Skip to main content
Log in

Sustainable turning of Inconel 718 nickel alloy using MQL strategy based on graphene nanofluids

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nickel-based alloys are classified as difficult-to-cut metals due to their low thermal conductivity and strength even at high temperatures. The crucial challenge when turning these alloys is the obtainment of a high surface integrity since they are often used in critical applications like aerospace and oil and gas ones. This is usually fulfilled using cutting fluids that may lead to ecological and health-related issues as well as increase of the production costs. In this context, the paper evaluates the feasibility of sustainable turning of the Inconel 718 alloy using the minimum quantity lubrication strategy based on graphene nanofluids. Graphene nanoplatelets of two sizes, namely 5 μm and 15 μm, were used as additives to a vegetable oil to form nanofluids. The effectiveness of using nanofluids with the respect to dry, flood, and pure minimum quantity lubrication strategies was investigated at different cutting speeds. Results showed that the nanofluid with the lowest size of graphene nanoplatelets promoted the best surface quality assuring a 6% and 15% reduction in surface roughness at the highest and lowest cutting speed, respectively, compared to flood condition that represents the current machining standard. In addition, the use of the graphene nanoplatelets of the lowest size promoted the formation of a 23% thicker severe plastic deformed layer compared to the flood case at the highest cutting speed. These findings prove that the nanoparticles’ efficiency as additives in a metalworking fluid depends on their size, which, in turn, influences their thermo-physical characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pusavec F, Krajnik P, Kopac J (2010) Transitioning to sustainable production - Part I: application on machining technologies. J Clean Prod 18:174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST (2017) Hybrid cooling and lubricating technology for CNC milling of Inconel 718 nickel alloy. Procedia CIRP 11:625–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brinksmeier E, Walter A, Jansscn R, Diersen P (1999) Aspects of cooling lubrication reduction in machining advanced materials. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 213:769–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Howes T (1990) Assessment of the cooling and lubricative properties of grinding fluids. CIRP Ann 39(1):313–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61061-0

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Cholakov GS, Guest TL, Rowe GW (1992) Lubricating properties of grinding fluids: 1. Comparison of fluids in surface grinding experiments. Lubr Eng 48:155–163

    Google Scholar 

  6. Soković M, Mijanović K (2001) Ecological aspects of the cutting fluids and its influence on quantifiable parameters of the cutting processes. J Mater Process Technol 109:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00794-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Krajnik P, Pusavec F, Rashid A (2011). Nanofluids: properties, applications and sustainability aspects in materials processing technologies. In Advances in sustainable manufacturing (pp. 107-113). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20183-7_16

  8. Da Silva LR, Bianchi EC, Fusse RY, Catai RE, Franca TV, Aguiar PR (2007) Analysis of surface integrity for minimum quantity lubricant—MQL in grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(2):412–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Krolczyk GM, Maruda RW, Krolczyk JB, Wojciechowski S, Mia M, Nieslony P, Budzik G (2019) Ecological trends in machining as a key factor in sustainable production–a review. J Clean Prod 218:601–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Maruda RW, Krolczyk GM, Wojciechowski S, Zak K, Habrat W, Nieslony P (2018) Effects of extreme pressure and anti-wear additives on surface topography and tool wear during MQCL turning of AISI 1045 steel. J Mech Sci Technol 32(4):1585–1591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-018-0313-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maruda RW, Krolczyk GM, Wojciechowski S, Powalka B, Klos S, Szczotkarz N, Matuszak M, Khanna N (2020) Evaluation of turning with different cooling-lubricating techniques in terms of surface integrity and tribologic properties. Tribol Int 106334:106334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krolczyk GM, Maruda RW, Krolczyk JB, Nieslony P, Wojciechowski S, Legutko S (2018) Parametric and nonparametric description of the surface topography in the dry and MQCL cutting conditions. Measurement. 121:225–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh R, Dureja JS, Dogra M, Gupta MK, Mia M, Song Q (2020) Wear behavior of textured tools under graphene-assisted minimum quantity lubrication system in machining Ti-6Al-4 V alloy. Tribol Int 145:106183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rahman SS, Ashraf MZI, Amin AN, Bashar MS, Ashik MFK, Kamruzzaman M (2019) Tuning nanofluids for improved lubrication performance in turning biomedical grade titanium alloy. J Clean Prod 206:180–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ali MAM, Azmi AI, Khalil ANM (2018) Specific cutting energy of Inconel 718 under dry, chilled-air and minimal quantity nanolubricants. Procedia CIRP 77:429–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bryant PJ, Gutshall PL, Taylor LH (1964) A study of mechanisms of graphite friction and wear. Wear 7(1):118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(64)90083-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jamil M, Khan AM, Hegab H, Gupta MK, Mia M, He N, Zhao G, Song Q, Liu Z (2020) Milling of Ti–6Al–4 V under hybrid Al2O3-MWCNT nanofluids considering energy consumption, surface quality, and tool wear: a sustainable machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107(9-10):4141–4157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05296-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khan AM, Gupta MK, Hegab H, Jamil M, Mia M, He N, Song Q, Liu Z, Pruncu CI (2020) Energy-based cost integrated modelling and sustainability assessment of Al-GnP hybrid nanofluid assisted turning of AISI52100 steel. J Clean Prod 257:120502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yi S, Mo J, Ding S (2019) Experimental investigation on the performance and mechanism of graphene oxide nanofluids in turning Ti-6Al-4V. J Manuf Process 43:164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gutnichenko O, Bushlya V, Bihagen S, Ståhl JE (2018) Influence of GnP additive to vegetable oil on machining performance when MQL-assisted turning alloy 718. Procedia Manuf 25:330–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hegab H, Umer U, Soliman M, Kishawy HA (2018) Effects of nano-cutting fluids on tool performance and chip morphology during machining Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:3449–3458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1825-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Alberts M, Kalaitzidou K, Melkote S (2009) An investigation of graphite nanoplatelets as lubricant in grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:966–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marcon A, Melkote S, Kalaitzidou K, Debra D (2010) An experimental evaluation of graphite nanoplatelet based lubricant in micro-milling. CIRP Annals - Manu Techno 59:141–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Standard ASTM (2010) E112–10. Standard test method for determining average grain size. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa

    Google Scholar 

  25. Calleja A, Urbikain G, González H, Cerrillo I, Polvorosa R, Lamikiz A (2018) Inconel® 718 superalloy machinability evaluation after laser cladding additive manufacturing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97:2873–2885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2169-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ren X, Liu Z (2016) Influence of cutting parameters on work hardening behavior of surface layer during turning superalloy Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86:2319–2327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8350-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Behera BC, Alemayehu H, Ghosh S, Rao PV (2017) A comparative study of recent lubri-coolant strategies for turning of Ni-based superalloy. J Manuf Process 30:541–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.10.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Teng TP, Hung YH (2014) Estimation and experimental study of the density and specific heat for alumina nanofluid. J Exp Nanosci 9:707–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458080.2012.696219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. ISO I (2012) 25178-2: 2012—Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—surface texture: areal—Part 2: Terms, Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters. Geneva, Switzerland, International Standards Organization

    Google Scholar 

  30. American Society for Testing and Materials (2017) ASTM E384: standard test method for microindentation hardness of materials. ASTM, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zaman PB, Dhar NR (2019) Design and evaluation of an embedded double jet nozzle for MQL delivery intending machinability improvement in turning operation. J Manuf Process 44:179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.05.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Khan A, Maity K (2017) Comparative study of some machinability aspects in turning of pure titanium with untreated and cryogenically treated carbide inserts. J Manuf Process 28:272–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.05.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xiong S, Qi W, Cheng Y, Huang B, Wang M, Li Y (2011) Universal relation for size dependent thermodynamic properties of metallic nanoparticles. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13(22):10652–10660. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CP90161J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yıldırım ÇV, Sarıkaya M, Kıvak T, Şirin Ş (2019) The effect of addition of hBN nanoparticles to nanofluid-MQL on tool wear patterns, tool life, roughness and temperature in turning of Ni-based Inconel 625. Tribol Int 134:443–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2019.02.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Özbek O, Saruhan H (2020) The effect of vibration and cutting zone temperature on surface roughness and tool wear in eco-friendly MQL turning of AISI D2. J Mater Res Technol 9(3):2762–2772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu W, Do IH, Fukushima H, Drzal LT (2010) Influence of processing on morphology, electrical conductivity and flexural properties of exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets-polyamide nanocomposites. Carbon Lett 11(4):279–284. https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2010.11.4.279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Trent EM (1988) Metal cutting and the tribology of seizure: II movement of work material over the tool in metal cutting. Wear 128:47–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(88)90252-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Khan MMA, Mithu MAH, Dhar NR (2009) Effects of minimum quantity lubrication on turning AISI 9310 alloy steel using vegetable oil-based cutting fluid. J Mater Process Technol 209:5573–5583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sartori S, Ghiotti A, Bruschi S (2017) Temperature effects on the Ti6Al4V machinability using cooled gaseous nitrogen in semi-finishing turning. J Manuf Process 30:187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.09.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou JM, Bushlya V, Stahl JE (2012) An investigation of surface damage in the high speed turning of Inconel 718 with use of whisker reinforced ceramic tools. J Mater Process Technol 212(2):372–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhou J, Bushlya V, Peng RL, Chen Z, Johansson S, Stahl JE (2014) Analysis of subsurface microstructure and residual stresses in machined Inconel 718 with PCBN and Al2O3-SiCw tools. Procedia CIRP 13:150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.04.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Umbrello D (2013) Investigation of surface integrity in dry machining of Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:2183–2190. 9:2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5198-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pusavec F, Hamdi H, Kopac J, Jawahir IS (2011) Surface integrity in cryogenic machining of nickel based alloy—Inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol 211(4):773–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jawahir IS, Van Luttervelt CA (1993) Recent developments in chip control research and applications. CIRP Ann 42(2):659–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62531-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Behera BC, Ghosh S, Rao PV (2016) Application of nanofluids during minimum quantity lubrication: a case study in turning process. Tribol Int 101:234–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2016.04.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ahammed N, Asirvatham LG, Wongwises S (2016) Effect of volume concentration and temperature on viscosity and surface tension of graphene–water nanofluid for heat transfer applications. J Therm Anal Calorim 123(2):1399–1409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-5034-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Peng DX, Kang Y, Hwang RM, Shyr SS, Chang YP (2009) Tribological properties of diamond and SiO2 nanoparticles added in paraffin. Tribol Int 42:911–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2008.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge with the financial support of this research by China Scholarship Council (grant no. 201906830023) and Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics PhD short-term visiting scholar project (grant no. 190114DF05).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefania Bruschi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gong, L., Bertolini, R., Ghiotti, A. et al. Sustainable turning of Inconel 718 nickel alloy using MQL strategy based on graphene nanofluids. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108, 3159–3174 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05626-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05626-x

Keywords

Navigation