Skip to main content
Log in

On the tube hydroforming process using rectangular, trapezoidal, and trapezoid-sectional dies: modeling and experiments

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is generally known that the contact between tube and die, in the case of tube hydroforming process, leads to the appearance of friction effects. In this context, there are many different models for representing friction and many different tests to evaluate it. In the present paper, the pin-on-disk test has been used and the theoretical model of Orban-2007 has been chosen and developed to evaluate friction coefficient. The main goal is to prove the capacity of theoretical model to present the friction conditions in comparison with the pin-on-disk test. From the Orban model, values of 0.05 and 0.25 of friction coefficient have been found under lubricated and dry tests, respectively. On the other hand, by the classical pin-on-disk test, other values were experimentally obtained as friction coefficient at the copper/steel interface. In the case of pure expansion hydroforming, based on an internal pressure loading only, a “corner filling” test has been run for tube hydroforming. Both dry and lubricated contacts have been considered. Various configurations and shapes have been studied such as the rectangular, trapezoidal, and trapezoid-sectional dies. Finite element simulations with 3D shell and 3D solid models have been performed with different values of friction coefficients. From the main results, it was found that the critical thinning occurs in the transition zone for the square and rectangular section die and in the sharp angle for the trapezoidal and trapezoid-sectional die. The comparison between numerical data and experimental results shows a good agreement. Moreover, the thickness distribution along the cross section is relatively consistent with those measured for the 3D shell model; however, the 3D solid models do not provide a realistic representation of the thickness distribution in the shaped tube. Finally, the results obtained from the theoretical model were more efficient than the results obtained from the pin-on-disk test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fiorentino A, Ceretti E, Attanasio A, Braga D, Giardini C (2009) Experimental study of lubrication influence in the production of hydroformed T-joint tubes. Key Eng Mater 410:15–24 Trans Tech Publications

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ngaile G, Jaeger S, Altan T (2004) Lubrication in tube hydroforming (THF): part I. Lubrication mechanisms and development of model tests to evaluate lubricants and die coatings in the transition and expansion zones. J Mater Process Technol 146(1):108–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ngaile G, Jaeger S, Altan T (2004) Lubrication in tube hydroforming (THF): part II. Performance evaluation of lubricants using LDH test and pear-shaped tube expansion test. J Mater Process Technol 146(1):116–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kridli GT, Bao L, Mallick PK, Tian Y (2003) Investigation of thickness variation and corner filling in tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 133(3):287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu G, Yuan S, Teng B (2006) Analysis of thinning at the transition corner in tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 177(1):688–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Orban H, Hu SJ (2007) Analytical modeling of wall thinning during corner filling in structural tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 194(1):7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu X, Li S, Zhang W, Lin Z (2009) Analysis of thickness distribution of square-sectional hydroformed parts. J Mater Process Technol 209(1):158–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Imaninejad M, Subhash G, Loukus A (2004) Influence of end-conditions during tube hydroforming of aluminum extrusions. Int J Mech Sci 46(8):1195–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zribi T, Khalfallah A, Belhadj Salah H (2008) Analyse de l’effet des paramètres matériaux sur l’hydroformage des tubes. Congrès Tunisien de Mécanique, Hammamet, Tunisia 17th to 19th March

  10. Cui XL, Wang XS, Yuan SJ (2014) Deformation analysis of double-sided tube hydroforming in square-section die. J Mater Process Technol 214(7):1341–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Daly D, Duroux P, Rachik M, Roelandt JM, Wilsius J (2007) Modelling of the post-localization behaviour in tube hydroforming of low carbon steels. J Mater Process Technol 182(1):248–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kyriakides S (2011) Hydroforming of anisotropic aluminum tubes: part I experiments. Int J Mech Sci 53(2):75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Korkolis YP, Kyriakides S (2011) Hydroforming of anisotropic aluminum tubes: part II analysis. Int J Mech Sci 53(2):83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yuan SJ, Han C, Wang XS (2006) Hydroforming of automotive structural components with rectangular sections. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(11):1201–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xiao XT, Liao YJ, Sun YS, Zhang ZR, Kerdeyev YP, Neperish RI (2007) Study on varying curvature push-bending technique of rectangular section tube. J Mater Process Technol 187:476–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang WW, Wang XS, Cui XL, Yuan SJ (2015) Analysis of corner filling behavior during tube hydro-forming of rectangular section based on Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman ductile damage model. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 229(9):1566–1574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yuan S, Song P, Wang X (2011) Analysis of transition corner formation in hydroforming of rectangular-section tube. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 225(5):773–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu X, Zhang W, Li S, Lin Z (2009) Study of tube hydroforming in a trapezoid-sectional die. Thin-Walled Struct 47(11):1397–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li S, Xu X, Zhang W, Lin Z (2009) Study on the crushing and hydroforming processes of tubes in a trapezoid-sectional die. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43(1–2):67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guermazi N, Elleuch K, Ayedi HF, Fridrici V, Kapsa P (2009) Tribological behaviour of pipe coating in dry sliding contact with steel. Mater Des 30(8):3094–3104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fiorentino A, Ceretti E, Giardini C (2013) The THF compression test for friction estimation: study on the influence of the tube material. Key Eng Mater 549:423–428 Trans Tech Publications

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang DW, Cui MC, Cao M, Ben NY, Zhao SD (2017) Determination of friction conditions in cold-rolling process of shaft part by using incremental ring compression test. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1-9. doi:10.1007/s00170-017-0087-6

  23. Ma JP, Yang LF (2017) Measurement methods of friction coefficient for plastic deformation of metals under high strain rate. Mater Sci Forum 878:127–131 Trans Tech Publications

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu CL, Yang LF, He YL (2014) On the measurement of friction coefficient at the curved surface in metal forming. Appl Mech Mater 446:1134–1137 Trans Tech Publications

    Google Scholar 

  25. Plancak M, Vollertsen F, Woitschig J (2005) Analysis, finite element simulation and experimental investigation of friction in tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 170(1):220–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aydemir A, De Vree JHP, Brekelmans WAM, Geers MGD, Sillekens WH, Werkhoven RJ (2005) An adaptive simulation approach designed for tube hydroforming processes. J Mater Process Technol 159(3):303–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Abdelkefi A, Guermazi N, Boudeau N, Malécot P, Haddar N (2016) Effect of the lubrication between the tube and the die on the corner filling when hydroforming of different cross-sectional shapes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(1–4):1169–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Abdelkefi A, Malécot P, Boudeau N, Guermazi N, Haddar N (2017) Evaluation of the friction coefficient in tube hydroforming with the “corner filling test” in a square section die. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(5-8), 2265-2273

  29. Abdelkefi A, Boudeau N, Malécot P, Michel G, Guermazi N (2014) On the friction effect on the characteristics of hydroformed tube in a square section die: analytical, numerical and experimental approaches. Key Eng Mater 639:83-90

  30. Abdelkefi A, Boudeau N, Malecot P, Guermazi N, Michel G (2015) Study of localized thinning of copper tube hydroforming in square section die: effect of friction conditions. Key Eng Mater 651:65–70 Trans Tech Publications

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noamen Guermazi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdelkefi, A., Malécot, P., Boudeau, N. et al. On the tube hydroforming process using rectangular, trapezoidal, and trapezoid-sectional dies: modeling and experiments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93, 1725–1735 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0621-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0621-6

Keywords

Navigation