Skip to main content
Log in

Identification and compensation of position-dependent geometric errors of rotary axes on five-axis machine tools by using a touch-trigger probe and three spheres

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the machining accuracy of five-axis machine tools, it must be emphasized that not only the PIGEs but also the PDGEs of rotary axes influence the machining accuracy. However, until now there is no any commercial measurement system available for identifying the PDGEs in the rotary axes of five-axis machine tools. As a result, this study proposes a robust, efficient, and automatic measurement method to identify and compensate the position-dependent geometric errors (PDGEs) of rotary axes on five-axis machine tools. The proposed measurement method has established an on-machine measurement for the PDGEs of rotary axes by using a touch-trigger probe and three spheres installed on the spindle as well as the tilting rotary table, respectively. For each rotary axis, only a single measuring pattern is implemented to measure the PDGEs with a single setup, which delineates the advantages of efficient and automated identifying procedures in each periodical measurement. By implementing the proposed measurement method, 12 PDGEs can be numerically identified based on the measurement algorithm, which is built through a kinematic error model as well as a least square method. Finally, the proposed measurement method is experimentally conducted on a commercial five-axis machine tool. Moreover, after consequently performing the proposed measurement method, the PDGEs of the rotary axes were quantitatively compensated by the commercial controller to validate its feasibility. The experimental results have clearly delineated that the linear errors and angular errors are reduced from at most 37.81 μm and 10.23 mdeg to 0.9 μm and 0.26 mdeg, respectively. Consequently, the experimental results have demonstrated that the proposed measurement method is efficient and precise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xiang S, Yang J (2014) Using a double ball bar to measure 10 position-dependent geometric errors for rotary axes on five-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75:559–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen YL, Shimizu Y, Cai Y, Wang S, Ito S, Ju BF, Gao W (2015) Self-evaluation of the cutting edge contour of a microdiamond tool with a force sensor integrated fast tool servo on an ultra-precision lathe. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:2257–2267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu CS, Li YA (2018) Evaluation of grinding wheel loading phenomena by using acoustic emission signals. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99:1109–1117

  4. Li Y, Wei W, Su D, Zhao W, Zhang J, Wu W (2018) Thermal error modeling of spindle based on the principal component analysis considering temperature-changing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99:1341–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wiessner M, Blaser P, Böhl S, Mayr J, Knapp W, Wegener K (2018) Thermal test piece for 5-axis machine tools. Precis Eng J Int Soc Precis Eng Nanotechnol 52:407–417

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wu SK, Tsai MS, Lin MT, Huang HW (2018) Development of novel tool center point velocity planning algorithm for five axis machine tool. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 19(8):1187–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blaser P, Pavliček F, Mori K, Mayr J, Weikert S, Wegener K (2017) Adaptive learning control for thermal error compensation of 5-axis machine tools. J Manuf Syst 44:302–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Olarra A, Axinte D, Kortaberria G (2018) Geometrical calibration and uncertainty estimation methodology for a novel self-propelled miniature robotic machine tool. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 49:204–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Szipka K, Laspas T, Archenti A (2018) Measurement and analysis of machine tool errors under quasi-staticand loaded conditions. Precis Eng J Int Soc Precis Eng Nanotechnol 51:59–67

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sun G, He G, Zhang D, Sang Y, Zhang X, Ding B (2018) Effects of geometrical errors of guideways on the repeatability of positioning of linear axes of machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98:2319–2333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zha J, Xue F, Chen Y (2017) Straightness error modeling and compensation for gantry type open hydrostatic guideways in grinding machine. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 112:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen YT, Lin WC, Liu CS (2017) Design and experimental verification of novel six-degree-of freedom geometric error measurement system for linear stage. Opt Lasers Eng 92:94–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu W, Li X, Jia Z, Li H, Ma X, Yan H, Ma J (2018) Binocular-vision-based error detection system and identification method for PIGEs of rotary axis in five-axis machine tool. Precis Eng J Int Soc Precis Eng Nanotechnol 51:208–222

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee KI, Yang SH (2013) Robust measurement method and uncertainty analysis for position-independent geometric errors of a rotary axis using a double ball-bar. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 14(2):231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ISO 230-7 (2015) Test code for machine tools-part 7: geometric accuracy of axes of rotation, ISO

  16. ISO 10791-1 (2015) Test conditions for machining centres –part1: geometric tests for machines with horizontal spindle (horizontal z-axis), ISO

  17. ISO 10791-6 (2014) Test conditions for machining centres –part6: accuracy of speeds and interpolations, ISO

  18. Flynn JM, Shokrani A, Vichare P, Dhokia V, Newman ST (2018) A new methodology for identifying location errors in 5-axis machine tools using a single ballbar set-up. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99:53–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiang S, Yang J, Zhang Y (2014) Using a double ball bar to identify position-independent geometric errors on the rotary axes of five-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70:2071–2082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Weikert S (2004) R-test, a new device for accuracy measurements on five axis machine tools. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 53(1):429–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ibaraki S, Knapp W (2012) Indirect measurement of volumetric accuracy for three-axis and five-axis machine tools: a review. Int J Autom Technol 6(2):110–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bi Q, Huang N, Sun C, Wang Y, Zhu L, Ding H (2015) Identification and compensation of geometric errors of rotary axes on five-axis machine by on-machine measurement. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 89:182–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ibaraki S, Iritani T, Matsushita T (2012) Calibration of location errors of rotary axes on five-axis machine tools by on-the-machine measurement using a touch-trigger probe. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 58:44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ibaraki S, Iritani T, Matsushita T (2013) Error map construction for rotary axes on five-axis machine tools by on-the-machine measurement using a touch-trigger probe. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 68:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ibaraki S, Oyama C, Otsubo H (2011) Construction of an error map of rotary axes on a five-axis machining center by static R-test. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:190–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zargarbashi SHH, Mayer JRR (2006) Assessment of machine tool trunnion axis motion error, using magnetic double ball bar. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:1823–1834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee KI, Lee DM, Yang SH (2012) Parametric modeling and estimation of geometric errors for a rotary axis using double ball-bar. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62:741–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu S, Ding G, Qin S, Lei J, Zhuang L, Yan K (2012) Integrated geometric error modeling, identification and compensation of CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 52(1):24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang Y, Yang J, Zhang K (2013) Geometric error measurement and compensation for the rotary table of five-axis machine tool with double ballbar. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65:275–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Peng W, Xia H, Chen X, Lin Z, Wang Z, Li H (2018) Position-dependent geometric errors measurement and identification for rotary axis of multi-axis machine tools based on optimization method using double ball bar. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99:2295–2307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen YT, More P, Liu CS (2018) Identification and verification of location errors of rotary axes on five-axis machine tools by using a touch-trigger probe and a sphere. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. Online 1–15

  32. Tsutsumi M, Saito A (2004) Identification of angular and positional deviations inherent to 5-axis machining centers with a tilting-rotary table by simultaneous four-axis control movements. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1333–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided to this study by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under Grant Nos. MOST 106-2218-E-194-011, 106-3114-8-194-001, 106-2628-E-006-010-MY3, and 107-2218-E-194 -002.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chien-Sheng Liu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, YT., More, P., Liu, CS. et al. Identification and compensation of position-dependent geometric errors of rotary axes on five-axis machine tools by using a touch-trigger probe and three spheres. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102, 3077–3089 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03413-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03413-x

Keywords

Navigation