Skip to main content
Log in

Vibration suppression of a tool in a lathe machine through contract-based design

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Machine design is one of the most important tasks in the present scenario. Presently, machine design is done taking into account all the variables and operating conditions. The process is time consuming, error prone, and inefficient design methodology. Due to lack of optimization of the performance of individual components, the performance of the machine as a whole deteriorates. This paper aims at demonstrating the versatility of contract-based design methodology to design machines and overcome some of the drawbacks of the traditional designing process. The process variables involved in such a complex process are best modeled as fuzzy variables as they take non-discrete values. These fuzzy variables are analyzed using contract-based design. An illustration of lathe machine is used to enhance the machining capability by suppressing vibrations using a fuzzy controller and contract-based design. This leads to accurate machining with better tolerances and surface finish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abuthakeer SS, Mohhnaram PV, Mohan Kumar G (2011) Prediction and control of cutting tool vibration in CNC lathe with ANOVA and ANN. Int J Lean Think 2(1):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adolfsson J, Ng A, Olofsgard P, Moore P, Pu J, Wong C (2002) Design and simulation of component-based manufacturing machine systems. Mechatronics 12(9–10):1239–1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Badouel E, Benveniste A, Caillaud B, Passerone R (2006) Heterogeneous rich component definition, mathematical semantics. SPEEDS deliverable D2.1b/Sem, Annex Of Deliverable D2.1b

  4. Baldwin CY, Clark KB (1997) Managing in an age of modularity. Harv Bus Rev 75:84.93

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design rules: the power of modularity. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  6. Benvenuti L, Ferrari A, Mangeruca L, Mazzi E, Passerone R, Sofronis C (2008) A contract based formalism for the specification of heterogeneous systems.In: Proceedings of specification, verification and design languages, 2008. FDL 2008

  7. Benvenuti L, Ferrari A, Mazzi E, Sangiovanni Vincentelli AL (2008) Contract based design for computation and verification of a closed-loop hybrid system. HSCC ’08. In: Proceedings of the 11th international workshop on hybrid systems: computation and control, p 58–71

  8. Fixson SK (2003) The multiple faces of modularity—a literature analysis of a product concept for assembled hardware products. Technical Report, Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan

  9. Gershenson JK, Prasad GJ, Allamneni S (1999) Modular product design: a lifecycle view. J Integr Des Process Sci 3:13–26

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hajek P (2006) Fuzzy Sets Syst 157:604–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hassan MF, Mailah M, Junid R, Alang NA (2010) Vibration suppression of a handheld tool using intelligent active force control (AFC). In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, 2

  12. Haugen F (2010) The good gain method for PI(D) controller tuning. www.techteach.no

  13. Sako M (2003) Modularity and outsourcing. In: Prencipe A, Davies A, Hobday, M (eds)

  14. Sanchez R, Mahoney JT (1996) Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strateg Manag J 17:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Skogestad S (2003) Simple analytical rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning. J Process Control 13:291–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ulrich K (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res Policy 24:419–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vernon J. Fuzzy Logic Systems. www.control-systems-principles.co.uk

  18. Zhehe Y, Deqing M, Zichen C (2011) Chatter suppression by parametric excitation: model and experiments. J Sound Vib 330(13):2995–3005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ziegler JG, Nichols NB (1942) Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Trans ASME 64:759–768

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. K. Tiwari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Awasthi, A., Singh, P., Pujari, P. et al. Vibration suppression of a tool in a lathe machine through contract-based design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86, 1763–1773 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8308-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8308-3

Keywords

Navigation