Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization method of spindle speed with the consideration of chatter and forced vibration for five-axis flank milling

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spindle speed optimization is important for the machining industry to improve the material removal rate (MRR). However, low spindle speeds are always used to avoid inaccuracy caused by the chatter and forced vibration. Especially for the five-axis flank milling, the selection of spindle speeds is conservative since the complexity of the tool-workpiece engagement (TWE) and the corresponding dynamics. This paper presents a spindle speed optimization method to improve MRR with the consideration of chatter and forced vibration for five-axis flank milling. Chatter and forced vibration models of five-axis flank milling are developed based on the general cutting dynamics model. The root-mean-square (RMS) values of the forced vibration displacement are employed to evaluate the surface quality. The relationship between the stable spindle speed and the forced vibration reveals that the surface quality is positively associated with the spindle speed in some specific ranges, and MRR is improved by increasing the spindle speed in those ranges without the risk of increasing inaccuracy. The simulation results and experimental work show that the proposed method can be used to optimize spindle speeds for improving MRR without inducing chatter and aggressive forced vibration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Reference

  1. Tlusty J, Zaton W, Ismail F (1983) Stability lobes in milling. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 32:309–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altinta Y, Budak E (1995) Analytical prediction of stability lobes in milling. CIRP Ann 44:357–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Insperger T, Stépán G (2004) Updated semi-discretization method for periodic delay-differential equations with discrete delay. Int J Numer Meth Engng 61:117–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1061

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ding Y, Zhu L, Zhang X, Ding H (2010) A full-discretization method for prediction of milling stability. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50:502–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tlusty J, Polacek M (1963) ) The stability of machine tools against self-excited vibrations in machining, international research in production engineering. Mach Sci Technol 465–474

  6. Tobias SA (1969) Machine tool vibration. Blackie and Sons Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  7. Minis I, Yanushevsky R, Tembo A, Hocken R (1990) Analysis of linear and nonlinear chatter in milling. CIRP Ann 39:459–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61096-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Budak E (1994) The mechanics and dynamics of milling of thin-walled structure. Dissertation, University of British Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  9. Altintas Y (1999) Analytical prediction of stability lobes in ball end milling. J Manuf Sci Eng 121:586–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Altintas Y, Stepan G, Budak E et al (2020) Chatter stability of machining operations. J Manuf Sci Eng 142:1–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li W, Wang L, Yu G (2021) Force-induced deformation prediction and flexible error compensation strategy in flank milling of thin-walled parts. J Mater Process Technol 297:117258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li J, Kilic ZM, Altintas Y (2020) General cutting dynamics model for five-axis ball-end milling operations. J Manuf Sci Eng 142:121003. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Altintas Y, Montgomery D, Budak E (1991) Dynamic peripheral milling of flexible structures. J Manuf Sci Eng 13:229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-6359(91)90138-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Budak E, Altintas Y (1995) Modeling and avoidance of static form errors in peripheral milling of plates. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35:459–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(94)P2628-S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ratchev S, Liu S, Huang W, Becker AA (2004) Milling error prediction and compensation in machining of low-rigidity parts. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1629–1641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Seguy S, Dessein G, Arnaud L (2008) Surface roughness variation of thin wall milling, related to modal interactions. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:261–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Budak E, Tekeli A (2005) Maximizing chatter free material removal rate in milling through optimal selection of axial and radial depth of cut pairs. CIRP Ann 54:353–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60121-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tang A, Liu Z (2009) Three-dimensional stability lobe and maximum material removal rate in end milling of thin-walled plate. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1695-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Svoboda A, Tatar K, Norman P, Bäckström M (2008) Integrated approach for prediction of stability limits for machining with large volumes of material removal. Int J Prod Res 46:3207–3222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540601100924

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang X, Ding H (2013) Note on a novel method for machining parameters optimization in a chatter-free milling process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 72:11–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2013.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ringgaard K, Mohammadi Y, Merrild C et al (2019) Optimization of material removal rate in milling of thin-walled structures using penalty cost function. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 145:103430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2019.103430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Deng C, Feng Y, Miao J et al (2019) Multi-objective machining parameters optimization for chatter-free milling process considering material removal rate and surface location error. IEEE Access 7:183823–183837. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2949423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Okokpujie IP, Ohunakin OS, Bolu CA (2021) Multi-objective optimization of machining factors on surface roughness, material removal rate and cutting force on end-milling using MWCNTs nano-lubricant. Prog Addit Manuf 6:155–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-020-00161-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tunc LT, Zatarain M (2019) Stability optimal selection of stock shape and tool axis in finishing of thin-wall parts. CIRP Ann 68:401–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang X, Pan T, Ma A, Zhao W (2022) High efficiency orientated milling parameter optimization with tool wear monitoring in roughing operation. Mech Syst and Signal Pr 165:108394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang X, Zhao Z, Guo Z, Zhao W (2022) Research on machining parameter optimization in finishing milling with multiple constraints. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part B: J Eng Manuf 236:968–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544054211057989

  27. Nguyen VC, Nguyen TD, Tien DH (2021) Cutting parameter optimization in finishing milling of Ti-6Al-4 V titanium alloy under MQL condition using TOPSIS and ANOVA analysis. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res 11:6775–6780. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.4015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang J, Altintas Y (2013) Generalized kinematics of five-axis serial machines with non-singular tool path generation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 75:119–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2013.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Murray RM, Li Z, Sastry SS (1994) A mathematical introduction to robotic manipulation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Kilic ZM, Altintas Y (2016) Generalized modelling of cutting tool geometries for unified process simulation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 104:14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Eynian M (2010) Chatter stability of turning and milling with process damping. Dissertation, University of British Columbia

  32. Ferry WB, Altintas Y (2008) Virtual five-axis flank milling of jet engine impellers—part I: mechanics of five-axis flank milling. J Manuf Sci Eng 130:011005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2815761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Smith S, Tlusty J (1992) Stabilizing chatter by automatic spindle speed regulation. CIRP Ann 41:433–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61238-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tang Y, Zhang J, Zhang H et al (2022) Generalized equivalent method for dynamics of multipocket thin-walled parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120:2731–2745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08961-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFB1701901) and Shaanxi Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (2019JC08) for Jun Zhang.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y. Tang: methodology, data curation, formal analysis, writing-original draft, review and editing. J. Zhang: conceptualization, supervision, funding acquisition, writing-review and editing. H. Tian: validation, writing-review and editing. H. Liu: writing-review and editing. W. Zhao: conceptualization, supervision, writing-review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The authors consent that the work entitled as “Optimization method of spindle speed with the consideration of chatter and forced vibration for five-axis flank milling” for possible publication in International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The authors certify that this manuscript is original and has not been published in whole or in part nor is it being considered for publication elsewhere.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, Y., Zhang, J., Tian, H. et al. Optimization method of spindle speed with the consideration of chatter and forced vibration for five-axis flank milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 125, 3159–3169 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10894-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10894-4

Keywords

Navigation