Skip to main content
Log in

Robust adaptive exponentially weighted moving average control charts with applications of manufacturing processes

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Statistical process control (SPC) has its own importance in the field of quality control. In SPC, control charts are significant tools to monitor process parameters, and exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control chart is one such tool. It is a memory-type chart, which is used to target mainly the smaller shifts in the process parameters. Adaptive EWMA (AEWMA) scheme is used to identify small as well as large shifts. EWMA and AEWMA are based on the assumption of normality, which is quite hard to find in practice, and there are many situations where outliers are occasionally present. In the current study, we have proposed four robust adaptive EWMA schemes for monitoring process location parameter. We have investigated their performance under uncontaminated normal and contaminated normal environments. We have carried out comparisons amongst different competing charts based on average run length (ARL), standard deviation of run length (SDRL) and different percentiles of run length distribution. Two examples related to manufacturing processes are also provided for practical implementation of the proposed schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roberts S (1959) Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages. Technometrics 1(3):239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Page E (1954) Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 41:100–115

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Lucas JM, Saccucci MS (1990) Exponentially weighted moving average control schemes: properties and enhancements. Technometrics 32(1):1–12

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Capizzi G, Masarotto G (2003) An adaptive exponentially weighted moving average control chart. Technometrics 45(3):199–207

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Yashchin E (1987) Some aspects of the theory of statistical control schemes. IBM J Res Dev 31(2):199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lucas JM, Crosier RB (1982) Fast initial response for CUSUM quality-control schemes: give your CUSUM a head start. Technometrics 24(3):199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tatum LG (1997) Robust estimation of the process standard deviation for control charts. Technometrics 39(2):127–141

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Moustafa A, Mokhtar BA (1999) New robust statistical process control chart for location. Qual Eng 12(2):149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Borror CM, Montgomery DC, Runger GC (2000) Robustness of the EWMA control chart to non-normality. Qual Control Appl Stat 45(2):125–128

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Testik MC, Runger GC, Borror CM (2003) Robustness properties of multivariate EWMA control charts. Qual Reliab Eng Int 19(1):31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abbas N, Riaz M, Does RJ (2013) Mixed exponentially weighted moving average cumulative sum charts for process monitoring. Qual Reliab Eng Int 29(3):345–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Mast J, Roes KC (2004) Robust individuals control chart for exploratory analysis. Qual Eng 16(3):407–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maravelakis PE, Panaretos J, Psarakis S (2005) An examination of the robustness to non-normality of the EWMA control charts for the dispersion. Commun Stat Simul Comput 34(4):1069–1079

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Abu-Shawiesh MO (2008) A simple robust control chart based on MAD. J Math Stat 4(2):102–107

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Shahriari H, Maddahi A, Shokoui AH (2009) A robust dispersion control chart based on M-estimate. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Vol. 2. No. 4(2009):297–307

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nazir HZ, Riaz M, Does RJ, Abbas N (2013) Robust CUSUM control charting. Qual Eng 25(3):211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alkahtani SS (2013) Robustness of DEWMA versus EWMA control charts to non-normal processes. J Mod Appl Stat Methods 12(1):148–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zaman B, Lee MH, Riaz M, Abujiya MAR (2017) An adaptive EWMA scheme-based CUSUM accumulation error for efficient monitoring of process location. Qual Reliab Eng Int 33(8):2463–2482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Abbas N (2018) Homogeneously weighted moving average control chart with an application in substrate manufacturing process. Comput Ind Eng 120:460–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Haq A, Gulzar R, Khoo MB (2018) An efficient adaptive EWMA control chart for monitoring the process mean. Qual Reliab Eng Int 34(4):563–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abid M, Nazir HZ, Riaz M, Lin Z (2018) In-control robustness comparison of different control charts. Trans Inst Meas Control 40(13):3860–3871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huber PJ (1981) Robust statistics. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Beaton AE, Tukey JW (1974) The fitting of power series, meaning polynomials, illustrated on based spectroscopic data. Technometrics 19:161–164

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Rousseeuw, PJ (1991) Tutorial to Robust Statistics. Journal of Chemometrics 5(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dixon WJ, Massey FJ (1969) Introduction to statistical analysis, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Weisberg HF (1992). Central tendency and variability. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Application in Social Sciences, Series no. 07-038. A. Virding, Ed. Newbury Park: Sage.

  27. Tukey JW (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading: Addison Wesley

  28. Wang T, Li Y, Cui H (2007) On weighted randomly trimmed means. J Syst Sci Complex 20(1):47–65

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Hossain MP, Sanusi RA, Omar MH, Riaz M (2018) On designing Maxwell CUSUM control chart: an efficient way to monitor failure rates in boring processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100(5–8):1923–1930 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mahmood T, Riaz M, Omar MH, Xie M (2018) Alternative methods for the simultaneous monitoring of simple linear profile parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(5–8):2851–2871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Riaz M, Ahmad S (2016) On designing a new Tukey-EWMA control chart for process monitoring. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(1–4):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zaman B, Riaz M, Ahmad S, Abbasi SA (2015) On artificial neural networking-based process monitoring under bootstrapping using runs rules schemes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(1–4):311–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ahmad S, Riaz M, Hussain S, Abbasi SA (2018) On auxiliary information-based control charts for autocorrelated processes with application in manufacturing industry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100(5–8):1965–1980 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  34. Riaz M, Mahmood T, Abbasi SA, Abbas N, Ahmad S (2017) Linear profile monitoring using EWMA structure under ranked set schemes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(5–8):2751–2775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zaman B, Abbas N, Riaz M, Lee MH (2016) Mixed CUSUM-EWMA chart for monitoring process dispersion. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86(9–12):3025–3039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tran K, Castagliola P, Balakrishnan N (2017) On the performance of the Shewhart median chart in presence of measurement error. Qual Reliab Eng Int 33(5):1019–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Crowder SV (1987) Average run lengths of exponentially weighted moving average control charts. J Qual Technol 19(3):161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Crowder SV (1989) Design of exponentially weighted moving average schemes. J Qual Technol 21(3):155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Haq A (2013) A new hybrid exponentially weighted moving average control chart for monitoring process mean. Qual Reliab Eng Int 29(7):1015–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Moustafa A (2009) A control chart based on robust estimators for monitoring the process mean of a quality characteristic. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 26(5):480–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schoonhoven M, Nazir HZ, Riaz M, Does RJ (2011) Robust location estimators for the X-bar control chart. J Qual Technol 43(4):363–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Riaz M, Abbasi SA, Ahmad S, Zaman B (2014) On efficient phase II process monitoring charts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(9–12):2263–2274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Montgomery DC (2009) Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 6th ed. Wiley, New York

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hafiz Zafar Nazir.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nazir, H.Z., Hussain, T., Akhtar, N. et al. Robust adaptive exponentially weighted moving average control charts with applications of manufacturing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105, 733–748 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04206-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04206-y

Keywords

Navigation