Skip to main content
Log in

Extracting the turning volume and features for a mill/turn part with multiple extreme faces

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a geometric reasoning approach for extracting the maximum turnable state (MTS) and its turning features for a mill/turn part which has multiple extreme faces. Here, an extreme face refers to a vertical planar face whose adjacent faces are all located on the same side of the plane. It is more difficult to construct the MTS for such a part because the positions of its cross-sectional planes do not change monotonically on the principal axis, and the concave regions formed by its profile need special treatments in its feature recognition. The proposed method addresses the issue of multiple extreme faces with a graph decomposition strategy for the attributed adjacency graph of CAD models, and handles the feature recognition problem by matching the feature shape descriptors with the descriptors of local element combinations out of the delta volume mesh. The method not only produces all the turning features for a part but also generates the feature precedence graph as well from reasoning on their adjacency relations. At the end of the paper, an example is presented to demonstrate the method’s effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leo Kumar SP, Jerald J, Kumanan S (2014) An intelligent process planning system for micro turn-mill parts. Int J Prod Res 52(20):6052–6075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Givehchi M, Haghighi A, Wang L (2015) Generic machining process sequencing through a revised enriched machining feature concept. J Manuf Syst 37:564–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li RKW (1988) A part-feature recognition system for rotational parts. Int J Prod Res 26(9):1451–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Babic B, Nesic N, Miljkovic Z (2008) A review of automated feature recognition with rule-based pattern recognition. Comput Ind 59(4):321–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Verma AK, Rajotia S (2010) A review of machining feature recognition methodologies. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 23(4):353–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zheng Y, Taib JM, Tap MM (2012) Decomposition of interacting machining features based on the reasoning on the design features. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58(1):359–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ranjan R, Kumar N, Pandey RK, Tiwari MK (2005) Automatic recognition of machining features from a solid model using the 2D feature pattern. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26(7):861–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Madurai SS, Lin L (1992) Rule-based automatic part feature extraction and recognition from CAD data. Comput Ind Eng 22(1):49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Y, Luo X, Zhang B, Zhang S (2017) Semantic approach to the automatic recognition of machining features. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:417–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Joshi S, Chang TC (1988) Graph-based heuristics for recognition of machined features from a 3D solid model. Comput Aided Des 20(2):58–66

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Marefat M, Kashyap RL (1990) Geometric reasoning for recognition of three-dimensional object features. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12(10):949–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gao S, Shah JJ (1998) Automatic recognition of interacting machining features based on minimal condition subgraph. Comput Aided Des 30(9):727–739

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Litter G, Clark DER, Corney JR, Tuttle JR (1998) Delta-volume decomposition for multi-sided components. Comput Aided Des 30(9):695–705

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Woo Y, Sakurai H (2002) Recognition of maximal features by volume decomposition. Comput Aided Des 34(3):195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yip-Hoi D, Dutta D, Huang Z (2003) A customizable machining feature extraction methodology for turned components. J Manuf Syst 22(2):82–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang Z, Xie B, Ma L, Wei X (2006) Feature conversion based on decomposition and combination of swept volumes. Comput Aided Des 38(8):857–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jaider O, El Mesbahi A, Rechia A (2014) Manufacturing computer aided process planning for rotational parts. Part 2: a new approach for optimizing multiple interpretations of interacting features based on manufacturing rules and metal removal principals. Int J Innov Appl Stud 8(1):307–319

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sormaz DN, Khoshnevis B (2003) Generation of alternative process plans in integrated manufacturing systems. J Intell Manuf 14(6):509–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Woo TC (1982) Feature extraction by volume decomposition. Conference on CAD/CAM technology in mechanical engineering, pp 76–94

  20. Kim YS (1992) Recognition of form features using convex decomposition. Comput Aided Des 24(9):461–476

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Kataraki PS, Mansor MSA (2017) Auto-recognition and generation of material removal volume for regular form surface and its volumetric features using volume decomposition method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(5):1479–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yip-Hoi D, Dutta D (1995) Data extraction from geometric models for process planning for parallel machines. J Manuf Syst 14(5):307–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Waiyagan K, Bohez ELJ (2009) Intelligent feature based process planning for five-axis mill-turn parts. Comput Ind 60(5):296–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yip-Hoi D, Dutta D (1997) Finding the maximum turnable state for mill/turn parts. Comput Aided Des 29(12):879–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tseng YJ, Joshi SB (1998) Recognition of interacting rotational and prismatic machining features from 3-D mill-turn parts. Int J Prod Res 36(11):3147–3165

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Watkins M, Rahmani K, D’Souza R (2007) Finding the maximal turning state of an arbitrary mesh. ASME 2007 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 63–67

  27. Li S, Shah JJ (2005) Recognition of interacting turning features for mill/turn parts. ASME 2005 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 543–553

  28. Li S, Shah JJ (2007) Recognition of user-defined turning features for mill/turn parts. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 7(3):225–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fu W, Eftekharian AA, Campbell MI, Kurtoglu T (2014) Automatic reasoning for defining lathe operations for mill-turn parts: a tolerance based approach. J Mech Des 136(12):121701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kayacan MC, Filiz IH, Sönmez AI, Baykasoğlu A, Dereli T (1996) OPPS-ROT: an optimised process planning system for rotational parts. Comput Ind 32(2):181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengdong Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, L., Huang, Z., Liu, W. et al. Extracting the turning volume and features for a mill/turn part with multiple extreme faces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94, 257–280 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0862-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0862-4

Keywords

Navigation