Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing CW-GMAW in direct current electrode positive (DCEP) and direct current electrode negative (DCEN)

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gas metal arc welding (GMAW) with direct current electrode negative (DCEN) can offer some advantages over direct current electrode positive (DCEP) welding, such as a higher electrode melting rate and lower heat input imposed onto the workpiece. Despite these advantages, DCEN is not commonly used in field applications due to instabilities caused by arc climb and the volatile repelled metal transfer mode across the arc. This work reports a comparison between DCEP and DCEN in natural spray transfer mode using a welding power source operating in constant voltage (CV). It aims to assess the feasibility of DCEN in cold wire gas metal arc welding (CW-GMAW) comparing the results obtained in DCEN with previous results obtained in DCEP for the same welding parameters. During experiments, the current and voltage were acquired with synchronized high-speed video to study the arc dynamics. Bead-on-plate welds were deposited onto AISI 1020 steel flat bars. Three cross sections for each bead were cut and metallographically examined to compare bead geometry. Results suggest that the cold wire feeding can suppress arc climb in DCEN welding, consequently improving the arc stability and bead finish. Moreover, the DCEN welds suggest that the heat transferred to the weld pool is fundamental to accommodate high feed rates of cold wire. Lastly, the cross section results show that penetration, dilution, and HAZ area are lower in DCEN than in DCEP mode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Norrish J (1974) High deposition MIG-welding with electrode negative polarity. In: 3rd Intl. Conf. on Advances in Welding Processes. The welding Institute, Cambridge, UK., pp 121–128

    Google Scholar 

  2. Souza D, de Resende AA, Scotti A (2010) A qualitative model to explain the polarity influence on the fusion rate in the MIG/MAG process. Weld Int 24:934–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/09507110903569032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li P, Hurtig K, Högström M, Svensson LE, Scotti A (2018) A contribution to the study of negative polarity in GMA welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:2543–2553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1349-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cho J, Lee J-J, Bae S-H (2015) Heat input analysis of variable polarity arc welding of aluminum. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81:1273–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7292-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim K, Chung H (2017) Wire melting rate of alternating current gas metal arc welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90:1253–1263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9384-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cabral TS, Braga EM, Mendonça EAM, Scott A (2015) Influence of procedures and transfer modes in MAG welding in the reduction of deformations on marine structure panels. Weld Int 29:928–936. https://doi.org/10.1080/09507116.2014.932993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Costa ES, Assunção PDC, Dos Santos EBF, Feio LG, Bittencourt MSQ, Braga EM (2017) Residual stresses in cold-wire gas metal arc welding. Sci Technol Weld Join 22:706–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621718.2017.1306014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marques LFN, dos Santos EBF, Gerlich AP, Braga EM (2017) Fatigue life assessment of weld joints manufactured by GMAW and CW-GMAW processes. Sci Technol Weld Join 22:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621718.2016.1194735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ASTM (2009) Standard specification for general requirements for steel bars, carbon and alloy, hot-wrought. Changes i:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1520/A0029

  10. AWS (2005) AWS A5.28/A5.28M:2005 - Specification for low-alloy steel electrodes and rods for gas shielded arc welding, p 43

  11. LEM (1997) Current transducer LF 505-S / SP15, pp 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  12. LEM (2017) Voltage transducer LV 100-100 Data Sheet. In: 3

    Google Scholar 

  13. do NAS, Batista M de A, do NVC, Scotti A (2007) Assessment of electrical power calculation methods in arc welding and the consequences on the joint geometric, thermal and metallurgical predictions. Soldag Inspeção 12:97–106

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kodama S, Ikuno Y, Ichiyama Y, Baba N (2007) Process modeling of short-circuiting GMA welding and its application to arc sensor control. Nippon Steel Tech Rep 95:71–75

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hajossy R, Morva I (1994) Cathode and anode falls of arcs with fusible electrodes. J Phys D Appl Phys 27:2095–2101. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/27/10/016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ribeiro RA, dos Santos EBF, Assunção PDC, Braga EM, Gerlich AP (2018) Cold wire gas metal arc welding: droplet transfer and geometry. Weld J Res Suppl:21

  17. Cary HB (1989) Modern welding technology, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jenney CL, O’Brien A (2004) Welding handbook, 9th edn. AWS, Miami, FL

    Google Scholar 

  19. Murray PE, Scotti A (1999) Depth of penetration in gas metal arc welding. Sci Technol Weld Join 4:112–117. https://doi.org/10.1179/136217199101537644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fuerschbach PW (1994) A Dimensionless parameter model for arc welding processes. In: International Conference on Trends in Welding Research, Gatlinburg, TN, USA

  21. Mendez PF, Lu Y, Wang Y (2018) Scaling analysis of a moving point heat source in steady-state on a semi-infinite solid. J Heat Transfer 140:081301. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Scotti A, Rodrigues CEAL (2009) Determination of momentum as a mean of quantifying the mechanical energy delivered by droplets during MIG/MAG welding. Eur Phys J Appl Phys 45:11201. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjap:2008196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. DuPont JN, Marder AR (1996) Dilution in single pass arc welds. Metall Mater Trans B 27:481–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02914913

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Metallic Materials Characterization Laboratory (LCAM), Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Rua Augusto Corrêa, 1 - Guamá, Belém, PA, 66075-110, Brazil

    P. D. C. Assunção & E. M. Braga

  2. Centre for Advanced Materials Joining (CAMJ), University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G5, Canada

    R. A. Ribeiro & A. P. Gerlich

  3. Liburdi Automation Inc. - Liburdi GAPCO, 400 ON-6, Dundas, ON, L9H 7K4, Canada

    E. B. F. Dos Santos

Authors
  1. P. D. C. Assunção
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. A. Ribeiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. B. F. Dos Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. M. Braga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. P. Gerlich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. A. Ribeiro.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Assunção, P.D.C., Ribeiro, R.A., Dos Santos, E.B.F. et al. Comparing CW-GMAW in direct current electrode positive (DCEP) and direct current electrode negative (DCEN). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104, 2899–2910 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04175-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04175-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation