Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation on self-sensing monitoring and resonant control of ultrasonic vibration–assisted cutting

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultrasonic elliptical vibration-assisted cutting is a precision machining method that improves the surface quality, reduces burrs, and prolongs the life of the tool. However, during the cutting process, the natural frequency of ultrasonic vibration varies with cutting force and contact conditions, which makes the amplitude of the vibration shrink greatly. Consequently, to resist the influence of cutting loads and unpredictable disturbances in the cutting process, an innovative strategy available to stabilize frequency and amplitude with an electro-mechanical conversion model considering hysteresis compensation was proposed. The proposed model is specially designed for the high-frequency ultrasonic vibration device in the actual machining process. First, to compensate for errors caused by the hysteresis nonlinearity in the ultrasonic vibration processing, a method using the Prandtl-Ishlinskii operator to model the hysteresis effect of the ultrasonic device was proposed. The advantage of this method is that it can quickly adapt to the changes in the hysteresis effect of ultrasonic equipment in real time based on the reversible analytical solution of the Prandtl-Ishlinskii operator. Second, a self-sensing circuit was developed to monitor the cutting process of the ultrasonic vibration cutting actuator in real time, which can measure the electrical signal of the piezoelectric ceramic. With a reference to the piezoelectric hysteresis model, a self-sensing model for calculating the amplitude of ultrasonic vibration devices based on electrical signals in real time was established. Finally, a control system to track and control the frequency and amplitude of the ultrasonic vibration process was developed, and the experimental test and the micro-surface cutting experiment of this control system were carried out. It can be seen from the result that the frequency and amplitude of ultrasonic vibration are more robust by using the self-sensing control system, and a significant reduction of 11.47% in the circumferential length error of the machined workpiece was observed.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feng Y, Hsu F, Lu Y, Lin Y, Lin C, Lin C, Lu Y et al (2021) Force prediction in ultrasonic vibration-assisted milling. Mach Sci Technol 25:307–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2020.1815048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Feng Y, Hsu F, Lu Y, Lin Y, Lin C, Lin C, Lu Y et al (2020) Temperature prediction of ultrasonic vibration-assisted milling. Ultrasonics 108:106212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2020.106212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang J, Cui T, Ge C, Sui Y, Yang H (2016) Review of micro/nano machining by utilizing elliptical vibration cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 106:109–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Feng Y, Hsu F, Lu Y, Lin Y, Lin C, Lin C, Lu Y et al (2020) Tool wear rate prediction in ultrasonic vibration-assisted milling. Mach Sci Technol 24:758–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2020.1752240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Devasia S, Eleftheriou E, Moheimani SR (2007) A survey of control issues in nanopositioning. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 15:802–823. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2007.903345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hubbard NB, Culpepper ML, Howell LL. (2006) Actuators for micropositioners and nanopositioners. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 59. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2345371

  7. Chua ZY, Ahn IH, Moon SK (2017) Process monitoring and inspection systems in metal additive manufacturing: Status and applications. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 4:235–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-017-0029-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Woronko A, Huang J, Altintas Y (2003) Piezoelectric tool actuator for precision machining on conventional CNC turning centers. Precis Eng 27:335–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-6359(03)00040-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shamoto E, Suzuki N, Moriwaki T, Naoi Y (2002) Development of ultrasonic elliptical vibration controller for elliptical vibration cutting. CIRP Ann 51:327–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61528-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yin Z, Fu Y, Xu J, Li H, Chen Y (2017) A novel single driven ultrasonic elliptical vibration cutting device. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bazghaleh M, Grainger S, Mohammadzaheri M, Cazzolato B, Lu T (2013) A digital charge amplifier for hysteresis elimination in piezoelectric actuators. Smart Mater Struct 22:75016. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/7/075016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Newcomb CV, Flinn I (1982) Improving the linearity of piezoelectric ceramic actuators. Electron Lett 18:442–444. https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19820301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Minase J, Lu T, Cazzolato B, Grainger S (2010) A review, supported by experimental results, of voltage, charge and capacitor insertion method for driving piezoelectric actuators. Precision Engineering 34:692–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2010.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ryba Ł, Dokoupil J, Voda A, Besançon G (2017) Adaptive hysteresis compensation on an experimental nanopositioning platform. Int J Control 90:765–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2016.1214874

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanaka Y, Kokubun Y, Yabuno H (2018) Proposition for sensorless self-excitation by a piezoelectric device. J Sound Vib 419:544–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.11.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen L, Yen J, Chen JJ, Kuo F, Chen M, Chen Y, Chung B (2013) Precision tracking of a piezo-driven stage by charge feedback control. Precis Eng 37:793–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2013.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liaw HC, Shirinzadeh B, Smith J (2007) Enhanced sliding mode motion tracking control of piezoelectric actuators. Sens Actuators, A 138:194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2007.04.062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu Z, To S, Li Y, Zhu W, Bian L (2018) External force estimation of a piezo-actuated compliant mechanism based on a fractional order hysteresis model. Mech Syst Signal Process 110:296–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang X, Lu Z, Peng Z, Sui H, Zhang D (2018) Development of a tool-workpiece thermocouple system for comparative study of the cutting temperature when high-speed ultrasonic vibration cutting Ti-6Al-4V alloys with and without cutting fluids. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:237–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1600-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gao J, Caliskan H, Altintas Y (2019) Sensorless control of a three-degree-of-freedom ultrasonic vibration tool holder. Precis Eng 58:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2019.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mansour SZ, Seethaler RJ (2017) Simultaneous displacement and force estimation of piezoelectric stack actuators using charge and voltage measurements. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 22:2619–2624. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2017.2757931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang H, Gao R, Zhang H, Wu C (2022) Effect of mechanical compliance of mounting clamp on electrical properties and vibration response of high-frequency piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer for microelectronic packaging and interconnection. Sensors Actuators A: Phys 335:113374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2022.113374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang J, Feng P, Zhang J, Wang J (2022) Design optimization of ultrasonic vibration cutting tool to generate well-decoupled elliptical trajectory. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119:7199–7214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ge P, Jouaneh M (1996) Tracking control of a piezoceramic actuator. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 4:209–216. https://doi.org/10.1109/87.491195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Viswamurthy SR, Ganguli R (2007) Modeling and compensation of piezoceramic actuator hysteresis for helicopter vibration control. Sens Actuators, A 135:801–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2006.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Al Janaideh M, Rakheja S, Su C (2010) An analytical generalized Prandtl-Ishlinskii model inversion for hysteresis compensation in micropositioning control. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 16:734–744. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2010.2052366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rakotondrabe M (2010) Bouc-Wen modeling and inverse multiplicative structure to compensate hysteresis nonlinearity in piezoelectric actuators. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 8:428–431. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2010.2081979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin C, Lin P (2012) Tracking control of a biaxial piezo-actuated positioning stage using generalized Duhem model. Comput Math Appl 64:766–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu Q (2012) Identification and compensation of piezoelectric hysteresis without modeling hysteresis inverse. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 60:3927–3937. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2012.2206339

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to reviewers for their comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Funding

The work in this paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant Number 51675277 and by the High-Level Talents Project of “Six Talents Summit” in Jiangsu under Grant Number GDZB-011.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Fuhang Yu: hysteresis compensation, experiments, data collection, and manuscript writing. Chen Zhang: methodology, concept, and thought guide. Xiaoming Gan: control mothed and experiments. Xin Hu: experiments and data processing. All authors read and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, F., Zhang, C., Gan, X. et al. Investigation on self-sensing monitoring and resonant control of ultrasonic vibration–assisted cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 125, 2435–2453 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10873-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10873-9

Keywords

Navigation