Skip to main content
Log in

Artificial neural network-based online defect detection system with in-mold temperature and pressure sensors for high precision injection molding

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Injection molding is widely used for mass production of thermoplastic parts with complex geometry and tight dimensional tolerance. However, due to the unavoidable shrinkage and uncontrollable process condition variations, defective parts may occur. Thus, dimensional control and online defect detection are extremely important for quality control, particularly for high precision injection molding. The conventional monitoring and control are based on machine setting parameters, but it may not capture the molding condition variations under the unchanged machine settings. This paper develops an artificial neural network (ANN)-based online defect detection system with the real-time data extracted from in-mold temperature and pressure sensors. Both multilinear linear regression (MLR) and ANN models were developed based on the real-time data, but the ANN model is much better than the MLR model. The ANN model has a high prediction accuracy of 98.34% with the coefficient of determination R2 of 91.37%. When applied to defect detection, the ANN model has a defect detection accuracy of 94.4% in consideration of type I and type II errors. This research demonstrates the feasibility of integrating such an ANN-based expert system to injection molding process, to improve online dimensional monitoring. The ANN model also can be easily adapted for detecting other quality characteristics of injection moldings, which would be helpful for the advances in intelligent injection molding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meza O, Vega E, Pérez E (2013) Influential factors on the outer lens color in an industrial injection molding process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(1–4):455–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gong G, Chen JC, Guo G (2017) Enhancing tensile strength of injection molded fiber reinforced composites using the Taguchi-based six sigma approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(9–12):3385–3393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guo G, Chen JC, Gong G (2018) Injection molding of polypropylene hybrid composites reinforced with carbon fiber and wood fiber. Polym Compos 39(9):3329–3335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guo G, Finkenstadt VL, Nimmagadda Y (2019) Mechanical properties and water absorption behavior of injection-molded wood fiber/carbon fiber high-density polyethylene hybrid composites. Adva Composit Hybrid Mater 2(4):690–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guo G, Kethineni C (2020) Direct injection molding of hybrid polypropylene/wood-fiber composites reinforced with glass fiber and carbon fiber. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(1–2):201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kramschuster A, Cavitt R, Ermer D, Chen Z, Turng LS (2005) Quantitative study of shrinkage and warpage behavior for microcellular and conventional injection molding. Polym Eng Sci 45(10):1408–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shen C, Kramschuster A, Ermer D, Turng LS (2006) Study of shrinkage and warpage in microcellular co-injection molding. Int Polym Process 21(4):393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kwon K, Isayev AI, Kim KH (2005) Toward a viscoelastic modeling of anisotropic shrinkage in injection molding of amorphous polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 98(5):2300–2313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurt M, Kaynak Y, Kamber OS, Mutlu B, Bakir B, Koklu U (2010) Influence of molding conditions on the shrinkage and roundness of injection molded parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46(5–8):571–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Santis FD, Pantani R, Speranza V, Titomanlio G (2010) Analysis of shrinkage development of a semicrystalline polymer during injection molding. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(5):2469–2476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen SC, Lin YC, Huang SW (2010) Study on the packing effects of external gas-assisted injection molding on part shrinkage in comparison with conventional injection molding. Polym Eng Sci 50(11):2085–2092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jong WR, Hwang SS, Tsai MC, Wu CC, Kao CH, Huang YM (2017) Effect of gas counter pressure on shrinkage and residual stress for injection molding process. J Polym Eng 37(5):505–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qi GQ, Xu YJ, Yang W, Xie BH, Yang MB (2011) Injection molding shrinkage and mechanical properties of polypropylene blends. J Macromol Sci B 50(9):1747–1760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lucyshyn T, Knapp G, Kipperer M, Holzer C (2012) Determination of the transition temperature at different cooling rates and its influence on prediction of shrinkage and warpage in injection molding simulation. J Appl Polym Sci 123(2):1162–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang R, Zeng J, Feng X, Xia Y (2013) Evaluation of effect of plastic injection molding process parameters on shrinkage based on neural network simulation. J Macromol Sci B 52(1):206–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abdul R, Guo G, Chen JC, Yoo JJW (2020) Shrinkage prediction of injection molded high density polyethylene parts with taguchi/artificial neural network hybrid experimental design. Int J Interact Des Manuf 14(2):345–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Syed SF, Chen JC, Guo G (2020) Optimization of tensile strength and shrinkage of talc-filled polypropylene as a packaging material in injection molding. J Packag Technol Res 4(1):69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guo G, Li Y, Zhao X, Rizvi, R (2020) Tensile and longitudinal shrinkage behaviors of polylactide/wood-fiber composites via direct injection molding. Polym Compos 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.25741

  19. Kc B, Faruk O, Agnelli JAM, Leao AL, Tjong J, Sain M (2016) Sisal-glass fiber hybrid biocomposite: optimization of injection molding parameters using Taguchi method for reducing shrinkage. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 83:152–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohan M, Ansari MNM, Shanks RA (2017) Review on the effects of process parameters on strength, shrinkage, and warpage of injection molding plastic component. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 56(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mirjavadi SS, Forsat M, Barati MR, Hamouda AMS (2020) Investigating nonlinear vibrations of multi-scale truncated conical shell segments with carbon nanotube/fiberglass reinforcement using a higher order conical shell theory. J Strain Anal Eng Des. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309324720939811

  22. Mirjavadi SS, Mohasel Afshari B, Shafiei N, Rabby S, Kazemi M (2018) Effect of temperature and porosity on the vibration behavior of two-dimensional functionally graded micro-scale Timoshenko beam. J Vib Control 24(18):4211–4225

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Mirjavadi SS, Rabby S, Shafiei N, Afshari BM, Kazemi M (2017) On size-dependent free vibration and thermal buckling of axially functionally graded nanobeams in thermal environment. Appl Phys A 123(5):315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shafiei N, Mirjavadi SS, Afshari BM, Rabby S, Hamouda AMS (2017) Nonlinear thermal buckling of axially functionally graded micro and nanobeams. Compos Struct 168:428–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Woll SL, Cooper DJ, Souder BV (1996) Online pattern-based part quality monitoring of the injection molding process. Polym Eng Sci 36(11):1477–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen J, Savage M, Zhu JJ (2008) Development of artificial neural network-based in-process mixed-material-caused flash monitoring (ANN-IPMFM) system in injection molding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36(1–2):43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang Y, Gao F (2006) Injection molding product weight: online prediction and control based on a nonlinear principal component regression model. Polym Eng Sci 46(4):540–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Michaeli W, Schreiber A (2009) Online control of the injection molding process based on process variables. Adv Polym Technol 28(2):65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao P, Zhou H, He Y, Cai K, Fu J (2014) A nondestructive online method for monitoring the injection molding process by collecting and analyzing machine running data. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72(5–8):765–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen Z, Turng LS, Wang KK (2006) Adaptive online quality control for injection-molding by monitoring and controlling mold separation. Polym Eng Sci 46(5):569–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang Y, Yang B, Zhu S, Chen X (2015) Online quality optimization of the injection molding process via digital image processing and model-free optimization. J Mater Process Technol 226:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fung KT, Gao F, Chen X (2007) Application of a capacitive transducer for online part weight prediction and fault detection in injection molding. Polym Eng Sci 47(4):347–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Johnston SP, Kazmer DO, Gao RX (2009) Online simulation-based process control for injection molding. Polym Eng Sci 49(12):2482–2491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kazmer DO, Johnston SP, Gao RX, Fan Z (2011) Feasibility analysis of an in-mold multivariate sensor. Int Polym Process 26(1):63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gordon G, Kazmer DO, Tang X, Fan Z, Gao RX (2015) Quality control using a multivariate injection molding sensor. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(9–12):1381–1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. RJG eDART Process Control Software v10 Manual. https://rjginc.com/product/edart-software-v10/. Accessed 6 July 2020

  37. Guyon I, Elisseeff A (2003) An introduction to variable and feature selection. J Mach Learn Res 3(Mar):1157–1182

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Aghajani M, Keramati A, Moghadam RT, Mirjavadi SS (2016) A mathematical programming model for cellular manufacturing system controlled by kanban with rework consideration. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(5–8):1377–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lei J (2019) Cross-validation with confidence. J Am Stat Assoc 1–20

  40. Rojas R (1996) The backpropagation algorithm. In: Neural networks (pp. 149–182). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-61068-4_7

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Winzeler Gear for providing the eDART system and supplying the Delrin 511DP acetal resin used in this study.

Funding

The authors are also grateful to the financial support from the Illinois Manufacturing Excellence Center (IMEC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gangjian Guo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J.C., Guo, G. & Wang, WN. Artificial neural network-based online defect detection system with in-mold temperature and pressure sensors for high precision injection molding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 110, 2023–2033 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06011-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06011-4

Keywords

Navigation