Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Additive manufacturing methods: techniques, materials, and closed-loop control applications

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Additive manufacturing encompasses a set of low-cost and highly versatile tools used to prototype and fabricate three-dimensional (3D) objects with ease. In most of the additive manufacturing techniques, materials are deposited layer by layer until a 3D object is reproduced. Several additive manufacturing techniques have been developed in the previous decade, and the application of additive manufacturing has increased in various industrial sectors. However, there are still drawbacks associated with additive manufacturing techniques, necessitating further study and development. In this study, we review the techniques and materials used in additive manufacturing. The vast majority of additive manufacturing processes are still based on open-loop control or implement some local controllers for specific variables (such as temperature), making them susceptible for errors. This study presents a review of the different additive manufacturing techniques, examples of academic and commercial efforts to improve the control systems for additive manufacturing, as well as the application of additive manufacturing in different fields such as aerospace, electronics, arts, and biomedical. The article ends highlighting the advantages of utilizing a closed-loop control system in additive manufacturing and discussing the work needed for further development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kocovic P (2017) History of additive manufacturing. In: Advances in chemical and materials engineering. IGI Global, pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2289-8.ch001

  2. Dilberoglu UM, Gharehpapagh B, Yaman U, Dolen M (2017) The role of additive manufacturing in the era of Industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf 11:545–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berman B (2012) 3-D printing: the new industrial revolution. Bus Horiz 55:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchanan C, Gardner L (2019) Metal 3D printing in construction: a review of methods, research, applications, opportunities and challenges. Eng Struct 180:332–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B (2015) Additive manufacturing: technologies 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing. Second, Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KT, Hui D (2018) Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos B Eng 143:172–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dolenc A (1994) An overview of rapid prototyping technologies in manufacturing. Helsinki University of Technology, pp 1–23

  8. Radharamanan R (2017) Additive manufacturing in manufacturing education: a new course development and implementation. 124th ASEE Annu 2017. Conf. Expo., vol (2017-June)

  9. Gardan J (2016) Additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and trends. Int J Prod Res 7543:3118–3132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1115909

  10. ISO/ASTM, ISO/ASTM 52900 (2015) Additive manufacturing-general principles-terminology.

  11. ASTM International (2013) F2792-12a - standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies. Rapid Manuf Assoc:10–12

  12. Khudyakov IV (2018) Fast photopolymerization of acrylate coatings: achievements and problems. Prog Org Coat 121:151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.04.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee H, Lim CHJ, Low MJ, Tham N, Murukeshan VM, Kim YJ (2017) Lasers in additive manufacturing: a review. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 4:307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-017-0037-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hull CW, Arcadia C (1984) Apparatus for production of three-dmensonal objects by stereolithography. United States Patent, Appl., No. 638905, Filed

  15. A. L. M. et O.D.W.J.-C. André, FR2567668A1. Alain Mehauté Olivier Witter Jean-Claude André, Paris

  16. 3D Systems Inc. (2017) Our story Systems. Online. https://www.3dsystems.com/our-story?smtNoRedir=1&_ga=2.152734138.2087497582.1539697878-1649132499.1539697878. Accessed 16 October 2018 3D

  17. Melchels FPW, Feijen J, Grijpma DW (2010) A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering. Biomaterials 31:6121–6130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sauerhoefer M, Mass C (1996) Method of post processing stereolithographically produced object p 5

  19. Kumbhar NN, Mulay AV (2018) Post processing methods used to improve surface finish of products which are manufactured by additive manufacturing technologies: a review. J Inst Eng India Ser C 99:481–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-016-0340-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. About carbon - who we are. Our vision. Online. https://www.carbon3d.com/about/. Accessed 17 October 2018

  21. Janusziewicz R, Tumbleston JR, Quintanilla AL, Mecham SJ, DeSimone JM (2016) Layerless fabrication with continuous liquid interface production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:11703–11708. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605271113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tumbleston JR, Shirvanyants D, Ermoshkin N, Janusziewicz R, Johnson AR, Kelly D, Chen K, Pinschmidt R, Rolland JP, Ermoshkin A, Samulski ET, DeSimone JM (2015) Additive manufacturing. Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Science 347:1349–1352. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa2397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Calignano F, Manfredi D, Ambrosio EP, Biamino S, Lombardi M, Atzeni E, Salmi A, Minetola P, Iuliano L, Fino P (2017) Overview on additive manufacturing technologies. Proc IEEE 105:593–612. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2016.2625098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Feng W, Fuh JY, Wong YS (2006) Development of a drop-on-demand micro dispensing system. Mater Sci Forum 507:25–30. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.505-507.25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gao F, Sonin AA (1994) Precise deposition of molten microdrops: the physics of digital microfabrication. R Società 444

  26. Stratasys|3D Printing & Additive Manufacturing| Stratasys. http://www.stratasys.com/. Accessed 18 October 2018.

  27. Wohlers report (2014) 3D printing and additive manufacturing state of the industry, annual worldwide progress report. Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  28. Do T, Kwon P, Shin CS (2017) Process development toward full-density stainless steel parts with binder jetting printing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 121:50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bai Y, Williams CB (2018) Binder jetting additive manufacturing with a particle-free metal ink as a binder precursor. Mater Des 147:146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ziaee M, Crane NB (2019) Binder jetting: a review of process, materials, and methods. Addit Manuf 28:781–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Meteyer S, Xu X, Perry N, Zhao YF (2014) Energy and material flow analysis of binder-jetting additive manufacturing processes. Procedia CIRP 15:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Crump SS (1992) Apparatus and method for creating three-dimensional object. 5:329, 1192

  33. Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2015) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. Adv Manuf 3:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bikas H, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G (2016) Additive manufacturing methods and modeling approaches: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:389–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jones R, Haufe P, Sells E, Iravani P, Olliver V, Palmer C, Bowyer A (2011) Reprap - the replicating rapid prototyper, Robotica. Robotica 29:177-191. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026357471000069X

  36. FDM Setup (2018) https://www.researchgate.net/figure/FDM-setup-243_fig5_321702417.

  37. Wohlers TT (2011) Wohlers report 2011: additive manufacturing and 3D printing state of the industry annual worldwide progress ReportTitle. Wohlers Associates, Inc., Fort Collins

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sun J, Zhou W, Huang D, Fuh JY, Hong G (2015) An overview of 3D printing technologies for food fabrication. Food Bioprocess Technol 8:1605–1615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-015-1528-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Vozzi G, Previti A, De Rossi D, Ahluwalia AR (2002) Microsyringe-based deposition of two-dimensional and three-dimensional polymer scaffolds with a well-defined geometry for application to tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 8:1089–1098. https://doi.org/10.1089/107632702320934182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sun J, Peng Z, Zhou W, Fuh JY, Hong GS, Chiu A (2015) A review on 3D printing for customized food fabrication. Procedia Manuf 1:308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mitchell A, Lafont U, Holynska M, Semprimoschnig C (2018) Additive construction: state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. Elsevier Enhanced Reader.pdf, 24. pp 606–626

  42. Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23:1917–1928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Attar H, Calin M, Zhang LC, Scudino S, Eckert J (2014) Manufacture by selective laser melting and mechanical behavior of commercially pure titanium. Mater Sci Eng A 593:170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.11.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Oshida Y (2013) 10 - Fabrication technologies, Y. B. T.-B. and B. of T. M. (second edn., Oshida, Oxford). Elsevier, pp 303–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62625-7.00010-8

  45. Casalino G, Campanelli SL, Contuzzi N, Ludovico AD (2015) Experimental investigation and statistical optimisation of the selective laser melting process of a maraging steel. Opt Laser Technol 65:151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2014.07.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kruth JP, Froyen L, Van Vaerenbergh J, Mercelis P, Rombouts M, Lauwers B (2004) Selective laser melting of iron-based powder. J Mater Process Technol 149:616–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(04)00220-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Meiners W, Wissenbach KD, Gasser AD (1998) Shaped body especially prototype or replacement part production, DE19649849C1

  48. Contuzzi N, Campanelli SL, Ludovico AD (2011) 3D finite element analysis in the selective laser melting process. Int J Simul Model 10:113–121. https://doi.org/10.2507/IJSIMM10(3)1.169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Parandoush P, Lin D (2017) A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites. Compos Struct 182:36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hehr A, Dapino MJ (2015) Interfacial shear strength estimates of NiTi-Al matrix composites fabricated via ultrasonic additive manufacturing. Compos B Eng 77:199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Li J, Monaghan T, Nguyen TT, Kay RW, Friel RJ, Harris RA (2017) Multifunctional metal matrix composites with embedded printed electrical materials fabricated by ultrasonic additive manufacturing. Compos B Eng 113:342–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ahn D, Kweon J-H, Choi J, Lee S (2012) Quantification of surface roughness of parts processed by laminated object manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 212:339–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hahnlen R, Dapino MJ (2014) NiTi-Al interface strength in ultrasonic additive manufacturing composites. Compos B Eng 59:101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Feygin M, Hsieh B (1991) Laminated object manufacturing: a simpler process. Proc. 2nd solid free. fabr symp. 0. pp 123–130

  55. Tan X, Kok Y, Tan YJ, Descoins M, Mangelinck D, Tor SB, Leong KF, Chua CK (2015) Graded microstructure and mechanical properties of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V via electron beam melting. Acta Mater 97:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mahamood RM, Akinlabi ET (2017) Scanning speed and powder flow rate influence on the properties of laser metal deposition of titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:2419–2426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9954-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Thompson SM, Bian L, Shamsaei N, Yadollahi A (2015) An overview of direct laser deposition for additive manufacturing; Part I: transport phenomena, modeling and diagnostics. Addit Manuf 8:36–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 3DEO, metal 3D printing processes - directed energy deposition (DED), 3DEO (2018) https://news.3deo.co/metal-3d-printing-processes-directed-energy-deposition-ded.

  59. Heigel JC, Michaleris P, Reutzel EW (2015) Thermo-mechanical model development and validation of directed energy deposition additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V. Addit Manuf 5:9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2014.10.003

  60. Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, Gou J, Hui D (2017) 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Compos B Eng 110:442–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. González-Henríquez CM, Sarabia-Vallejos MA, Rodriguez-Hernandez J (2019) Polymers for additive manufacturing and 4D-printing: materials, methodologies, and biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci 94:57–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kazemian A, Yuan X, Cochran E, Khoshnevis B (2017) Cementitious materials for construction-scale 3D printing: laboratory testing of fresh printing mixture. Constr Build Mater 145:639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Singh S, Ramakrishna S, Singh R (2017) Material issues in additive manufacturing: a review. J Manuf Process 25:185–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Simpson TW, Williams CB, Hripko M (2017) Preparing industry for additive manufacturing and its applications: summary & recommendations from a National Science Foundation workshop. Addit Manuf 13:166–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Bourell DL, Leu MC, Rosen DW (2009) Identifying the future of freeform processing 2009. Rapid Prototyp J 92

  66. Mitchell A, Lafont U, Hołyńska M, Semprimoschnig C (2018) Additive manufacturing—a review of 4D printing and future applications. Addit Manuf 24:606–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Tymrak BM, Kreiger M, Pearce JM (2014) Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des 58:242–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Faes M, Abbeloos W, Vogeler F (2016) Process monitoring of extrusion based 3D printing via laser scanning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.02219.

  69. Batchelder JS (2016) Additive manufacturing system and method for printing three-dimensional parts using velocimetry United States patent US 9527240

  70. Sammons PM, Gegel ML, Bristow DA, Landers R (2019) Repetitive process control of additive manufacturing with application to laser metal deposition. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol 27:566–575. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2017.2781653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Mani M, Lane B, Donmez A, Donmez A, Moylan S, Fesperman R (2015) Measurement science needs for real-time control of additive manufacturing powder bed fusion processes 55:1400–1418

  72. Holzmond O, Li X (2017) In situ real time defect detection of 3D printed parts. Addit Manuf 17:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Mireles J, Terrazas C, Gaytan SM, Roberson DA, Wicker RB (2015) Closed-loop automatic feedback control in electron beam melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78:1193–1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6708-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Zhang B, Liu S, Shin YC (2019) In-process monitoring of porosity during laser additive manufacturing process. Addit Manuf 28:497–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Sturm LD, Albakri MI, Tarazaga PA, Williams CB (2019) In situ monitoring of material jetting additive manufacturing process via impedance based measurements. Addit Manuf 28:456–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. National Institute of Standards and Technology (2013) Measurement science roadmap for metal-based additive manufacturing

  77. Xia H, Lu J, Tryggvason G (2019) Simulations of fused filament fabrication using a front tracking method. Int J Heat Mass Transf 138:1310–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Paul R, Anand S, Gerner F (2014) Effect of thermal deformation on part errors in metal powder based additive manufacturing processes. J Manuf Sci Eng:136

  79. Rupal S, Qureshi AJ (2018) Geometric deviation modeling and tolerancing in additive manufacturing: A GDT perspective. 1st Conf NSERC Netw Holist Innov Addit Manuf 1–6

  80. Dantan JY, Huang Z, Goka E, Homri L, Etienne A, Bonnet N, Rivette M (2017) Geometrical variations management for additive manufactured product. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 66:161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Comminal R, Serdeczny MP, Pedersen DB, Spangenberg J (2018) Numerical modeling of the strand deposition flow in extrusion-based additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 20:68–76

    Google Scholar 

  82. Serdeczny MP, Comminal R, Pedersen DB, Spangenberg J (2018) Experimental validation of a numerical model for the strand shape in material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 24:145–153

    Google Scholar 

  83. Nie P, Ojo OA, Li Z (2014) Numerical modeling of microstructure evolution during laser additive manufacturing of a nickel-based superalloy. Acta Mater 77:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Wei HL, Mazumder J, Debroy T (2015) Evolution of solidification texture during additive manufacturing. Nat Publ Gr:1–7

  85. Domingo-espin M, Puigoriol-forcada JM, Garcia-granada A, Llumà J, Borros S, Reyes G (2015) Mechanical property characterization and simulation of fused deposition modeling polycarbonate parts. Mater Des 83:670–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Schoinochoritis B, Chantzis D, Salonitis K (2017) Simulation of metallic powder bed additive manufacturing processes with the finite element method: a critical review. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 231:96–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Lehmhus D, Aumund-Kopp C, Petzoldt F, Godlinski D, Haberkrn A, Zolmer V, Busse M (2016) Customized smartness: a survey on links between additive manufacturing and sensor integration. Procedia Technol 26:284–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Hu D, Kovacevic R (2003) Sensing, modeling and control for laser-based additive manufacturing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Jariwala S, Schwerzel RE, Werve M, Rosen DW (2012) Two-dimensional real-time interferometric monitoring system for exposure controlled projection lithography. ASME/ISCIE 2012 Int Symp Flex Autom ISFA 2012. 457–464

  90. Bi G, Sun CN, Gasser A (2013) Study on influential factors for process monitoring and control in laser aided additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 213:463–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Anderegg DA, Bryant HA, Ruffin DC, Skrip SM Jr, Fallon JJ, Gilmer EL, Bortner MJ (2019) In-situ monitoring of polymer flow temperature and pressure in extrusion based additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 26:76–83

    Google Scholar 

  92. Rojas Arciniegas AJ, Cerón Viveros M (2018) Development of a closed-loop control system for the movements of the extruder and platform of a FDM 3D printing system. NIP & Digital Fabrication Conf Printing Fabr:176–181

  93. Rao PK, Liu J, Roberson D, Kong Z, Williams C (2015) Online real-time quality monitoring in additive manufacturing processes using heterogeneous sensors. J Manuf Sci Eng 137

  94. Zhang S, Sun Z, Long J, Li C, Bai Y (2019) Dynamic condition monitoring for 3D printers by using error fusion of multiple sparse auto-encoders. Comput Ind 105:164–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Chua ZY, Ahn IH, Moon SK (2017) Process monitoring and inspection systems in metal additive manufacturing: Status and applications. Int J Precis Eng Manuf - Green Technol 4:235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Everton SK, Hirsch M, Stavroulakis PI, Leach RK, Clare AT (2016) Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing. Mater Des 95:431–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Nassar R, Spurgeon TJ, Reutzel EW (2014) Sensing defects during directed-energy additive manufacturing of metal parts using optical emissions spectroscopy. Solid Freeform Fabr Symp Proc:278–287

  98. Kwon KS, Choi YS, Lee DY, Kim JS, Kim DS (2012) Low-cost and high speed monitoring system for a multi-nozzle piezo inkjet head. Sens Act A: Phys 180:154–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Batchelder JS, Swanson WJ, Johnson KC (2015) Additive manufacturing system and process with material flow feedback control United States patent US 10201931

  100. Batchelder JS, Curtis HW, Goodman DS, Gracer F, Jackson RR, Koppelman GM, Mackay JD (1994) Model generation system having closed-loop extrusion nozzle positoning United States patent US 5303141

  101. Liu H, Yuan Z, Jinfa L (2016) Closed-loop control fused deposition modeling high-speed 3D printer and closed-loop control method. United States patent application US 14/908662

  102. Zinniel RL, Batchelder JS (2000) Volumetric feed control for flexible filament United States patent US:6085957

  103. Zmorph (2019) ZMorph multitool 3D printers. https://zmorph3d.com/. Accessed 06 March 2019.

  104. ZMorph, Closed Loop System82.Zmorph (2019) closed loop system in ZMorph 2.0 SX explained - ZMorph blog. Online. http://blog.zmorph3d.com/closed-loop-system-explained/. Accessed 06 March 2019.

  105. B420 and B830—Stellamove. https://www.stellamove.com/b420/. Accessed 31October 2018.

  106. Stellamove (2019) we make ROBOTS. https://www.stellamove.com/. Accessed 06 March 2019.,

  107. Inkbit | Hardware. https://inkbit3d.com/hardware. Accessed 17 May 2020.

  108. Inkbit | Additive manufacturing powered by machine vision and AI. Available: https://inkbit3d.com/. Accessed 17 May 2020.

  109. Sciaky | IRISS closed loop control for additive manufacturing. Available: https://www.sciaky.com/additive-manufacturing/iriss-closed-loop-control. Accessed 17 May 2020.

  110. CLAMIR - Closed-loop laser power control system for cladding and laser metal deposition processes. Available: https://www.clamir.com/en/. .

  111. CLAMIR - Specifications. Available: https://www.clamir.com/en/specifications/. .

  112. Temperature sensors for additive manufacturing systems. Available: http://stratonics.com/systems/. Accessed 17 May 2020.

  113. Sensor systems for additive manufacturing applications. Available: http://stratonics.com/systems/applications/. Accessed 17 May 2020.

  114. Additive manufacturing - volkmann.info. Available: https://uk.volkmann.info/additivemanufacturing/?highlight=powtrexi. Accessed 18 May 2020.

  115. Go J, Schiffres SN, Stevens AG, Hart AJ (2017) Rate limits of additive manufacturing by fused filament fabrication and guidelines for high-throughput system design. Addit Manuf 16:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Caltanissetta F, Grasso M, Petrò S, Colosimo BM (2018) Characterization of in-situ measurements based on layerwise imaging in laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 24:183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.09.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Baumann F, Schön M, Eichhoff J, Roller D (2016) Concept development of a sensor array for 3D printer. Procedia CIRP 51:24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Nassar AR, Keist JS, Reutzel EW, Spurgeon TJ (2015) Intra-layer closed-loop control of build plan during directed energy additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V. Addit Manuf 6:39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Rojas Arciniegas AJ, Hurtado JCA (2016) Development of a supervision system: Towards closing the control loop in 3D printing systems, 2016 32nd Int. Conf Digit Print Technol NIP pp 221–226

  120. Weiss BJ (2014) Closed loop control of a 3D printer Gantry. University of Washington Libraries, Doctoral dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  121. Tlegenov Y, Hong GS, Lu WF (2018) Nozzle condition monitoring in 3D printing. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 54:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2018.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Keaveney SG, Dowling DP (2018) Application of additive manufacturing in design & manufacturing engineering education. Manuf Syst SIMS 2018, 018-Janua 2nd Int. Symp Small-Scale Intell 1–6

  123. Farré-Guasch E, Wolff J, Helder MN, Schulten EA, Forouzanfar T, Klein-Nulend J (2015) Application of additive manufacturing in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73:2408–2418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.04.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Zhang F, Campbell RI, Graham IJ (2016) Application of additive manufacturing to the digital restoration of archaeological artefacts. IJRAPIDM 6:75. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2016.078747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Monkevich JM, Le Sage GP (2019) Design and fabrication of a custom-dielectric Fresnel multi-zone plate lens antenna using additive manufacturing techniques. IEEE Access 7:61452–61460. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Perigaud A, Tantot O, Delhote N, Verdeyme S, Bila S, Pacaud D, Carpentier L, Puech J, Lapierre L, Carayon G (2017) Continuously tuned ku-band cavity filter based on dielectric perturbers made by ceramic additive manufacturing for space applications. Proc IEEE 105:677–687. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2017.2663104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Yan Y, Moss J, Ngo KDT, Mei Y, Lu GQ (2017) Additive manufacturing of toroid inductor for power electronics applications. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 53:5709–5714. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2017.2729504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Reddy KVP, Mirzana IM, Reddy AK (2018) Application of additive manufacturing technology to an aerospace component for better trade-off’s. Mater Today Proc 5:3895–3902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Fang T, Jafari MA, Danforth SC, Safari A (2003) Safari, signature analysis and defect detection in layered manufacturing of ceramic sensors and actuators. Mach Vis Appl 15:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Greeff GP, Schilling M (2017) Closed loop control of slippage during filament transport in molten material extrusion. Addit Manuf 14:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of FABLAB-Cali at Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, where some of the additive manufacturing technologies discussed in this study were available for usage and detailed exploration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, investigation, and writing—original draft: Francisco Jose Mercado Rivera. Writing—review and editing and supervision: Alvaro Jose Rojas Arciniegas.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Jose Mercado Rivera.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mercado Rivera, F.J., Rojas Arciniegas, A.J. Additive manufacturing methods: techniques, materials, and closed-loop control applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109, 17–31 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05663-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05663-6

Keywords

Navigation