by the cooperative motion error of the NCPs. The driving force of the axis of the RAPM under the same posture adjustment trajectory is uncertain. To further reduce the internal force of posture adjustment, a driving force distribution method based on the dynamic model of PAM is proposed. Then, the principle of selecting the position control axis of the PAM is analyzed, and the optimization strategy of the position control axis based on the condition number of the Jacobian matrix is studied to improve the motion performance of the PAM. Finally, the posture adjustment experiment of LAC is carried out. The results show that the hybrid control method based on the optimum contact force can significantly reduce the interaction force between NCPs. The experimental results of posture adjustment accuracy verification show that the optimization strategy of position control axis makes the accuracy of single posture adjustment meet the requirements of LAC docking, which can effectively improve the docking efficiency of LAC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mei Z, Maropoulos PG (2014) Review of the application of flexible, measurement-assisted assembly technology in aircraft manufacturing. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B: J Eng Manuf 228(10):1185–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu D, Du F (2018) A new method of precise orientation adjustment based on matrix similarity for large-scale component. Assem Autom 38(2):207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen Y, Zhou F, Zhou M, Zhang W, Li X (2020) Pose measurement approach based on two-stage binocular vision for docking large components, Measur Sci Technol 31(12):125002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aba5c7 

  4. Tang W, Li Y, Yu J, Zhang J, Sun Y (2013) A posture evaluation method for aircraft wing based on a simple measurement system. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B: J Eng Manuf 227(4):627–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peng G, Ji M, Xue Y, Sun Y (2021) Development of a novel integrated automated assembly system for large volume components in outdoor environment. Measurement 168:

  6. Li S, Chu W, Huang X (2020) Measurement method of aircraft barycenter based on multi posture. Sens Rev 40(2):217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eastwood SJ, Webb P, McKeown C (2003) The use of the TI2 manufacturing system on a double-curvature aerospace panel. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B: J Eng Manuf 217(6):849–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guo HJ (2011) Key technology of aircraft digital flexible assembly line. Aeronaut Manuf Technol 17:38–43

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rooks B (2001) Automatic wing box assembly developments. Ind Robot 28(4):297–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Webb P, Eastwood S, Jayaweera N, Chen Y (2005) Automated aerostructure assembly. Ind Robot 32(5):383–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li S, Deng Z, Zeng Q, Huang X (2018) A coaxial alignment method for large aircraft component assembly using distributed monocular vision. Assem Autom 38(4):437–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang B, Yao B, Ke Y (2009) A novel posture alignment system for aircraft wing assembly. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 10:1624–1630

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Chakarov D (2004) Study of the antagonistic stiffness of parallel manipulators with actuation redundancy. Mech Mach Theory 39(6):583–601

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee S, Lee J, Yi B, Kim S, Kwak Y (2005) Optimization and experimental verification for the antagonistic stiffness in redundantly actuated mechanisms: a five-bar example. Mechatronics 15(2):213–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Brien JF, Wen JT (1999) Redundant actuation for improving kinematic manipulabi ity. Proc 1999 IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 2:1520–1525

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nahon MA, Angeles J (1989) Force optimization in redundantly-actuated closed kinematic chains. Proc 1989 International Conf Robot Autom 2:951–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar V, Gardner JF (1990) Kinematics of redundantly actuated closed chains. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 6(2):269–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kokkinis T, Millies P (1991) A parallel robot-arm regional structure with actuational redundancy. Mech Mach Theory 26(6):629–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choudhury P, Ghosal A (2000) Singularity and controllability analysis of parallel manipulators and closed-loop mechanisms. Mech Mach Theory 35(10):1455–1479

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Nokleby SB, Fisher R, Podhorodeski RP (2005) Force capabilities of redundantly-actuated parallel manipulators. Mech Mach Theory 40(5):578–599

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang P, Wang Q, Li J, Ke Y, Zhang C (2014) Adjustment optimal trajectory planning of aircraft component based on dynamics model. Acta Aeronaut ET Astronaut Sin 35(9):2672–2682

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guo Z, Jiang J, Ke Y (2009) Design and accuracy for POGO stick with three-axis. J Zhejiang Univ (Eng Sci) 43(9):1649–1654

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xu Y, Yao J, Zhao Y (2012) Inverse dynamics and internal forces of the redundantly actuated parallel manipulators. Mech Mach Theory 51:172–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu Y, H X, Fang W, Li S, (2010) Trajectory planning algorithm based on quaternion for 6-dof aircraft wing automatic position and pose adjustment method. Chin J Aeronaut 23(6):707–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tao J, Luh JYS (1992) Robust position and force control for a system of multiple redundant-robots. Proc 1992 IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 3:2211–2216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim H S (2012) Kinematically redundant parallel haptic device with large workspace. Int J Adv Robot Syst

  27. Tang H, Liang S, Yao J, Guo L, Zhao Y (2011) Hybrid force/position control hardware system design and force servo control realization. Adv Mater Res 317–319:685–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Procházka F, Valáše M, Šika Z (2016) Robust sliding mode control of redundantly actuated parallel mechanisms with respect to geometric imperfections. Multibody Syst Dyn 36(3):221–236

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Yi Y, Chen MJE, Y X, (2006) Fault tolerance of parallel manipulators using task space and kinematic redundancy. IEEE Trans Rob 22(5):1017–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chu W, Huang X (2020) Posture adjustment method for large components of aircraft based on hybrid force-position control. Ind Robot 47(3):381–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang B, Fang Q, Ke Y (2008) Optimal time trajectory planning method for a kind of posture aligning system of large rigid bodies. J Mech Eng 44(8):248–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Walker ID, Freeman RA, Marcus SI (1991) Analysis of motion and internal loading of objects grasped by multiple cooperating manipulators. Int J Robot Res 10(4):396–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Deng Z, Huang X, Li S, Xing H (2019) On-line calibration and uncertainties evaluation of spherical joint positions on large aircraft component for zero-clearance posture alignment. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 56:38–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zeng Q, Li S, Huang X (2021) Configuration optimization of the feature-oriented reference system in large component assembly. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113:673–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Predmore CR (2010) Bundle adjustment of multi-position measurements using the Mahalanobis distance. Precis Eng 34(1):113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dasgupta B, Mruthyunjaya TS (1998) A Newton-Euler formulation for the inverse dynamics of the Stewart platform manipulator. Mech Mach Theory 33(8):1135–1152

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Chu W, Huang X (2022) Self-calibration method of NC positioner for posture adjustment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119:7669–7683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gao J, Zheng R, Zhao Y (2005) Actuating input selection of 5-UPS/PRPU parallel machine tool. Proceedings of the ASME 2005 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference 7:583–587

  39. Kardoš J (2010) Contact force control in the robot end-point. Proc Eng 2(1):563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Wenmin Chu: methodology, simulation, data curation, analysis, experiment approach, writing; Gen Li: validation, supervision, review and editing; Shuanggao Li: experiment platform, editing the manuscript; Xiang Huang: providing the problem and the industrial requirements, project administration.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenmin Chu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All the authors listed approved the publication of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chu, W., Li, G., Li, S. et al. Posture adjustment method of large aircraft components based on multiple numerical control positioners. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 126, 2159–2174 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11262-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11262-y

Keywords

Navigation