Skip to main content
Log in

An ontology-based product design framework for manufacturability verification and knowledge reuse

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To achieve efficient development of high-quality product, manufacturing constraints must be fully taken into account at the early design stage. However, designers lack in-depth knowledge of manufacturing and production. Many time-consuming iterations of design changes are required between designers and manufacturing engineers. In order to minimize this knowledge gap, this paper presents an ontology-based product design framework for manufacturability verification and knowledge reuse to support the sharing and reuse of design and manufacturing knowledge. It aims at providing advices and feedback of restraints of manufacturing processes to the designers during the design process. The proposed framework consists of three major layers which include a foundation layer, a domain layer, and an instance layer. We use the Web Ontology Language (OWL), a standard of ontology representation language, to formalize the foundation layer. It contains the core product model and the standard ISO 10303 AP224 application protocol. The domain layer comprises extensional concepts and relationships for design and manufacturing integration and a rule base for manufacturability verification, which is represented in Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL). In the instance layer, an inference engine is developed based on ontology and rule inference. It provides recommendations of manufacturability. Two case studies are provided as application examples to demonstrate the effectiveness of the framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Imran M, Young B (2015) The application of common logic based formal ontologies to assembly knowledge sharing. J Intell Manuf 26(1):139–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hong H, Yin Y, Chen X (2016) Ontological modelling of knowledge management for human–machine integrated design of ultra-precision grinding machine. Enterp Inf Syst 10(9):970–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anjum N, Harding JA, Young RIM, Case K (2012) Manufacturability verification through feature-based ontological product models. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 226(6):1086–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramos L (2015) Semantic Web for manufacturing, trends and open issues: toward a state of the art. Comput Ind Eng 90:444–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gruber TR (1993) A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl Acquis 5(2):199–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang D, Hu D, Xu Y (2010) A framework for ontology-based product design knowledge management. In Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), 2010 Seventh International Conference on (Vol. 4, pp. 1751–1755). IEEE

  7. Qin Y, Lu W, Qi Q, Li T, Huang M, Scott PJ, Jiang X (2016) Explicitly representing the semantics of composite positional tolerance for patterns of holes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1–17

  8. Chen X, Chen CH, Leong KF, Jiang X (2013) An ontology learning system for customer needs representation in product development. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(1–4):441–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. He B, Song W, Wang Y (2013) A feature-based approach towards an integrated product model in intelligent design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(1–4):15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. W3C (2004) OWL web ontology language semantics and abstract syntax. 2004

  11. Maedche A, Staab S (2001) Ontology learning for the semantic web. IEEE Intell Syst 16(2):72–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Horrocks I, Patel PF-S, Boley H, Tabetm S, Grosof B, Dean M (2004) SWRL: a semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML

  13. Baader F (2003) The description logic handbook: theory, implementation and applications. Cambridge university press

  14. Sánchez-Macián A, Pastor E, de López Vergara J, López D (2007) Extending SWRL to enhance mathematical support. In: Web reasoning and rule systems. p. 358–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Negri E, Fumagalli L, Garetti M, Tanca L (2016) Requirements and languages for the semantic representation of manufacturing systems. Comput Ind 81:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu D, Rosen DW, Wang L, Schaefer D (2015) Cloud-based design and manufacturing: a new paradigm in digital manufacturing and design innovation. Comput Aided Des 59:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pahl G, Beitz W, Wallace K, Council D (1984) Engineering design (Vol. 984). London: Design Council

  18. Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (1995) Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sutherland IE (1964) Sketchpad a man-machine graphical communication system. Transactions of the Society for Computer Simulation 2(5):R–3

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li WD, Lu WF, Fuh JY, Wong YS (2005) Collaborative computer-aided design—research and development status. Comput Aided Des 37(9):931–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Qiang L, Zhang YF, Nee AYC (2001) A distributive and collaborative concurrent product design system through the WWW/Internet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17(5):315–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Piller F, Vossen A, Ihl C (2011) From social media to social product development: the impact of social media on co-creation of innovation

  23. Zhan P, Jayaram U, Kim OJ, Zhu L (2010) Knowledge representation and ontology mapping methods for product data in engineering applications. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 10(2):699–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Štorga M, Andreasen MM, Marjanović D (2010) The design ontology: foundation for the design knowledge exchange and management. J Eng Des 21(4):427–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Afacan Y, Demirkan H (2011) An ontology-based universal design knowledge support system. Knowl-Based Syst 24(4):530–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chungoora N, Young RI, Gunendran G, Palmer C, Usman Z, Anjum NA, Cutting-Decelle A, Harding JA, Case K (2013) A model-driven ontology approach for manufacturing system interoperability and knowledge sharing. Comput Ind 64(4):392–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang Y, Peng G, Liu W (2010) Research on ontology-based integration of product knowledge for collaborative manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49(9–12):1209–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gorti SR, Gupta A, Kim GJ, Sriram RD, Wong A (1998) An object-oriented representation for product and design processes. Comput Aided Des 30(7):489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chandrasegaran SK, Ramani K, Sriram RD, Horváth I, Bernard A, Harik RF, Gao W (2013) The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems. Comput Aided Des 45(2):204–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Khan AA, Hussein HM, Nasr ESA, Al-Ahmari A (2015) Computer-aided process planning in prismatic shape die components based on Standard for the Exchange of Product model data. Adv Mech Eng, 7(11), 1687814015619828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. ISO 10303-224 (2001) Industrial automation systems and integration—product data representation and exchange—part 224: application protocol: mechanical product definition for process planning using machining features

  32. McGuinness DL, Van Harmelen F (2004) OWL web ontology language overview. W3C recommendation, 10(10), 2004

  33. Friedmanhill EJ (1997) Jess, the java expert system shell. Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports

  34. Umar MM, Mehmood A, Song H (2015) A survey on state-of-the-art knowledge-based system development and issues. Smart CR 5(6):498–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51405089) and the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2015B010131008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhi Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Z., Zhou, X., Wang, W.M. et al. An ontology-based product design framework for manufacturability verification and knowledge reuse. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99, 2121–2135 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2099-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2099-2

Keywords

Navigation