Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling the effect of electrode morphology on Mg/steel resistance spot welding

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on the effect of electrode morphology on Mg/steel resistance spot welding, and explores the optimal electrode combination. A thermo-electro-mechanical coupled numerical model is developed to analyze the contact area, current density, and heat generation, as well as nugget growth during the welding process. Three configurations are investigated (named domed/domed electrodes, domed/conical electrodes, and conical/conical electrodes). The results show that the contact area between sheets when using conical/conical electrodes decreases at first and then increases, while that of other electrode combinations continuously increases. The current density basically shows an opposite variation tendency to that of the contact area. For conical/conical electrodes, expulsion is prone to occur, the indentation is larger, and the wear of the electrodes is the most serious. The difference of Mg nugget diameters under different electrode morphologies is slight, and the nugget thickness is the largest when using the domed/domed electrode combination. The domed/domed configuration performs the best of the three configurations in this study. However, further research should be conducted to investigate the combined effect of electrode configuration and dimensions on the RSW process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The data sets supporting the results of this paper are included within the paper.

References

  1. Duan R, Luo Z, Li Y, Zhang Y, Liu ZM (2015) Novel postweld heat treatment method for improving mechanical properties of resistance spot weld. Sci Technol Weld Join 20:100–105. https://doi.org/10.1179/1362171814Y.0000000262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang Y, Luo Z, Li Y, Liu Z, Huang Z (2015) Microstructure characterization and tensile properties of Mg/Al dissimilar joints manufactured by thermo-compensated resistance spot welding with Zn interlayer. Mater Des 75:166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chao YJ (2013) Ultimate strength and failure mechanism of resistance spot weld subjected to tensile, shear, or combined tensile/shear loads. ASME J Eng Mater Technol 125:125–132. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1555648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liang SJ, Liu ZY, Wang ED (2008) Microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg–Al–Zn alloy sheet fabricated by cold extrusion. Mater Lett 62:4009–4011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2008.05.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamu GB, Eliezer D, Wagner L (2009) The relation between severe plastic deformation microstructure and corrosion behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy. J Alloys Compd 468(1–2):222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.01.084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang YR, Mo ZH, Feng JC, Zhang ZD (2007) Effect of welding time on microstructure and tensile shear load in resistance spot welded joints of AZ31 Mg alloy. Sci Technol Weld Join 12:641–646. https://doi.org/10.1179/174329307X238380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wahba M, Katayam S (2012) Laser welding of AZ31B magnesium alloy to Zn-coated steel. Mater Des 35:701–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu L, Xiao L, Feng JC, Tian YH, Zhou SQ, Zhou Y (2010) The mechanisms of resistance spot welding of magnesium to steel. Metall Mater Trans A 41A:2651–2661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-010-0333-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu L, Xiao L, Chen DL, Feng JC, Kim S, Zhou Y (2013) Microstructure and fatigue properties of Mg-to-steel dissimilar resistance spot welds. Mater Des 45:336–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu W, Chen DL, Liu L, Mori H, Zhou Y (2012) Microstructure and mechanical properties of weld-bonded and resistance spot welded magnesium-to-steel dissimilar joints. Mater Sci Eng A 537:11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Min D, Yong Z, Jie L (2016) Dissimilar spot welding joints of AZ31-443 ferritic stainless steel with cover plate. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:1539–1545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8078-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Feng YQ, Li Y, Luo Z, Ling ZX, Wang ZM (2016) Resistance spot welding of Mg to electro-galvanized steel with hot-dip galvanized steel interlayer. J Mater Process Technol 236:114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.05.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manladan SM, Yusof F, Ramesh S, Zhang Y, Luo Z, Ling Z (2017) Microstructure and mechanical properties of resistance spot welded in welding-brazing mode and resistance element welded magnesium alloy/austenitic stainless steel joints. J Mater Process Tech 250:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Manladan SM, Zhang Y, Ramesh R, Cai Y, Luo Z, Ao S, Arslan A (2019a) Resistance element weld-bonding and resistance spot weld-bonding of Mg alloy/austenitic stainless steel. J Manuf Process 48:12–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Manladan SM, Zhang Y, Ramesh S, Cai Y, Ao S, Luo Z (2019b) Resistance element welding of magnesium alloy and austenitic stainless steel in three-sheet configurations. J Mater Process Tech 274:116292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang J, Wang HP, Lu F, Carlson BE, Sigler DR (2015) Analysis of Al-steel resistance spot welding process by developing a fully coupled multi-physics simulation model. Inter J Heat Mass Transfer 89:1061–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.05.086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bi J, Song J, Wei Q, Zhang Y, Li Y, Luo Z (2016) Characteristics of shunting in resistance spot welding for dissimilar unequal-thickness aluminum alloys under large thickness ratio. Mater Des 101:226–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Deng L, Li Y, Cai W, Haselhuhn AS, Carlson BE (2020) Simulating thermoelectric effect and its impact on asymmetric weld nugget growth in aluminum resistance spot welding. J Manuf Sci Eng 142(9):091001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ao S, Huang Y, Du H, Luo Z (2021) Fluid flow mode of nugget in magnetically assisted resistance spot welding with unequal thickness plates: modeling and experiments. J Manuf Sci Eng 143(1):011007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Volume 3: Aluminum Alloys and Magnesium Alloys, 2nd Edition (2002) Standards Press of China, Beijing

  21. Yang CL, Wu CS, Lv XQ (2018) Numerical analysis of mass transfer and material mixing in friction stir welding of aluminum/magnesium alloys. J Manuf Process 32:380–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baumer R, Adonyi Y (2009) Transient high-frequency welding simulations of dual-phase steels. Weld J 88:193s–201s

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li YB, Lin ZQ (2007) Numerical analysis of magnetic fluid dynamics behaviors during resistance spot welding. J Appl Phys 101(5):053506. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2472279

  24. Van den Berg GJ (2000) The effect of the non-linear stress–strain behaviour of stainless steels on member capacity. J Constr Steel Res 54:135–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00053-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schenk T, Richardson IM, Kraska M, Ohnimus S (2009) Non-isothermal thermomechanical metallurgical model and its application to welding simulations. Sci Technol Weld Join 14:152–160. https://doi.org/10.1179/136217108X386563

  26. Berger HH (1972) Contact resistance and contact resistivity. J Electrochem Soc 119:507–514. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2404240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Luo Z, Ao SS, Chao YJ, Cui XT, Li Y, Lin Y (2015) Application of pre-heating to improve the consistency and quality in AA5052 resistance spot welding. J Mater Eng Perf 24:3881–3891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-015-1704-x

  28. Tsai CL, Dia WL, Dickinson DW, Papritan JC (1991) Analysis and development of a real-time control methodology in resistance spot welding. Weld J 69:339s–351s

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 52075378) and the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City (no. 18JCQNJC04100).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JG: Investigation, experiment, data analysis, original manuscript writing. JB: Experiment and manuscript revising. SW: Validation and data analysis. YL: Data analysis and manuscript revising. SMM: Manuscript revising. ZL: Supervision and funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhen Luo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Ethics approval was not required for this research.

Consent to participate

All authors in this article have informed consent to participate in this study.

Consent for publication

All authors and their institutions agree to publish this article in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, J., Bi, J., Wang, S. et al. Modeling the effect of electrode morphology on Mg/steel resistance spot welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120, 137–148 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08547-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08547-5

Keywords

Navigation