Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic performance analysis and optimization method of the horizontal machining center based on contact theory

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A dynamic performance analysis and optimization method of the horizontal machining center based on contact theory was presented in this paper. The contact stiffness models of ball screw joints and guide joints were proposed based on contact theory, and the predicted values are in good agreement with the experimental results. In particular, the prediction errors of the ball screw joints are within 2.8% compared with the 13 sets of experimental results of THK Company for 26 types. The analysis principle of dynamic performance was given by modal theory. With the goal of reducing the sum of modal flexibility and strengthening the weak modes, static flexibility analysis, modal flexibility analysis, and potential energy distribution analysis were carried out. By studying the effects of geometric parameters, material parameters, surface parameters, and assembly parameters on weak parts, the most effective parameters for optimization were determined. The sensitive parameters were improved from type selection, surface technology, assembly process, and structural improvement. The optimization results showed that the modal flexibility of the weak modes has been reduced by 51.80%, 38.44%, 46.58%, and 27.21%, respectively, the modal flexibility ratios have been reduced by 17.27%, 5.19%, 27.11%, and 2.45%, respectively, and the 1st, 3rd, 4th, and 7th natural frequencies of the horizontal machining center have increased by 26.64%, 11.38%, 4.14%, and 4.55%, respectively. The effects of various parameters on the horizontal machining center were also discussed, which can provide reference for further optimization and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tlusty J, Ziegert JC, Ridgeway S (2000) A comparison of stiffness characteristics of serial and parallel machine tools. J Manuf Process 2(1):67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yan R, Peng FY, Li B (2008) A method of general stiffness modeling for multi-axis machine tool. International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Applications. Springer, In, pp 1013–1021

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huang DT-Y, Lee J-J (2001) On obtaining machine tool stiffness by CAE techniques. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(8):1149–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balachandran B, Zhao MX (2000) A mechanics based model for study of dynamics of milling operations. Meccanica 35:89–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Long X, Balachandran B (2010) Stability of up-milling and down-milling operations with variable spindle speed. J Vib Control 16:1151–1168

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Čelič D, Boltežar M (2008) Identification of the dynamic properties of joints using frequency–response functions. J Sound Vib 317(1-2):158–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Čelič D, Boltežar M (2009) The influence of the coordinate reduction on the identification of the joint dynamic properties. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(4):1260–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mao KM, Li B, Wu J, Shao XY (2010) Stiffness influential factors-based dynamic modeling and its parameter identification method of fixed joints in machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(2):156–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mi L, Yin GF, Sun MN, Wang XH (2012) Effects of preloads on joints on dynamic stiffness of a whole machine tool structure. J Mech Sci Technol 26(2):495–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deng CY, Yin GF, Fang H, Meng ZYX (2015) Dynamic characteristics optimization for a whole vertical machining center based on the configuration of joint stiffness. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5-8):1225–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shi YG, Zhao XY, Zhang HJ, Nie YX, Zhang DW (2016) A new top-down design method for the stiffness of precision machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(9-12):1887–1904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gao XM, Li BT, Hong J, Guo JK (2016) Stiffness modeling of machine tools based on machining space analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86(5-8):2093–2106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang SY, Zhu SL (2010) Dynamic characteristic parameters of linear guideway joint with ball screw. Journal of Mech Eng 46(1):92–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zou CF, Zhang HJ, Lu D, Zhang J, Zhao WH (2017) Effect of the screw–nut joint stiffness on the position-dependent dynamics of a vertical ball screw feed system without counterweight. J Mech Eng Sci 232(15):2599–2609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang J, Zhang HJ, Du C, Zhao WH (2016) Research on the dynamics of ball screw feed system with high acceleration. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 111:9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Majumdar A, Bhushan B (1991) Fractal model of elastic-plastic contact between rough surfaces. J Tribol 113(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang XL, Huang YM, Wen SH (2000) Fractal model of contact stiffness of joint surfaces. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery 31(4):89–91

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morag Y, Etsion I (2007) Resolving the contradiction of asperities plastic to elastic mode transition in current contact models of fractal rough surfaces. Wear 262(5-6):624–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miao XM, Huang XD (2014) A complete contact model of a fractal rough surface. Wear 309(1-2):146–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou AA, Chen TN, Wang XP, Xi YH (2015) Fractal contact spot and its application in the contact model of isotropic surfaces. J Appl Phys 118(16):165307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang SY, Zheng YJ, Zhu H (2010) A contact stiffness model of machined plane joint based on fractal theory. J Tribol 132(1):011401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yuan Y, Cheng Y, Liu K, Gan L (2017) A revised Majumdar and Bushan model of elastoplastic contact between rough surfaces. Appl Surf Sci 425:1138–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang DY, Xia Y, Scarpa F, Hong J, Ma YH (2017) Interfacial contact stiffness of fractal rough surfaces. Sci Rep 7(1):12874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen HX, Yin Q, Dong GH, Xie LF, Yin GF (2019) Stiffness model of fixed joint considering self-affinity and elastoplasticity of asperities. Ind Lubr Tribol 72(1):128–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sun MN, Mi L, Gan J, Yin GF (2012) An optimum identification method of dynamic characteristic parameters of guideway joint on a NC machine tool. Adv Eng Sci 44(3):220–226

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research is supported by Sichuan University and Zigong Research Funds (2019CDZG-2) and the Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province (No. 2019ZDZX0021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guofu Yin.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Tan, Z., Tan, F. et al. Dynamic performance analysis and optimization method of the horizontal machining center based on contact theory. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108, 3055–3073 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05597-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05597-z

Keywords

Navigation