Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of the inclined angle of micromilling tool on the fabrication of the microfluidic channel

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Micromilling is a common processing method for fabricating microfluidic chips or other microproducts with high processing accuracy and low cost, which is suitable for mass production. The main concern of micromilling is the surface roughness of the work material. However, only a small range of surface roughness can be obtained in the general study of micromilling by changing the processing parameters, which is very difficult to obtain a specific roughness. In the process of micromilling with end mills, due to the structural characteristics of the tool tip, the inclination angle of the tool has a significant impact on the bottom surface of the machined channels. In this work, the influence of the tool inclination on the surface roughness was studied through the inclined micromilling tests of the poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) surface, and it was proposed to realize the control of the machined surface roughness by inclined micromilling. In addition, a theoretical model considering tool inclination was established to calculate the surface roughness of the machined bottom obtained by inclined micromilling. The experimental results were consistent with the theoretical results under the low speeds. Afterwards, the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was used to replicate the microchannel machined on the PMMA surface, and the microfluidic chips were prepared to control the fluid flow in the channel by adjusting the roughness of the bottom of the channel. Results indicated that the smoother channel flowed first under the same flow pressure. The study offers a new idea of surface roughness control, which can be applied to flow control in microfluidic chips.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dong Z, Yan Y, Peng G, Li C, Geng Y (2023) Effects of sandwiched film thickness and cutting tool water contact angle on the processing outcomes in nanoskiving of nanowires. Mater Des 225:111438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang J, Yan Y, Li C, Geng Y (2023) Material removal mechanism and subsurface characteristics of silicon 3D nanomilling. Int J Mech Sci 242:108020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang J, Lu S, Shi G, Xie W, Geng Y, Wang Z (2023) A study on a hybrid SERS substrates based on arrayed gold nanoparticle/graphene/copper cone cavities fabricated by a conical tip indentation. J Market Res 22:1558–1571

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fang Z, Yan Y, Li Z, Zhang A, Geng Y (2023) Molecular dynamics simulation of the tool geometry effect on nanowire formation behavior during nanoskiving. Mater Des 225:111498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guo M, Tao J, Wu C, Luo C, Lin Z (2023) High-speed grinding fracture mechanism of Cf/SiC composite considering interfacial strength and anisotropy. Ceram Int 49(2):2600–2612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu S, Xiao G, Lin O, He Y, Song S (2023) A new one-step approach for the fabrication of microgrooves on Inconel 718 surface with microporous structure and nanoparticles having ultrahigh adhesion and anisotropic wettability: Laser belt processing. Appl Surf Sci 607:155108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fang F (2022) The three paradigms of manufacturing advancement. J Manuf Syst 63:504–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fang F (2020) Atomic and close-to-atomic scale manufacturing: perspectives and measures. Int J Extreme Manuf 2(3):030201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee J, Lee S, Lee B, Park S, Cho Y, Park Y (2018) Fabrication of microchannels and evaluation of guided vascularization in biomimetic hydrogels. Tissue Eng Regen Med 15(4):403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vecchione R, Pitingolo G, Guarnieri D, Falanga A, Netti P (2016) From square to circular polymeric microchannels by spin coating technology: a low cost platform for endothelial cell culture. Biofabrication 8(2):025005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen C, Yang R (2012) Effects of microchannel geometry on preconcentration intensity in microfluidic chips with straight or convergent-divergent microchannels. Electrophoresis 33(5):751–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Attia U, Marson S, Alcock J (2009) Micro-injection moulding of polymer microfluidic devices. Microfluid Nanofluid 7(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Heckele M, Schomburg W (2004) Review on micro molding of thermoplastic polymers. J Micromech Microeng 14(3):R1–R14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sahli M, Gelin J, Barriere T (2015) Replication of microchannel structures in WC-Co feedstock using elastomeric replica moulds by hot embossing process. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl 55:252–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hwang J, Cho Y, Park M, Kim B (2019) Microchannel fabrication on glass materials for microfluidic devices. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 20(3):479–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Waldbaur A, Rapp H, Lange K, Rapp B (2011) Let there be chip-towards rapid prototyping of microfluidic devices: one-step manufacturing processes. Anal Methods 3(12):2681–2716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li C, Hu Y, Zhang F, Geng Y, Meng B (2023) Molecular dynamics simulation of laser assisted grinding of GaN crystals. Int J Mech Sci 239:107856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ku X, Zhang Z, Liu X, Chen L, Li G (2018) Low-cost rapid prototyping of glass microfluidic devices using a micro-milling technique. Microfluid Nanofluid 22(8):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen X, Shen J, Zhou M (2017) CO2 laser micromachining for rapid fabrication of a four layer poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)-based microfluidic diluter. Laser Eng 38(1–2):57–65

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ogonczyk D, Wegrzyn J, Jankowski P, Dabrowski B, Garstecki P (2010) Bonding of microfluidic devices fabricated in polycarbonate. Lab Chip 10(10):1324–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen X, Shen J (2018) Fabrication and width control of microchannels produced on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) sheets using a CO2 laser. Laser Eng 39(3–6):255–263

    Google Scholar 

  22. El Fissi L, Vandormael D, Francis L (2015) Direct assembly of cyclic olefin copolymer microfluidic devices helped by dry photoresist. Sens Actuators, A 223:76–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Prakash S, Kumar S (2015) Fabrication of microchannels on transparent PMMA using CO2 Laser (10.6 μm) for microfluidic applications: an experimental investigation. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 16(2):361–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Guckenberger D, De Groot T, Wan A, Beebe D, Young E (2015) Micro-milling: a method for ultra-rapid prototyping of plastic microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 15(11):2364–2378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Leclerc C, Williams S, Powe C, Zepp N, Lipworth D, Pensini E, Collier C (2021) Rapid design and prototyping of microfluidic chips via computer numerical control micro-milling and anisotropic shrinking of stressed polystyrene sheets. Microfluid Nanofluid 25(2):12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li C, Piao Y, Zhang F, Zhang Y, Hu Y, Wang Y (2023) Understand anisotropy dependence of damage evolution and material removal during nanoscratch of MgF2 single crystals. Int J Extreme Manuf 5:015101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Qu S, Zhao J, Wang T (2017) Experimental study and machining parameter optimization in milling thin-walled plates based on NSGA-II. Int Adv Manuf Technol 89:2399–2409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Resendiz J, Graham E, Egberts P, Park S (2015) Directional friction surfaces through asymmetrically shaped dimpled surfaces patterned using inclined flat end milling. Tribol Int 91:67–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu H, Cheng P (2003) An experimental study of convective heat transfer in silicon microchannels with different surface conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46(14):2547–2556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Arima Y, Iwata H (2007) Effect of wettability and surface functional groups on protein adsorption and cell adhesion using well-defined mixed self-assembled monolayers. Biomaterials 28(20):3074–3082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao T, Jiang L (2018) Contact angle measurement of natural materials. Colloid Surf B-Biointerfaces 161:324–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Young III (1805) An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 95:65–87

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wenzel R (1936) Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 28(8):988–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cassie A, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40:546–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gang M, Chae K, Kim W, Jung Y, Jun M, Min B (2019) Wettability modification of cyclic olefin copolymer surface and microchannel using micro-milling process. J Manuf Process 37:168–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Song K, Gang M, Jun M, Min B (2017) Cryogenic machining of PDMS fluidic channel using shrinkage compensation and surface roughness control. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 18(12):1711–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial supports of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52222512, 52005134), Self-Planned Task (No. SKLRS202214B) of State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System (HIT), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. HIT.BRET.2022008 and FRFCU5710050521).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yanquan Geng: methodology, validation, investigation, visualization, and writing—original draft. Suyu Zhang: investigation and writing—original draft and editing. Jiqiang Wang: conceptualization and methodology. Guijian Xiao: writing—reviewing and editing. Chen Li: supervision, visualization, and writing—reviewing and editing. Yongda Yan: supervision, visualization, and writing—reviewing and editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chen Li or Yongda Yan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This is not applicable.

Consent to participate

This is not applicable.

Consent to publish

We would like to submit the manuscript entitled “Effect of the inclined angle of micromilling tool on the fabrication of the microfluidic channel,” for your consideration for publication in International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and the manuscript is approved by all authors for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

On behalf of the co-authors we declare that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Geng, Y., Zhang, S., Wang, J. et al. Effect of the inclined angle of micromilling tool on the fabrication of the microfluidic channel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 125, 3069–3079 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10958-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10958-5

Keywords

Navigation