Skip to main content
Log in

Force prediction in micro-grinding maraging steel 3J33b considering the crystallographic orientation and phase transformation

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In micro-grinding, the effects of crystallography on grinding force become significant since the depth of cut is of the same order as the grain size. In this research, the Taylor factor model for multi-phase materials is proposed based on the previously reported Taylor factor model for monocrystalline material. Based on this model, the flow stress model is developed, which takes both the effect of CO on the athermal stress and the stress induced by the phase transformation into account. Based on the flow stress model, the predictive model of chip formation force is proposed by adapting parallel-sided shear zone theory. The rubbing force is modeled by applying Waldorf’s worn tool theory. Furthermore, the plowing force is predicted based on previously reported model by the authors. Subsequently, a comprehensive model of the micro-grinding force is proposed by considering mechanical-thermal loading, the effects of crystallography, and phase transformation. Finally, the model is validated by conducting an orthogonal-designed experiment with the result proving that the prediction of the model is capable to capture the magnitude and trend of the experimental data. Moreover, the proposed analysis are compared with the predictions of two other previously reported models with the result, indicating that the model that considers the effect of CO and the phase transformation improves the accuracy of the micro-grinding force.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A, B, C, m, n :

Johnson-Cook parameters

HV:

Vickers hardness

HB:

Brignell hardness

α 1 :

Material constant

b 1 :

Burger vector

ρ 1 :

Density of dislocation

ρ :

Material density

K :

Thermal conductivity

T 0, T m, T w :

Workpiece, ambient, and melting temperature

C p :

Specific heat

v :

Poisson’s ratio

V :

Wheel speed

V w :

Workpiece speed or feedrate

a p :

The depth of cut

l c :

The total contact length of the primary heat source

l ob :

Contact length of the plowing plane

l ab :

Contact length of the shear plane

l oc :

Contact length of the rubbing plane

α cr :

The critical rake angle

φ k :

Local shear angle

α k :

Local rake angle

β k :

Local friction angle

τ s :

Shear strength in tangential direction

t :

Undeformed chip thickness

f :

Phase transformation fraction

D :

Grit diameter

C s :

Static cutting edge density

C d :

Dynamic cutting edge density

Φ1i, Φ2i :

Angle between slip plane and cutting plane in grain

γ1, γi :

Correction angles

E :

Workpiece elasticity modulus

K w, K t :

Workpiece and wheel elasticity

F tg, rubbing :

Tangential force of single grit

F ng, rubbing :

Normal force of single grit

F t, plowing :

Tangential plowing force of the whole wheel

F n, plowing :

Normal plowing force of the whole wheel

F t, shear :

Tangential shear force of the whole wheel

F n, shear :

Normal shear force of the whole wheel

F t, rubbing :

Tangential force of the whole wheel

F n, rubbing :

Normal force of the whole wheel

k, m, t :

Functions of temperature, stain, and strain rate

φ 1, ∅, φ 2 :

Bunge Euler angles

ΔT wk :

Workpiece temperature rise

w :

Cutting width

θ :

The angle shear force and normal force on the shear plane

r :

The cutting edge radius

t cr :

The minimum undeformed chip thickness

k :

A chip formation point on the grit edge

M F, M B :

Taylor factor of single FCC and BCC crystal

M :

Taylor factor of muti-phase material

A s, k s :

Parameters of wheel topography

\( {\dot{\varepsilon}}_0 \) :

Material constant

ε cp :

Plastic strain

\( \dot{\varepsilon} \) :

Plastic strain rate

ε tp :

Strain induced by phase transformation

ψ :

The cone angle of grit

α :

Thermal diffusivity

σ :

Total flow stress

Ω1i, Ω2i :

Angle between slip direction and cutting direction in grain

References

  1. Yao Y, Zhu HT, Huang CZ, Zhang DC, Wang J, Zhang P, Yao P (2016) Surface roughness and topography analysis in precision milling of 3j33 maraging steel. Mater Sci Forum 874:497–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang YC, Zhai YS, Wang HX, Bai QS, Zhao Y (2007) Surface roughness prediction based on cutting parameters and nose radius in precision turning. Key Eng Mater 329:539–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guo Z, Sha W, Li D (2004) Quantification of phase transformation kinetics of 18 wt.% Ni c250 maraging steel. Mater Sci Eng A 373(1–2):10–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu X, Li L, He N, Zhao M, Zhan Z (2015) Investigation on the influence of material microstructure on cutting force and bur formation in the micro cutting of copper. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79(1–4):321–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Venkatachalam S, Fergani O, Li XP, Yang JG, Chiang KN, Liang SY (2015) Microstructure effects on cutting forces and flow stress in ultra-precision machining of polycrystalline brittle materials. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 137(2):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu F, Fang F, Zhu Y, Zhang X (2017) Study on crystallographic orientation effect on surface generation of aluminum in nano-cutting. Nanoscale Res Lett 12(1):289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hall EO (1951) The deformation and ageing of mild steel: III. Discussion of results. Proc Phys Soc Sec B 64(9):747–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Petch NJ (1953) The cleavage strength of polycrystals. J Iron Steel Inst 174(1):25–28

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hughes DA, Hansen N (2000) Microstructure and strength of nickel at large strains. Acta Mater 48(11):2985–3004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Park HW, Liang SY (2008) Force modeling of micro-grinding incorporating crystallographic effects. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 48(15):1658–1667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tabei SA (2015) Modeling of microstructural evolutions in machining of dual phase alloys. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lin Y-C, Shiu Y-C (2016) Effect of crystallographic orientation on single crystal copper nanogrooving behaviors by MD method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(9–12):3207–3215

    Google Scholar 

  13. Demir E (2008) Taylor-based model for micro-machining of single crystal FCC materials including frictional effects—application to micro-milling process. Int J Mach Tool Manu 48(14):1592–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao M, Ji X, Li B, Liang SY (2016) Investigation on the influence of material crystallographic orientation on grinding force in the micro-grinding of single-crystal copper with single grit. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(9–12):3347–3355

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao M, Ji X, Liang SY (2018) Influence of aa7075 crystallographic orientation on micro-grinding force. Proc Ins Mech Eng, Part B: J Eng Manuf: J Engin Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405418803706

  16. Justinger H, Hirt G (2009) Estimation of grain size and grain orientation influence in microforming processes by Taylor factor considerations. J Mater Proc Technol 209(4):2111–2121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fischer FD, Schlogl SM (1995) The influence of material anisotropy on transformation-induced plasticity in steel subject to martensitic-transformation. Mech Mater 21(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li BZ, Ding ZS, Xiao J, Liang SY (2016) Maraging steel 3j33 phase transformation during micro-grinding. Mater Lett 164:217–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Magee CL (1966) Transformation Kinetics, Microplasticity and Aging of Martensite in Fe-31 Ni, Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh, PA

  20. Greenwood GW, Johnson RH (1965) The deformation of metals under small stresses during phase transformation. Math Phys Sci 283(1394):403–422

  21. Yanagisawa Y, Hosoya T, Kishi Y, Sasaki K (2017) Effect of ferrite phase fraction on bainite transformation plasticity in double transformation. In: Effect of ferrite phase fraction on bainite transformation plasticity in double transformation

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Vasileiou AN, Smith MC, Balakrishnan J, Francis JA, Hamelin CJ (2017) The impact of transformation plasticity on the electron beam welding of thick-section ferritic steel components. Nucl Eng Des 323:309–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Simsir C (2017) Transformation induced plasticity (TRIP) of SAE 52100 steel during martensitic and bainitic transformations. Hittite J Sci Eng 4(2):125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Avrami M (1940) Kinetics of phase change. II. Transformation-time relations for random distribution of nuclei. J Chem Phys 8(2):212–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Koistinen DP, Marburger RE (1959) A general equation prescribing the extent of the austenite-martensite transformation in pure iron-carbon alloys and plain carbon steels. Acta Metall 7(1):59–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ding Z, Li B, Liang SY (2016) Material phase transformation at high heating rate during grinding. Mach Sci Technol 20(2):290–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ding Z, Li B, Shao Y, Liang SY (2015) Phase transition at high heating rate and strain rate during maraging steel c250 grinding. Mater Manuf Proc 31(13):1763–1769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ding Z, Li B, Liang SY (2015) Maraging steel phase transformation in high strain rate grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(1–4):711–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ding ZS, Li BZ, Zou P, Liang SY (2014) Material phase transformation during grinding. Adv Mater Res 1052:503–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu C, Pang J, Li B, Liang SY (2019) High-speed grinding of hip-sic ceramics on transformation of microscopic features. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-03226-4

  31. Ding ZS (2016) Research on surface integrity and process optimal criterion of micro-grinding. Donghua University, Shanghai, China

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nabarro FRN, Basinski ZS, Holt DB (1964) The plasticity of pure single crystals. Adv Phys 13(50):193–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bunge H (1982) Texture analysis in material science—mathematical methods. Buttersworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  34. Oxley PLB (1989) The mechanics of machining: an analytical approach to assessing machinability. Halsted Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lichun L, Jizai F, Peklenik J (1980) A study of grinding force mathematical model. CIRP Ann 29(1):245–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shao Y (2015) Predictive modeling of residual stress in mql grinding and surface characteristcs in grinding of ceramics. Geogia institute of technology, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  37. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Proceeding of the Seventh International Symposium on Ballistics, The Hague, pp 541–547

  38. Leacock AG, Howe C, Brown D, Lademo OG, Deering A (2013) Evolution of mechanical properties in a 7075 Al-alloy subject to natural ageing. Mater Des 49:160–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Blanckenhagen B v, Gumbsch P, Arzt E (2001) Dislocation sources in discrete dislocation simulations of thin-film plasticity and the Hall-Petch relation. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 9(3):157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Avrami M (1939) Kinetics of phase change. I. General theory. J Chem Phys 7(12):1103–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tayon W, Crooks R, Domack M, Wagner J, Elmustafa AA (2008) EBSD study of delamination fracture in Al–Li alloy 2090. Exp Mech 50(1):135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hecker RL (2003) Part surface roughness modeling and process optimal control of cylindrical grinding. Geogia Institute of Technology, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wu CJ, Li BZ, Yang JG, Liang SY (2016) Prediction of grinding force for brittle materials considering co-existing of ductility and brittleness. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(5–8):1967–1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Younis MA, Alawi H (1984) Probabilistic analysis of the surface grinding process. Trans Can Soc Mech Eng 8(4):208–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Park HW, Park YB, Liang SY (2011) Multi-procedure design optimization and analysis of mesoscale machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56(1–4):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51705073).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xia Ji.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, M., Ji, X. & Liang, S.Y. Force prediction in micro-grinding maraging steel 3J33b considering the crystallographic orientation and phase transformation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103, 2821–2836 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03724-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03724-z

Keywords

Navigation