Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

ARIMA-GMDH: a low-order integrated approach for predicting and optimizing the additive manufacturing process parameters

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel data-driven approach for predicting and optimizing the additive manufacturing process parameters. The integrated scheme consists of three popular algorithms: (1) group method for data handling (GMDH) as the engine of neural networks, (2) autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) for characterizing spatial collinearity of the multiple response, and (3) indirect optimization on the basis of self-organization (IOSO) to adopt the emerged correlated multi-response optimization problem. As a numerical case study, a computer-generated fused deposition modeling data tested the introduced algorithms. The finite element (FE) simulation model consists the multi-layer residual stresses as targets, in respect of printing speeds as process parameters. The residual stresses predicted by the low-order integrated ARIMA-GMDH variants correlate well with the FE simulations. This approach provides a viable data-driven alternative for computationally based rapid prototyping and additive manufacturing processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ISO/ASTM 52900:2015 (ASTM F2792), Additive manufacturing, General principles, Terminology, ISO/ASTM (2015)

  2. Chan SL, Lu Y, Wang Y (2017) Data-driven cost estimation for additive manufacturing in cybermanufacturing. J Manuf Syst 46:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Singha S, Ramakrishna S, Singh R (2017) Material issues in additive manufacturing: a review. J Manuf Process 25:185– 200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Masood SH (2014) Advances in fused deposition modeling. Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering 10:69–91

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bártolo, Jorge P (2011) Stereolithography, materials, processes and applications. Springer

  6. Deckard CR (1986) Method and apparatus for producing parts by selective sintering. USA Patent US4863538A, 17 10

  7. Gu DD, Meiners W, Wissenbach K, Poprawe R (2012) Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms. Int Mater Rev 57(3):133–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marwah O, Sharif S, Ibrahim M, Mohamad E, Idris MH (2016) Direct rapid prototyping evaluation on multijet and fused deposition modeling patterns for investment casting. J Mater Des Appl 230:5

    Google Scholar 

  9. statista, Most used 3D printing technologies in 2017 and 2018, www.statista.com, 2017-2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/560304/worldwide-survey-3d-printing-top-technologies/. [Accessed 24 12 2018]

  10. Heyes AL, Smith DA (2004) Rapid technique for wind-tunnel model manufacture. J Aircr 41(2):413–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Giunta AA, Eldred MS, Wojtkiewicz SF (2003) Overview of modern design of experiments methods for computational. In: AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit

  12. Wiedemann HJB (1999) Strategies and applications for rapid product and process development in Daimler-Benz AG computers in industries. Comput Ind 39(1):11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ventola CL (2014) Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. Pharm Therapeut 39 (11):704–711

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daniel YW, Panda B, Paul SC, Mohamed NAN, Tan M, Leong KF (2017) 3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review. Virt Phys Prototyp 12(3):261–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jian-Yuan L, An J, Chua KC (2017) Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials. Appl Mater Today 7:120–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas D (2016) Costs, benefits, and adoption of additive manufacturing: a supply chain perspective. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(5-8):1857–1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mukherjee T, Zhang W, DebRoy T (2017) An improved prediction of residual stresses and distortion in additive manufacturing. Comput Mater Sci 126:360–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu H, Chen TT (2018) Quality control issues in 3D-printing manufacturing: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 24:3

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bellini A, Geri S (2003) Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 9(4):252–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik J, Nikzad M, Azadmanjiri J (2016) Effect of process parameters on dynamic mechanical performance of FDM PC/ABS printed parts through design of experiment. J Mater Eng Perform 25(7):2922–2935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, Gou J, Hui D (2017) 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Compos Part B Eng 110(1):442–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas-Seale L, Kirkman-Brown J, Attallah M, Espino MD, Shepherd DE (2017) The barriers to the progression of additive manufacture: perspectives from UK industry. Int J Prod Econ 198:104–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Guessasma S, Zhang W, Zhu J, Belhabib S, Nouri H (2015) Challenges of additive manufacturing technologies from an optimisation perspective. Int J Simul Multidiscip Des Optim 6:A9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bayraktar O, Uzun G, akrolu R, Guldas A (2016) Experimental study on the 3D-printed plastic parts and predicting the mechanical properties using artificial neural networks: mechanical properties of 3D-printed plastic parts. Polym Adv Technol 28(8):1044– 1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rayegani F, Onwubolu G (2014) Fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (GMDH) and differential evolution (DE). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(1–4):509–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2010) A hybrid ANN-BFOA approach for optimization of FDM process parameters. In: A hybrid ANN-BFOA approach for optimization of FDM process parameters, SEMCCO Chennai, India

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Panda KS, Padhee S, Sood KA, Mahapatra SS (2009) Optimization of fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameters using bacterial foraging technique. Intell Inf Manag 2(1):89–97

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang W, Wu AS, Sun J, Quan J, Gu B, Sun B, Cotton C, Heider D, Chou TW (2017) Characterization of residual stress and deformation in additively manufactured ABS polymer and composite specimens. Compos Sci Technol 150:102–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Egorov I (1998) Indirect optimization on the basis of self-organization. Air Force Eng Acad 2:683–691

    Google Scholar 

  30. (2017). Abaqus analysis user’s guide, Abaqus 2017 Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp.

  31. Courter B, Savane V, Bi J, Dev S, Hansen CJ (2017) Finite element simulation of the fused deposition modelling process. Nafems World Congress. Stockholm

  32. Onwubolu G (2016) GMDH-methodology and implementation in MatLab. Imperial College Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Mohammed MAA (2016) Chapter 3: GMDH multilayered algorithm in MATLAB. In: GMDH-methodology and implementation in MATLAB. Imperial College Press, London, pp 75–124

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Kondo T, Pandya A (2000) GMDH-type neural networks: with radial basis functions and their application to medical image recognition of the brain. In: SICE annual conference. International Session Papers (IEEE Cat. No.00TH8545). Iizuka

  35. Srivastava M, Badal D, Jain RK (2010) Regression and ARIMA hybrid model for new bug prediction. Int J Comput Sci Eng 2(8):2622–2628

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shabri A, Samsudin R (2014) A hybrid GMDH and box-Jenkins models in time series forecasting. Appl Math Sci, 3051–3062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shabri A, Samsudin R (2014) Fishery landing forecasting using wavelet-based autoregressive integrated moving average models. Math Probl Eng, 2015

  38. Mosavi A (2010) Multiobjective optimization using indirect optimization on the basis of self-organization. In: Wseas conferences

  39. Asadollahi-Yazdi E, Lafon P, Gardan J (2018) Multi-objective optimization of additive manufacturing process. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(11):152–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Yan Z (2010) Traj-ARIMA: a spatial-time series model for network-constrained trajectory. In: Third international workshop on computational transportation science, San Jose

  42. Matsumoto M, Abe J, Yoshimura M (1993) A multiobjective optimization strategy with priority ranking of the design objectives. J Mech Des 115(4):784–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Farlow JS (1981) The GMDH algorithm of Ivakhnenko. Am Stat 35(4):210–215

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pisuchpen R (2012) Integration of JIT flexible manufacturing, assembly and disassembly using a simulation approach. Assem Autom 32(1):51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Steeda CA, Halsey W, Dehof R, Yoder SL, Paquit V, Powers S (2017) Falcon: visual analysis of large, irregularly sampled, and multivariate. Comput Graph 63:50–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wold S, Sjstrm M, Carlson R, Lundstedt T, Hellberg S, Skagerberg B, Wikstrm C, hman J (1986) Mltivariate design. Analytica Chimica Acta 191:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Beleites C, Neugebauer U, Bocklitz T, Popp J (2013) Sample size planning for classification models. Anal Chim Acta 720:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Courter B, Savane V, Bi J, Dev S, Hansen CJ (2017) Finite element simulation of the fused deposition modelling process, conference: NAFEMS World Congress. Stockholm

  49. Cattenone A, Morganti S, Alaimo G, Auricchio F (2018) Finite element analysis of additive manufacturing based on fused deposition modeling: distortions prediction and comparison with experimental data. J Manuf Sci Eng 141:1

    Google Scholar 

  50. Favaloro A, Brenken B, Barocio E, Pipes B (2017) Simulation of polymeric composites additive manufacturing using Abaqus, conference: dassault systemes’ science in the age of experience. Chicago

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Asia Haque and Megan Scribner for their contributions at the early stage of this research.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the start-up funds and multidisciplinary seed funds at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Dartmouth, MA, 02747, USA

    Osama Aljarrah, Jun Li & Wenzhen Huang

  2. Department of Mathematics, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Dartmouth, MA, 02747, USA

    Alfa Heryudono

  3. Dassault Systémes, Johnston, RI, 02919, USA

    Jing Bi

Authors
  1. Osama Aljarrah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wenzhen Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alfa Heryudono
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jing Bi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Li.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aljarrah, O., Li, J., Huang, W. et al. ARIMA-GMDH: a low-order integrated approach for predicting and optimizing the additive manufacturing process parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106, 701–717 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04315-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04315-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation