Abstract
Increasing competition and high accuracy make it necessary to optimize and evaluate the outcome of manufacturing processes. In tool grinding, models for the tool path and tool setting are of particular interest. In this article, to establish a valid general grinding model, an improved method for tool setting error compensation is proposed. We consequently developed models of tool path and tool setting, and verified the models by simulations. Lastly, the model is demonstrated through testing of a concave aspheric surface. The experiment results show that the introduced models are valid for grinding in aspherical mirror, since they are solely based on the geometry and process parameters, and hence are applicable for manufacturing process optimization.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lee ES, Baek SY (2007) A study on optimum grinding factors for aspheric convex surface micro-lens using design of experiments[J]. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(3):509–520
Li B, Zhao HY, Xi JP, Ren DX (2015) On-machine self-calibration method for compensation during precision fabrication of 900-mm-diameter zerodur aspheric mirror[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(9–12):1855–1863
Xi JP, Zhao HY, Li B, Ren DX (2015) Profile error compensation in cross-grinding mode for large-diameter aspheric mirrors[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(9):1–9
Lin XH, Wang ZZ, Guo YB, Peng YF, Hu CL (2014) Research on the error analysis and compensation for the precision grinding of large aspheric mirror surface[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(1–4):233–239
Rahman MS, Saleh T, Lim HS, Son SM, Rahman M (2008) Development of an on-machine profile measurement system in ELID grinding for machining aspheric surface with software compensation[J]. Int J Mach Tool Manu 48(7):887–895
Hwang Y, Kuriyagawa T, Lee SK (2006) Wheel curve generation error of aspheric microgrinding in parallel grinding method[J]. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(15):1929–1933
Chen B, Guo B, Zhao Q (2015) An investigation into parallel and cross grinding of aspheric surface on monocrystal silicon[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(5–8):737–746
Chen F, Yin S, Ohmori H, Yu J (2013) Form error compensation in single-point inclined axis nanogrinding for small aspheric insert[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65(1–4):433–441
Payrebrune KMD, Kröger M (2016) Reduced models of grinding wheel topography and material removal to simulate dynamical aspects in grinding[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(1–4):1–11
Cao YL, Guan JY, Li B, Chen XL, Gan CB (2013) Modeling and simulation of grinding surface topography considering wheel vibration[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(5–8):937–945
Küng A, Meli F, Nicolet A, Thalmann R (2014) Application of a virtual coordinate measuring machine for measurement uncertainty estimation of aspherical lens parameters[J]. Meas Sci Technol 25(9):094011
Wei X, Li B, Chen L, Sun L, Xin MT, Liu BC (2017) Position error correction of large-aperture aspherical in-position measurement[J]. Rev Sci Instrum 88(6):065101
PLC R. Xl-80+/− 0.5 ppm uncertainty breakdown[R]. Renishaw PLC, 2013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, X., Li, B., Chen, L. et al. Tool setting error compensation in large aspherical mirror grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94, 4093–4103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1094-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1094-3