Skip to main content
Log in

Chip formation in machining of anisotropic plastic materials—a finite element modeling strategy applied to wood

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an FEA modeling strategy for predicting the cutting forces generated during linear wood machining. The objective is to determine both the forces and paths of cracks propagating in elastoplastic and anisotropic materials. The model combines a bilinear representation of the material strain-stress relation and the Hill yield function. The proposed procedure also integrates the displacement extrapolation method to evaluate the stress intensity factors. It establishes the cutting forces from the contact pressures between the tool and the chip. These pressures are determined using the penalty method. The validation phase compares the model predictions with average experimental forces and shows correspondence levels higher than 91% and 92% for low (0.085e10−3 m/s) and high (6.8 m/s) wood-feeding speeds, respectively. The developed model maintains a high precision degree over a large range of feeding-velocity. This study demonstrates that the resistive force between the chip and the tool surface is a function of both the rake angle φ and the coefficient of friction (COF). The friction force prompts a self-energizing effect, which increases the resistive force. On the other hand, larger φ amplitudes reduce this effect. Furthermore, the rake angle φ defines the crack propagation mode. Larger φ amplitudes favor the opening mode, whereas smaller values promote the shear mode. The COF amplitude also influences the surface quality, with larger COFs producing more profound cutting dimples. Thus, reducing the COF should result not only in lower cutting forces but also in a better surface quality of machined parts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All input data considered during the simulations and necessary to reproduce the results are included in Tales 1 to 3, and Fig. 6. Therefore, no additional data is appended.

References

  1. Franz NC (1956) An analysis of the wood cutting process. Dissertation, University of Michigan

  2. Wang X (2000) An Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Machining of Anisotropic Materials Including Wood and a Wood Composite (particleboard). North Carolina State University, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  3. McKenzie WM (1961) Fundamental analysis of the wood cutting process. Dissertation, University of Michigan

  4. Krenke T, Frybort S, Müller U (2018) Cutting force analysis of a linear cutting process of spruce. Wood Mater Sci Eng 13(5):279–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2017.1324916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Merchant ME (1945) Mechanics of the metal cutting process. I. Orthogonal cutting and a type 2 chip. J Appl Phys 16:267–275. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1707586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Atkins T (2009) The science and engineering of cutting: the mechanics and processes of separating, scratching and puncturing biomaterials, metals and non-metals. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-17178-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Uhmeier A, Persson K (1997) Numerical analysis of wood chipping. Holzforschung 51(1):83–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1997.51.1.83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nairn JA (2016) Numerical modelling of orthogonal cutting: application to woodworking with a bench plane. Interf Focus 6:20150110. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2015.0110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Navi P, Rastogi PK, Gresse V, Tolou A (1995) Micromechanics of wood subjected to axial tension. Wood Sci Technol 29:411–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00194199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mackenzie-Helnwein P, Eberhardsteiner J, Mang HA (2003) A multi-surface plasticity model for clear wood and its application to the finite element analysis of structural details. Comput Mech 31:204–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-003-0423-6

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc R Soc Lond A 193(1033):281–297. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1948.0045

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Schniewind AP, Centeno JC (1973) Fracture toughness and duration of load factor I. Six principal systems of crack propagation and the duration factor for cracks propagating parallel to grain. Wood Fiber 5(2):152–159

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim NH (2014) Introduction to nonlinear finite element analysis. Springer, New-York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1746-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Bathe KJ (2006) Finite element procedures. K.J Bathe, Watertown

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. de Souza Neto EA, Peric D, Owen DR (2008) Computational methods for plasticity: theory and applications. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470694626

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Kojic M, Bathe KJ (2005) Inelastic analysis of solids and structures. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/b137717

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Schröder J, Gruttmann F, Löblein J (2002) A simple orthotropic finite elasto–plasticity model based on generalized stress–strain measures. Comput Mech 30:48–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-002-0366-3

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Jones RM (1999) Mechanics of composite materials. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498711067

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. De Borst R, Feenstra PH (1990) Studies in anisotropic plasticity with reference to the Hill criterion. Int J Numer Methods Eng 29:315–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620290208

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuna M (2013) Finite elements in fracture mechanics. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6680-8

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Sih GC, Paris PC, Irwin GR (1965) On cracks in rectilinearly anisotropic bodies. Int J Fract Mech 1:189–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Aliabad MH (2002) The boundary element method, volume 2: applications in solids and structures. John Wiley & sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  23. Asadpoure A, Mohammadi S (2007) Developing new enrichment functions for crack simulation in orthotropic media by the extended finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 69:2150–2172. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1839

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Jernkvist LO (2001) Fracture of wood under mixed mode loading: II. Experimental investigation of Picea abies. Eng Fract Mech 68(5):565–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00128-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Asadpoure A, Mohammadi S, Vafai A (2006) Modeling crack in orthotropic media using a coupled finite element and partition of unity methods. Finite Elem Anal Des 42(13):1165–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2006.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Saouma VE, Ayari ML, Leavell DA (1987) Mixed mode crack propagation in homogeneous anisotropic solids. Eng Fract Mech 27(2):171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(87)90166-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guan N, Thunell B, Lyth K (1983) On the friction between steel and some common Swedish wood species. Holz Roh Werkst 41:55–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02612232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Engwirda D (2014) Locally optimal Delaunay-refinement and optimisation-based mesh generation. Dissertation, The University of Sydney

  29. Forest Products Laboratory (2010) Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison

  30. Kivimaa E (1950) Cutting force in wood working. The State Institute for Technical Research, Helsinski

    Google Scholar 

  31. Iskra P, Hernández RE (2012) Analysis of cutting forces in straight-knife peripheral cutting of wood. Wood Fiber Sci 44(2):134–144

    Google Scholar 

  32. Murase Y (1984) Friction of wood sliding on various materials. J Facul Agric-Kyushu Univ 28(4):147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Code availability

The results presented in the figures were obtained from a combination of the equations detailed in the text. The pseudo-code of Table 4 also describes the return-mapping algorithm adopted in this study to work hardening. Therefore, no additional code is appended.

Funding

The support of NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raynald Guilbault.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aboussafy, C., Guilbault, R. Chip formation in machining of anisotropic plastic materials—a finite element modeling strategy applied to wood. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 114, 1471–1486 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06950-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06950-6

Keywords

Navigation