Skip to main content
Log in

Assembly deformation prediction of riveted panels by using equivalent mechanical model of riveting process

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The assembly deformation of skin panels can be introduced by the riveting process. However, it is computationally costly and time consuming to conduct the numerical simulation of the riveting process for each rivet in skin panels. Here, an equivalent mechanical model of the riveting process is established to improve the computational efficiency of the deformation prediction for the riveted structure. The axial pressure beneath the rivet driven head is solved in the equivalent mechanical model. The assembly deformation of riveted panels is found to be influenced by the axial pressure significantly, challenging the traditional analogy of riveting to the radial expansion process. In addition, the dependence of the radial pressure upon the radial displacement of the rivet hole is established. The characteristic of non-uniform distribution of the radial pressure along the thickness direction is taken into consideration. The deformations of riveted structures are predicted considering various heights of the rivet driven head and different materials of the panel. The effectiveness of the proposed model is evaluated by comparing the deformation results of the numerical simulation and those of the experimental measurement. This investigation can help to predict the deformation of large riveted structures and improve the awareness of the effect of axial pressure on the assembly deformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neugebauer R, Rössinger M, Wahl M, Schulz F, Eckert A, Schützle W (2011) Predicting dimensional accuracy of mechanically joined car body assemblies. Key Eng Mater 473:973–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eckert A, Israel M, Neugebauer R, Rössinger M, Wahl M, Schulz F (2012) Local–global approach using experimental and/or simulated data to predict distortion caused by mechanical joining technologies. Prod Eng Res Devel 7(2-3):339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cai W, Wang PC, Yang W (2005) Assembly dimensional prediction for self-piercing riveted aluminum panels. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 45(6):695–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lambiase F (2013) Influence of process parameters in mechanical clinching with extensible dies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(9-12):2123–2131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aman F, Cheraghi SH, Krishnan KK, Lankarani H (2013) Study of the impact of riveting sequence, rivet pitch, and gap between sheets on the quality of riveted lap joints using finite element method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(1-4):545–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng H, Li Y, Zhang KF, Mu WQ, Liu BF (2011) Variation modeling of aeronautical thin-walled structures with multi-state riveting. J Manuf Syst 30(2):101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Negroni DY, Trabasso LG (2011) A replicated two-level total factorial analysis: deformation in aluminum alloy skins caused by riveting processes. Prod Manage Dev 9(1):59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saadat M, Cretin L, Sim R, Najafi F (2007) Prediction of geometrical variations in Airbus wingbox assembly. Assembly Autom 27(4):324–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li G, Shi G, Bellinger NC (2011) Stress in triple-row riveted lap joints under the influence of specific factors. J Aircraft 48(2):527–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin J, Jin S, Zheng C, Li ZM, Liu YH (2014) Compliant assembly variation analysis of aeronautical panels using unified substructures with consideration of identical parts. Comput Aid Des 57:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang H (2014) Riveting sequence study of horizontal stabilizer assembly using finite-element analysis and riveting equivalent unit. J Aerosp Eng 27(6):04014040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rans DC, Straznicky PV, Alderliesten R (2007) Riveting process induced residual stresses around solid rivets in mechanical joints. J Aircraft 44(1):323–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Viganò F, Manes A, Giglio M (2011) Investigation on the fatigue life of an Al 8090 helicopter riveted T-joint. J Aircraft 48(1):315–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li G, Shi G, Bellinger NC (2006) Studies of residual stress in single-row countersunk riveted lap joints. J Aircraft 43(3):592–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rans DC (2007) The role of rivet in stallation on the fatigue performance of riveted lap joints. Ph.D. Dissertation, Carleton Univ, Ottawa, Canada

  16. Shishkin SS (2010) Computation of the contact load in a rivet bond. J Mach Manuf Reliab 39(1):43–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang JB (1977) Prediction of Fatigue Crack Growth at Cold-worked Fastener Holes. J Aircraft 14(9):903–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ball DL (1995) Elastic-plastic stress analysis of cold expanded fastener holes. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Stru 18(1):47–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saadat M, Cretin L, Sim R, Najafi F (2009) Deformation analysis of large aerospace components during assembly. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41(1-2):145–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheraghi SH (2008) Effect of variations in the riveting process on the quality of riveted joints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39(11-12):1144–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Manes A, Giglio M, Viganò F (2011) Effect of riveting process parameters on the local stress field of a T-joint. Int J Mech Sci 53(12):1039–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dowling NE (2007) Mechanical behavior of materials, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rans DC, Straznicky PV, Alderliesten R (2007) Effects of rivet installation on residual stresses and secondary bending stresses in a riveted lap joint. Proc 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct, Struc Dynam. Mater Conf 13:189–203

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yu HQ, Chen JD (1999) The principle of metal plastic forming. China Machine Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  25. Derijck J, Homan J, Schijve J, Benedictus R (2007) The driven rivet head dimensions as an indication of the fatigue performance of aircraft lap joints. Int J Fatigue 29(12):2208–2218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang R, Huang WB, Huang ZP (1992) Introduction to plasticity. Peking University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xu BY, Liu YS (1995) Application of elastic and plastic mechanics. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  28. Liang K (2013) Interference Calculation and Process Validation of Aircraft Panel Riveted Structure. Master Dissertation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China

  29. Deng X, Hutchinson JW (1998) The clamping stress in a cold-driven rivet. Int J Mech Sci 40(7):683–694

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Yuan L (2010) Aviation manufacturing engineering handbook:Aircraft assembly, 2nd edn. Aviation Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  31. Li YH, Cao ZQ, Zhang QL, Feng DG (2013) Study on the effect of riveting quality with different angles of the forming cup of riveting die. Acta Aeronaut et Astronaut Sinica 33(2):426–433

    Google Scholar 

  32. Park JH, Atluri SN (1993) Fatigue growth of multiple-cracks near a row of fastener-holes in a fuselage lap-joint. Int J Computation Mech 13:189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haidong Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, B., Yu, H. & Lai, X. Assembly deformation prediction of riveted panels by using equivalent mechanical model of riveting process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92, 1955–1966 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0262-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0262-9

Keywords

Navigation