Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Microhardness and residual stress of dissimilar and thick aluminum plates AA7181-T7651 and AA7475-T7351 using bobbin, top, bottom, and double-sided FSW methods

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Friction stir welding (FSW) is a relatively new manufacturing process (invented in 1991 at the Welding Institute, UK) and more than 5000 scientific articles have been published in the past 10 years in indexed journals demonstrating the robustness of the research. However, further research is necessary to ensure safe use of the technique for structural components, particularly with reference to the aeronautics industry. Residual stresses and their consequences on the life of welded products must be fully understood, in addition to their correlations with other properties such as hardness, strength, and microstructure. This paper is a part of the research being conducted to evaluate the impact of four FSW techniques (bobbin, top-sided, bottom-sided, and double-sided) on the mechanical properties in dissimilar thick joints (12.7 mm) of aluminum alloys (AA7181-T7651 and AA7475-T7351) used in the aeronautics industry. The residual stresses were measured using the incremental blind hole technique and analyzed using the integral method. The longitudinal residual stresses were all positive, with values between 100 and 200 MPa in the stir zone, whereas the transverse ones were all negative, with values between 0 and − 100 MPa. It was possible to verify that the Bobbin process produced lower values of residual stresses and demonstrated better stability in its distribution compared to all the other FSW methods tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thomas WM, Nicholas ED, Needham JC, Murch MG, Temple-Smith P, Dawes CJ (1991) Improvements relating to friction welding. GB patent no:9125978–9125978

  2. Wu H, Chen Y, Strong D, Prangnell P (2015) Stationary shoulder FSW for joining high strength aluminum alloys. J Mater Process Technol 221:187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Padhy GK, Wu CS, Gao S (2017) Friction stir based welding and processing technologies - processes, parameters, microstructures and applications: a review. J Mater Sci Technol 14:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang FF, Li WY, Shen J, Wen Q, Santos JF (2018) Improving weld formability by a novel dual-rotation bobbin tool friction stir welding. J Mater Sci Technol 34:135–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Esmaily M, Mortazavi N, Osikowicz W, Hindsefelt H, Svensson JE, Halvarsson M, Martin J, Johansson LG (2016) Bobbin and conventional friction stir welding of thick extruded AA6005-T6 profiles. Mater Des 108:114–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu W, Liu J (2015) Microstructure evolution along thickness in double-side friction stir welded 7085 Al alloy. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 25:3212–3222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goebel J, Reimann M, Norman A, Santos FF (2017) Semi-stationary shoulder bobbin tool friction stir welding of AA2198-T851. J Mater Process Technol 245:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu W, Luo Y, Zhang W, Fu MW (2018) Comparative study on local and global mechanical properties of bobbin tool and conventional friction stir welded 7085-T7452 aluminum thick plate. J Mater Sci Technol 34:173–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cetkin E, Çelik YH, Temiz S (2019) Microstructure and mechanical properties of AA7075/AA5182 jointed by FSW. J Mater Process Technol 268:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bertrand R, Robe H, Texier D, Zedan Y, Feulvarch E, Bocher P (2019) Analysis of AA2XXX/AA7XXX friction stir welds. J Mater Process Technol 271:312–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jimenez-Mena N, Sapanathan T, Drezet JM, Pirling T, Jacques PJ, Simar A (2019) Residual stresses of friction melt bonded aluminum/steel joints determined by neutron diffraction. J Mater Process Technol 266:651–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu H, Zheng B, Lai X (2018) A modeling study of welding stress induced by friction stir welding. J Mater Process Technol 254:213–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Papan H, Bahemmat P, Haghpanahi M, Valipour A (2014) Ultrasonic measurements of residual stresses caused by severe thermomechanical deformation during FSW. Exp Mech 54:1587–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ji P, Yang Z, Zhang L, Ji V, Klosek V (2015) Residual stress distribution and microstructure in the friction stir weld of 7075 aluminum alloy. J Mater Sci 50:7262–7270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aval HJ (2015) Microstructure and residual stress distributions in friction stir welding of dissimilar aluminum alloys. Mater Des 87:405–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Haghshenas M, Gharghouri MA, Bhakhri V, Klassen RJ, Gerlich AP (2017) Assessing residual stresses in friction stir welding: neutron diffraction and nanoindentation methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:3733–3747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cabibbo M, Forcellese A, Mehtedi E, Simoncini M (2014) Double side friction stir welding of AA6082 sheets: microstructure and nanoindentation characterization. Mater Sci Eng A 590:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sahu PK, Pal S (2017) Mechanical properties of dissimilar thickness aluminum alloy weld by single/double pass FSW. J Mater Process Technol 243:442–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmeda MMZ, Ataya S, Seleman MMS, Ammar HR, Ahmed E (2017) Friction stir welding of similar and dissimilar AA7075 and AA5083. J Mater Process Technol 242:77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zapata J, Toro M, López D (2016) Residual stresses in friction stir dissimilar welding of aluminum alloys. J Mater Process Technol 229:121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Delijaicov.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Delijaicov, S., Rodrigues, M., Farias, A. et al. Microhardness and residual stress of dissimilar and thick aluminum plates AA7181-T7651 and AA7475-T7351 using bobbin, top, bottom, and double-sided FSW methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108, 277–287 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05370-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05370-2

Keywords

Navigation