Skip to main content
Log in

A global-to-local registration and error evaluation method of blade profile lines based on parameter priority

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Presently, the quality evaluation of long blade profile is still mainly based on the specific cross section, focusing on the twist, position, and profile errors. However, the common registration methods of blade profiles only focus on profile error and ignore other important parameters, which may results in misjudgment of qualified blade or increasing the scrap rate. So, a new global-to-local registration and error evaluation method for a long blade is proposed in this paper. Based on the parameter priority, the registration of the blade is completed from global fine registrations to local fine registrations. The best-fit algorithm is used for global fine registration to screen out the qualified blades firstly. Then, the unqualified results are further optimized by the coordinate alternation method in the local fine registration to guarantee the evaluation result qualified as far as possible. The experimental results show that the proposed method reduces the misjudgment effectively by keeping the more important parameters in the tolerance range. And it is beneficial and practical to guide blade finish machining or repairing because the difficult finish machining or repairable machining parameters are priority to guarantee in the allowable error range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chady T, Sikora R, Lopato P, Psuj G, Szymanik B, Balasubramaniam K, Rajagopal P (2016) Wind turbine blades inspection techniques. Organ 5:16

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anoshkin AN, Osokin VM, Tretyakov AA, Potrakhov NN, Bessonov VB (2017) Application of operational radiographic inspection method for flaw detection of blade straightener from polymeric composite materials. J Phys: Conf Ser. IOP publishing 808(1):012003

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dervilis N, Maguire A E, Papatheou E, Worden K (2017) Wind turbine health monitoring: current and future trends with an active learning twist. Rotating machinery, hybrid test methods, vibro-acoustics & laser vibrometry, volume 8. Springer, Cham 119–129

  4. Smith L, Karim H, Etemad S (2006) The gas turbine handbook. Bruxelles Médical 35(35):1401–1408

    Google Scholar 

  5. Khameneifar F, Feng H Y (2016) Extracting sectional contours from scanned point clouds via adaptive surface projection. Int J Prod Res 1–15

  6. Wen X, Zhao Y, Wang D, Zhu X, Xue X (2013) Accurate evaluation of free-form surface profile error based on quasi particle swarm optimization algorithm and surface subdivision. Chin J Mech Eng 26(2):406–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hsu TH, Lai JY, Ueng WD (2006) On the development of airfoil section inspection and analysis technique. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30(1–2):129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sijie Y, Yunfei Z, Fangyu P, Xide L (2004) Research on the localisation of the workpieces with large sculptured surfaces in NC machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23(5–6):429–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grant D, Bethel J, Crawford M (2012) Point-to-plane registration of terrestrial laser scans. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 72:16–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dai J, Chen Z, Ye X (2007) The application of ICP algorithm in point cloud alignment. J Image Graphics 12:517–521

    Google Scholar 

  11. Du S, Zheng N, Ying S, Liu J (2010) Affine iterative closest point algorithm for point set registration. Pattern Recogn Lett 31(9):791–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Besl P J, McKay N D (1992) Method for registration of 3-D shapes. Robotics-DL tentative. International Society for Optics and Photonics 586–606

  13. Hsu TH, Lai JY, Ueng WD, Hwang JZ (2005) An iterative coordinate setup algorithm for airfoil blades inspection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26(7–8):797–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ji S, Ren Y, Ji Z, Liu X, Hong G (2017) An improved method for registration of point cloud. Optik-Int J Light and Electron Opt 140:451–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang B, Fang J, Liu P (2016) A registration method for 2D blade profile. International Symposium on Optoelectronic Technology and Application 1015528-1015528-10

  16. Kwok TH, Tang K (2016) Improvements to the iterative closest point algorithm for shape registration in manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng 138(1):011014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu J, Chen Z, Jiang Z (2016) An approach for machining distortion measurements and evaluation of thin-walled blades with small datum. Chin J Aeronaut 29(6):1806–1814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jing SK, Cheng YY, Zhang DH, Yang HC (2010) Tolerance zone constrained alignment method for turbine blade model. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 16(4):883–886

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li W, Xie H, Zhang G, Yan SJ, Yin ZP (2016) 3-D shape matching of a blade surface in robotic grinding applications. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics 21(5):2294–2306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khameneifar F, Feng HY (2016) A new methodology for evaluating position and orientation errors of airfoil sections. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(5–8):1013–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shulong HU, Zhang D, Zhang Y (2013) Inspection method of blade shape based on digitized template with design tolerance constraints. Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica 34(10):2411–2418

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lin X, Yan G, Wu G, Fan NJ, Jiang B, Gao XF (2013) CMM measuring data processing algorithms for blades about the contour measurement. Yi Qi Yi Biao Xue Bao/Chinese J Sci Instrum 34(11):2442–2450

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rong Y, Xu J, Sun Y (2014) A surface reconstruction strategy based on deformable template for repairing damaged turbine blades. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G: J Aerospace Eng 228(12):2358–2370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vassiliadis V S, Conejeros R (2008) Cyclic coordinate method. Encyclopedia of Optimization Springer US 595–596

  25. Wright SJ (2015) Coordinate descent algorithms. Math Program 151(1):3–34

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Ma W, Kruth JP (1998) NURBS curve and surface fitting for reverse engineering. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 14(12):918–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Brujic D, Ainsworth I, Ristic M (2011) Fast and accurate NURBS fitting for reverse engineering. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54(5–8):691–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61377104 and No. 61405156).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Junhui Huang or Yingchun Yuan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, J., Yuan, Y., Wang, Z. et al. A global-to-local registration and error evaluation method of blade profile lines based on parameter priority. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94, 3829–3839 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1125-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1125-0

Keywords

Navigation