Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Review of tool condition monitoring in machining and opportunities for deep learning

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tool condition monitoring and machine tool diagnostics are performed using advanced sensors and computational intelligence to predict and avoid adverse conditions for cutting tools and machinery. Undesirable conditions during machining cause chatter, tool wear, and tool breakage, directly affecting the tool life and consequently the surface quality, dimensional accuracy of the machined parts, and tool costs. Tool condition monitoring is, therefore, extremely important for manufacturing efficiency and economics. Acoustic emission, vibration, power, and temperature sensors monitor the stability and efficiency of the machining process, collecting large amounts of data to detect tool wear, breakage, and chatter. Studies on monitoring the vibrations and acoustic emissions from machine tools have provided information and data regarding the detection of undesirable conditions. Herein, studies on tool condition monitoring are reviewed and classified. As Industry 4.0 penetrates all manufacturing sectors, the amount of manufacturing data generated has reached the level of big data, and classical artificial intelligence analyses are no longer adequate. Nevertheless, recent advances in deep learning methods have achieved revolutionary success in numerous industries. Deep multi-layer perceptron (DMLP), long-short-term memory (LSTM), convolutional neural network (CNN), and deep reinforcement learning (DRL) are among the most preferred methods of deep learning in recent years. As data size increases, these methods have shown promising performance improvement in prediction and learning, compared to classical artificial intelligence methods. This paper summarizes tool condition monitoring first, then presents the underlying theory of some of the most recent deep learning methods, and finally, attempts to identify new opportunities in tool condition monitoring, toward the realization of Industry 4.0.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Byrne G, Dornfeld D, Inasaki I, Ketteler G, König W, Teti R (1995) Tool condition monitoring (TCM) - the status of research and industrial application. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 44(2):541–567

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang C, Yao X, Zhang J, Jin H (2016) Tool condition monitoring and remaining useful life prognostic based on a wireless sensor in dry milling operations. Sensors (Switzerland) 16(6)

  3. Roth JT, Djurdjanovic D, Yang X, Mears L, Kurfess T (2010) Quality and inspection of machining operations: tool condition monitoring. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 132(4):0410151–04101516

    Google Scholar 

  4. Siddhpura A, Paurobally R (2013) A review of flank wear prediction methods for tool condition monitoring in a turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65(1–4):371–393

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sick B (2002) On-line and indirect tool wear monitoring in turning with artificial neural networks: a review of more than a decade of research. Mech Syst Signal Process 16(4):487–546

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dan L, Mathew J (1990) Tool wear and failure monitoring techniques for turning-a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 30(4):579–598

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ghani JA, Rizal M, Nuawi MZ, Ghazali MJ, Haron CHC (2011) Monitoring online cutting tool wear using low-cost technique and user-friendly GUI. Wear 271(9–10):2619–2624

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dutta S, Pal SK, Sen R (2016) Tool condition monitoring in turning by applying machine vision. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 138(5):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ambhore N, Kamble D, Chinchanikar S, Wayal V (2015) Tool condition monitoring system: a review. Mater Today Proc 2(4–5):3419–3428

    Google Scholar 

  10. Teti R, Jemielniak K, O’Donnell G, Dornfeld D (2010) Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(2):717–739

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rao CHS, Rao DN, Rao RNS (2006) Online prediction of diffusion wear on the flank through tool tip temperature in turning using artificial neural networks. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 220(12):2069–2076

    Google Scholar 

  12. Serin G, Gudelek MU, Ozbayoglu AM, Unver HO (2017) Estimation of parameters for the free-form machining with deep neural network. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp 2102–2111. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2017.8258158

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Widodo A, Yang BS (2007) Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Process 21(6):2560–2574

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saimurugan M, Ramachandran KI, Sugumaran V, Sakthivel NR (2011) Multi component fault diagnosis of rotational mechanical system based on decision tree and support vector machine. Expert Syst Appl 38(4):3819–3826

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haykin SS (1999) Neural networks : a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall

  16. Lauro CH, Brandão LC, Baldo D, Reis RA, Davim JP (2014) Monitoring and processing signal applied in machining processes - a review. Meas J Int Meas Confed 58:73–86

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kothuru A, Nooka SP, Liu R (2018) Audio-based condition monitoring in milling of the workpiece material with the hardness variation using support vector machines and convolutional neural networks, ASME 2018 13th Int. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Conf. MSEC 2018, vol. 4, no. November 2018, pp 1–9

  18. Kothuru A, Nooka SP, Liu R (2018) Application of audible sound signals for tool wear monitoring using machine learning techniques in end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(9–12):3797–3808

    Google Scholar 

  19. Olufayo O, Abou-El-Hossein K (2015) Tool life estimation based on acoustic emission monitoring in end-milling of H13 mould-steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(1–4):39–51

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li X (2002) A brief review: acoustic emission method for tool wear monitoring during turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(2):157–165

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kakade S, Vijayaraghavan L, Krishnamurthy R (1994) In-process tool wear and chip-form monitoring in face milling operation using acoustic emission. J Mater Process Technol 44(3–4):207–214

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marinescu I, Axinte DA (2008) A critical analysis of effectiveness of acoustic emission signals to detect tool and workpiece malfunctions in milling operations. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(10):1148–1160

    Google Scholar 

  23. Antić A, Popović B, Krstanović L, Obradović R, Milošević M (2018) Novel texture-based descriptors for tool wear condition monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 98:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  24. Du Kim J, Choi IH (1996) Development of a tool failure detection system using multi-sensors. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 36(8):861–870

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wu D, Jennings C, Terpenny J, Kumara S, Gao RX (2018) Cloud-based parallel machine learning for tool wear prediction. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 140(4):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang XY, Lu X, Wang S, Wang W, Li WD (2018) A multi-sensor based online tool condition monitoring system for milling process. Procedia CIRP 72:1136–1141

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chen SL, Jen YW (2000) Data fusion neural network for tool condition monitoring in CNC milling machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(3):381–400

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mali R, Telsang MT, Gupta TVK (2017) Real time tool wear condition monitoring in hard turning of Inconel 718 using sensor fusion system. Mater Today Proc 4(8):8605–8612

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kious M, Ouahabi A, Boudraa M, Serra R, Cheknane A (2010) Detection process approach of tool wear in high speed milling. Meas J Int Meas Confed 43(10):1439–1446

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rmili W, Ouahabi A, Serra R, Leroy R (2016) An automatic system based on vibratory analysis for cutting tool wear monitoring. Meas J Int Meas Confed 77:117–123

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liang SY, Hecker RL, Landers RG (2002) Machining process monitoring and control: the state-of-the-art. ASME Int Mech Eng Congr Expo Proc 126(May 2004):599–610

    Google Scholar 

  32. Abellan-Nebot JV, Romero Subirón F (2010) A review of machining monitoring systems based on artificial intelligence process models. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47(1–4):237–257

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dimla DE, Lister PM (2000) On-line metal cutting tool condition monitoring. II: tool-state classification using multi-layer perceptron neural networks. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(5):769–781

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bombiński S, Błazejak K, Nejman M, Jemielniak K (2016) Sensor signal segmentation for tool condition monitoring. Procedia CIRP 46:155–160

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nouri M, Fussell BK, Ziniti BL, Linder E (2015) Real-time tool wear monitoring in milling using a cutting condition independent method. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 89:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cho S, Asfour S, Onar A, Kaundinya N (2005) Tool breakage detection using support vector machine learning in a milling process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(3):241–249

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wang J, Xie J, Zhao R, Zhang L, Duan L (2017) Multisensory fusion based virtual tool wear sensing for ubiquitous manufacturing. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 45:47–58

    Google Scholar 

  38. Caggiano A, Angelone R, Napolitano F, Nele L, Teti R (2018) Dimensionality reduction of sensorial features by principal component analysis for ANN machine learning in tool condition monitoring of CFRP drilling. Procedia CIRP 78:307–312

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rizal M, Ghani JA, Nuawi MZ, Haron CHC (2013) Online tool wear prediction system in the turning process using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Appl Soft Comput J 13(4):1960–1968

    Google Scholar 

  40. Venkata Rao K, Murthy BSN, Mohan Rao N (2013) Cutting tool condition monitoring by analyzing surface roughness, work piece vibration and volume of metal removed for AISI 1040 steel in boring. Meas J Int Meas Confed 46(10):4075–4084

    Google Scholar 

  41. Özel T, Karpat Y (Apr. 2005) Predictive modeling of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning using regression and neural networks. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(4–5):467–479

    Google Scholar 

  42. Korkut I, Acir A, Boy M (Sep. 2011) Application of regression and artificial neural network analysis in modelling of tool-chip interface temperature in machining. Expert Syst Appl 38(9):11651–11656

    Google Scholar 

  43. Onal AC, Berat Sezer O, Ozbayoglu M, Dogdu E (2018) MIS-IoT: modular intelligent server based Internet of Things framework with big data and machine learning, in Proceedings - 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data. Big Data 2019:2270–2279

    Google Scholar 

  44. Smola A, Vishwanathan SVN, Clara S (2008) Introduction to machine learning, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  45. Russell SJ, Norvig P, Canny JF, Malik JM, Edwards DD (1995) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach, 3rd edn. Pearson Education Inc., USA

    Google Scholar 

  46. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A Courville, (2016) Deep learning. Available: https://www.deeplearningbook.org/.

  47. Singh N, Singh DP, Pant B (2018) A comprehensive study of big data machine learning approaches and challenges. Proc - 2017 Int Conf Next Gener Comput Inf Syst ICNGCIS 2017:58–63

  48. Soniya SP, Singh L (2016) A review on advances in deep learning. 2015 IEEE Work Comput Intell Theor Appl Futur Dir WCI 2015:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  49. Deshmukh PS (2018) Travel time prediction using neural networks: a literature review, 2018 Int. Conf. Information, Commun. Eng. Technol. ICICET 2018, no. xi, pp 1–5

  50. Bhandare A, Bhide M, Gokhale P, Chandavarkar R (2016) Applications of convolutional neural networks. Int J Comput Sci Inf Technol 7(5):2206–2215

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ramos S, Gehrig S, Pinggera P, Franke U, Rother C (2016) Detecting unexpected obstacles for self-driving cars: fusing deep learning and geometric modeling. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium

  52. Pak M, Kim S (2018) A review of deep learning in image recognition, Proc. 2017 4th Int. Conf. Comput. Appl. Inf. Process. Technol. CAIPT 2017, vol. 2018-Janua, pp 1–3

  53. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv Neural Inf Proces Syst. https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386

  54. Zeiler MD, Fergus R (2014) Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 8689 LNCS, no. PART 1, pp 818–833

  55. Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia YQ, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Vanhoucke V, Rabinovich A (2015) Going deeper with convolutions. In: Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., vol. 07-12-June, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  56. Molchanov P, Gupta S, Kim K, Kautz J (2015) Hand gesture recognition with 3D convolutional neural networks. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, vol 2015-October, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  57. Molchanov P, Yang X, Gupta S, Kim K, Tyree S, Kautz J (2016) Online detection and classification of dynamic hand gestures with recurrent 3D convolutional neural networks. In: Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., vol. 2016-Decem, pp 4207–4215

  58. X. Chai, Z. Liu, F. Yin, Z. Liu, and X. Chen, Two streams recurrent neural networks for large-scale continuous gesture recognition, Proc Int Conf Pattern Recogn, vol. 0, pp. 31–36, 2016.

  59. Wang P, Li W, Liu S, Gao Z, Tang C, Ogunbona P (2017) Large-scale isolated gesture recognition using convolutional neural networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2016.7899599

  60. Khalajzadeh H, Mansouri M, Teshnehlab M (2014) Face recognition using convolutional neural network and simple logistic classifier, in Advances in Intelligent Systems and. Computing 223:197–207

    Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang X, Peng M, Chen T (2016) Face recognition from near-infrared images with convolutional neural network, 2016 8th Int. Conf Wirel Commun Signal Process WCSP 2016:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ramaiah NP, Ijjina EP, Mohan CK (2015) Illumination invariant face recognition using convolutional neural networks. In: 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. Signal Process. Informatics, Commun. Energy Syst. SPICES 2015, pp 1–4

  63. Pinheiro PO, Com RC (2014) B1b_CRFasRNN 32

  64. Wang P, Cao Y, Shen C, Liu L, Shen HT (2015) Temporal pyramid pooling based convolutional neural networks for action recognition. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2016.2576761

  65. Simonyan K, Zisserman A Two-stream convolutional networks for action recognition in videos. Adv Neural Inf Proces Syst

  66. Yang Q, He Z, Ge F, Zhang Y (2017) Sequence-to-sequence prediction of personal computer software by recurrent neural network. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, vol 2017-May, pp 934–940

    Google Scholar 

  67. Sharma P, Singh A (2017) Era of deep neural networks: a review, 8th Int. Conf Comput Commun Netw Technol 2017

  68. N. Neverova, C. Wolf, G. Paci, G. Sommavilla, G. W. Taylor, and F. Nebout, A multi-scale approach to gesture detection and recognition, Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis, pp. 484–491, 2013.

  69. Tsironi E, Barros P, Wermter S (2016) Gesture recognition with a convolutional long short-term memory recurrent neural network, ESANN 2016 - 24th Eur. Symp. Artif. Neural Networks, pp 213–218

    Google Scholar 

  70. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (Nov. 1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9(8):1735–1780

    Google Scholar 

  71. A. Graves, A. Mohamed, and G. Hinton (2013) Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6638947

  72. Sundermeyer M, Ney H, Schluter R (2015) From feedforward to recurrent LSTM neural networks for language modeling. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 23(3):517–529

    Google Scholar 

  73. Mayer NM (2017) Echo state condition at the critical point. Entropy 19(1)

  74. Ororbia A, Mikolov T, Reitter D (2017) Learning simpler language models with the delta recurrent neural network framework. Arxiv:1–27

  75. Day MY, Da Lin Y (2017) Deep learning for sentiment analysis on Google play consumer review. In: Proc. - 2017 IEEE Int. Conf. Inf. Reuse Integr. IRI 2017, vol 2017-Janua, pp 382–388

    Google Scholar 

  76. Arbib MA (1995) The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. MIT Press

  77. Sutton RS, Barto AG (2017) Reinforcement learning an introduction. The MIT press

  78. Aghazadeh F, Tahan A, Thomas M (2018) Tool condition monitoring using spectral subtraction and convolutional neural networks in milling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(9–12):3217–3227

    Google Scholar 

  79. Chen Y, Jin Y, Jiri G (2018) Predicting tool wear with multi-sensor data using deep belief networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99(5–8):1917–1926

    Google Scholar 

  80. Shao SY, Sun WJ, Yan RQ, Wang P, Gao RX (2017) A deep learning approach for fault diagnosis of induction motors in manufacturing. Chin J Mech Eng (English Ed) 30(6):1347–1356

    Google Scholar 

  81. Riera-Guasp M, Antonino-Daviu JA, Capolino GA (2015) Advances in electrical machine, power electronic, and drive condition monitoring and fault detection: state of the art. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(3):1746–1759

    Google Scholar 

  82. Zhao R, Yan R, Chen Z, Mao K, Wang P, Gao RX (2019) Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 115:213–237

    Google Scholar 

  83. Li X, Zhang W, Ding Q, Sun JQ (2018) Intelligent rotating machinery fault diagnosis based on deep learning using data augmentation. J Intell Manuf

  84. Fu Y, Zhang Y, Gao H, Mao T, Zhou H, Sun R, Li D (2019) Automatic feature constructing from vibration signals for machining state monitoring. J Intell Manuf 30(3):995–1008

    Google Scholar 

  85. Liu H, Li L, Ma J (2016) Rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on STFT-deep learning and sound signals. Shock Vib. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6127479

  86. Jia F, Lei Y, Guo L, Lin J, Xing S (Jan. 2018) A neural network constructed by deep learning technique and its application to intelligent fault diagnosis of machines. Neurocomputing 272:619–628

    Google Scholar 

  87. Chen Z, Deng S, Chen X, Li C, Sanchez RV, Qin H (2017) Deep neural networks-based rolling bearing fault diagnosis. Microelectron Reliab 75:327–333

    Google Scholar 

  88. Deng S, Cheng Z, Li C, Yao X, Chen Z, Sanchez RV (2017) Rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on deep Boltzmann machines. In: Proceedings of 2016 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference, PHM-Chengdu 2016

    Google Scholar 

  89. Li C, Sánchez RV, Zurita G, Cerrada M, Cabrera D (2016) Fault diagnosis for rotating machinery using vibration measurement deep statistical feature learning. Sensors (Switzerland) 16(6)

  90. Guo X, Chen L, Shen C (Nov. 2016) Hierarchical adaptive deep convolution neural network and its application to bearing fault diagnosis. Meas J Int Meas Confed 93:490–502

    Google Scholar 

  91. Fuan W, Hongkai J, Haidong S, Wenjing D, Shuaipeng W (2017) An adaptive deep convolutional neural network for rolling bearing fault diagnosis. Meas Sci Technol 28(9)

  92. Dornfeld DA, DeVries MF (1990) Neural network sensor fusion for tool condition monitoring. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 39(1):101–105

    Google Scholar 

  93. Hsieh WH, Lu MC, Chiou SJ (2012) Application of backpropagation neural network for spindle vibration-based tool wear monitoring in micro-milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61(1–4):53–61

    Google Scholar 

  94. Srinivasan A, Dornfeld D, Bhinge R (2016) Integrated vibration and acoustic data fusion for chatter and tool condition classification in milling, in International Symposium on Flexible Automation, ISFA 201, pp 263–266

  95. Quiza R, Figueira L, Davim JP (2008) Comparing statistical models and artificial neural networks on predicting the tool wear in hard machining D2 AISI steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37(7–8):641–648

    Google Scholar 

  96. Silva RG, Wilcox SJ, Reuben RL (2006) Development of a system for monitoring tool wear using artificial intelligence techniques. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 220(8):1333–1346

    Google Scholar 

  97. Rangwala S, Dornfeld D (1990) Sensor integration using neural networks for intelligent tool condition monitoring. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 112(3):219–228

    Google Scholar 

  98. Griffin JM, Doberti AJ, Hernández V, Miranda NA, Vélez MA (2017) Multiple classification of the force and acceleration signals extracted during multiple machine processes: part 1 intelligent classification from an anomaly perspective. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(1-4):811–823

    Google Scholar 

  99. Griffin JM, Doberti AJ, Hernández V, Miranda NA, Vélez MA (2017) Multiple classification of the force and acceleration signals extracted during multiple machine processes: part 2 intelligent classification from an anomaly perspective. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(9-12):3207–3217

    Google Scholar 

  100. Rehorn AG, Jiang J, Orban PE (2005) State-of-the-art methods and results in tool condition monitoring: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26(7-8):693–710

    Google Scholar 

  101. T. Mohanraj, S. Shankar, R. Rajasekar, N.R. Sakthivel, and A. Pramanik, Tool condition monitoring techniques in milling process—a review, J Mater Res Technol, In Press, 2019.

  102. Zhou Y, Xue W (2018) Review of tool condition monitoring methods in milling processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(5-8):2509–2523

    Google Scholar 

  103. Duro JA, Padget JA, Bowen CR, Kim HA, Nassehi A (2016) Multi-sensor data fusion framework for CNC machining monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 66:505–520

    Google Scholar 

  104. Li X, Hu Y, Li M, Zheng J (2020) Fault diagnostics between different type of components: a transfer learning approach. Appl Soft Comput 86(105950)

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) through project grant no. 118M414.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara, Turkey

    G. Serin, B. Sener & H. O. Unver

  2. Department of Computer Engineering, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara, Turkey

    A. M. Ozbayoglu

Authors
  1. G. Serin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Sener
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. M. Ozbayoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. O. Unver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. O. Unver.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Serin, G., Sener, B., Ozbayoglu, A.M. et al. Review of tool condition monitoring in machining and opportunities for deep learning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109, 953–974 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05449-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05449-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation