Skip to main content
Log in

Two-component injection moulding of thermoset rubber in combination with thermoplastics by thermally separated mould cavities and rapid heat cycling

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two-component injection moulding is a manufacturing process used to combine polymers with different properties within a single product. The process is often used to combine thermoplastics of different colours or to combine thermoplastic elastomers with thermoplastics to create hard and soft areas. In this study, a two-component injection moulding process is proposed for combining thermoplastics with thermoset rubbers. This poses technological challenges since rubbers require a heated mould (160–200 C) for the rubber to vulcanise whereas thermoplastics need a relatively cold mould (20–100 C) for the polymer to solidify. The mould used for this study is equipped with thermally separated mould cavities and allows to reverse the injection sequence of the two materials. It was found that the optimal sequence is to inject the thermoplastic first, followed by rubber, and that the mould temperature at the interface during the vulcanisation of the rubber is a critical process parameter. Too low mould temperatures at the interface result in long vulcanisation times and poor adhesion, whereas higher temperatures at the interface both decrease the vulcanisation time and increase the adhesion strength. However, when the temperature is too high, the adhesion strength decreases again due to gas bubbles at the interface released during the vulcanisation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Osswald T A, Turng L S, Gramann P (2008) Injection molding handbook. Hanser, Munich, p 65, 431–435

  2. Schneegans D, Gattringer R (2005) Mehrkomponenten-Spritzguss. Kautsch Gummi Kunstst 58:16–21

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kamal M R, Isayev A, Liu S -J (2009) Injection molding technology and fundamentals. Munich, pp 55–60

  4. Ciesielski A (1999) An introduction to rubber technology. Rapra Technology Limited, Shawbury, pp 63–75, 140

    Google Scholar 

  5. Linday JA. (2012) Practical guide to rubber injection moulding. Smithers Rapra, London, p 14, 47–54, 69

  6. Schneegans D, Gattringer R, Bauer R (2007) Neue Kunststoff-Kautschuk-Verbunde mit grossem Innovationspotenzial. Gummi Fasern Kunststoffe 60:494–499

    Google Scholar 

  7. Islam A, Hansen H N, Bondo M (2010) Experimental investigation of the factors influencing the polymer–polymer bond strength during two-component injection moulding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meister S, Drummer D (2016) Micro assembly injection moulding with variothermal mould tempering. Microsystem Technology

  9. Guilong W, Guoqun Z, Huiping L, Yanjin G (2010) Analysis of thermal cycling efficiency and optimal design of heating/cooling systems for rapid heat cycle injection molding process. Mater Des 31:3426–3441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guilong W, Guoqun Z, Huiping L, Yanjin G (2011) Research on optimization design of the heating/cooling channels for rapid heat cycle molding based on response surface methodology and constrained particle swarm optimization. Expert Syst Appl 38:6705–6719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zaimova D, Bayraktar E, Dishovsky N (2011) State of cure evaluation by different experimental methods in thick rubber parts. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 44:161–167

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown R (2011) Physical testing of rubber. Springer, New York, pp 63–94

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pazur RJ, Walker FJ (2009) State of cure measurements in peroxide and sulfur cured EPDM. Rubber World 204:25–35

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arrillaga A, Zaldua AM, Farid AS (2010) Evaluation of injection-molding simulation tools to model the cure kinetics of rubbers. J Appl Polym Sci 123:1437–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khimi SR, Pickering KL (2014) A new method to predict optimum cure time of rubber compound using dynamic mechanical analysis. J Appl Polym Sci 131:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jabbari E, Peppas NA (1994) Polymer-polymer interdiffusion and adhesion. J Macromol Sci 34:205–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thust T (2014) Rezeptur- und Prozesseinflüsse auf das Haftverhalten beim Mehrkomponentenspritzgiessen von Thermoplast-Elastomer-Verbundbauteilen am Beispiel PA6.6 - HNBR. Dissertation. Deutschen Institut für Kautschuktechnologie

  18. Brauer M, Hupfer B, Nagel J, Lehmann D (2002) Chemical modification of polyurethane for two-component injection molding. Polym Eng Sci 42:859–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pompe G, Brauer M, Schweikle, Nagel J, Hupfer B, Lehmann D (2006) Influence of the temperature profile in the interface on the bond strength of polyamide–polyurethane two-component tensile bars. J Appl Polym Sci 100:4297–4305

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

G. Bex acknowledges Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO) for funding his PhD grant Strategic Basic Research. The authors also acknowledge the company Hercorub NV for providing the uncured rubber material.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gert-Jan Bex.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bex, GJ., Desplentere, F., De Keyzer, J. et al. Two-component injection moulding of thermoset rubber in combination with thermoplastics by thermally separated mould cavities and rapid heat cycling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92, 2599–2607 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0341-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0341-y

Keywords

Navigation