Skip to main content
Log in

The milling simulation and experimental research on high volume fraction of SiCp/Al

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A multi-phase two-dimension finite element model has been developed by using ABAQUS/Explicit in order to describe the effect of reinforcement particles’ existence in SiCp/Al6063 composites on the machining process. It is used to simulate the high-speed milling process of high volume fraction SiCp/Al6063 composites. As comparison, the same machining process of matrix Al6063 is simulated with the HEM (homogenous equivalent material) model. These two models are verified with quasi-orthogonal slot milling tests. It is assumed that the variation of predicted milling forces with the feed rate is consistent with the experiments and the prediction error of the peak value of F y can be controlled within 10 %. Moreover, multi-phase model is helpful for discovering the miscellaneous interactions of matrix, particle and tool and the induced complicated stress distribution in the cutting area, for further obtaining an in-depth understanding of removal mechanism of SiCp/Al6063 composites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lin JT, Bhattacharyya D, Lane C (1995) Machinability of a silicon carbide reinforced aluminium metal matrix composite. Wear 181:883–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Z, Chen TK, Lloyd DJ (1993) Stress distribution in particulate-reinforced metal-matrix composites subjected to external load. Metall Trans A 24(1):197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. El-Gallab M, Sklad M (1998) Machining of Al/SiC particulate metal matrix composites: part II: workpiece surface integrity. J Mater Process Technol 83(1):277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Monaghan J, Brazil D (1997) Modeling the sub-surface damage associated with the machining of a particle reinforced MMC. Comput Mater Sci 9(1):99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Monaghan J, Brazil D (1998) Modelling the flow processes of a particle reinforced metal matrix composite during machining. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 29(1):87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu Y, Kishawy HA (2005) Influence of alumina particles on the mechanics of machining metal matrix composites. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(4):389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pramanik A, Zhang LC, Arsecularatne JA (2007) An FEM investigation into the behavior of metal matrix composites: tool–particle interaction during orthogonal cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(10):1497–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dandekar CR, Shin YC (2009) Multi-step 3-D finite element modeling of subsurface damage in machining particulate reinforced metal matrix composites. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 40(8):1231–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou L, Huang ST, Wang D, Yu XL (2011) Finite element and experimental studies of the cutting process of SiCp/Al composites with PCD tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52(5–8):619–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fathipour M, Zoghipour P, Tarighi J, Yousefi R (2012) Investigation of reinforced SiC particles percentage on machining force of metal matrix composite. Mod Appl Sci 6(8):9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shui XJ, Zhang YD, Wu Q (2014) Mesoscopic model for SiCP/Al composites and simulation on the cutting process. Appl Mech Mater 487:189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Umer U, Ashfaq M, Qudeiri JA, Hussein HMA (2015) Modeling machining of particle-reinforced aluminum-based metal matrix composites using cohesive zone elements. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78:1171–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Strenkowski JS, Carroll JT (1985) A finite element model of orthogonal metal cutting. J Eng Ind 107(4):349–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin ZC, Lin SY (1992) A coupled finite element model of thermo-elastic–plastic large deformation for orthogonal cutting. J Eng Mater Technol 114(2):218–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Komvopoulos K, Erpenbeck SA (1991) Finite element modeling of orthogonal metal cutting. J Eng Ind 113(3):253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang L (1999) On the separation criteria in the simulation of orthogonal metal cutting using the finite element method. J Mater Process Technol 89:273–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pramanik A, Zhang LC, Arsecularatne JA (2006) Prediction of cutting forces in machining of metal matrix composites. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(14):1795–1803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lloyd DJ (1991) Aspects of fracture in particulate reinforced metal matrix composites. Acta Metall Mater 39(1):59–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Spowart JE, Miracle DB (2003) The influence of reinforcement morphology on the tensile response of 6061/SiC/25p discontinuously reinforced aluminum. Mater Sci Eng A 357(1):111–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang H (2001) Plastic deformation and chip formation mechanisms during machining of copper, aluminum and an aluminum matrix composite. Dissertation, North Carolina State University

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lijing Xie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, B., Xie, L., Chen, X. et al. The milling simulation and experimental research on high volume fraction of SiCp/Al. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82, 809–816 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7399-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7399-1

Keywords

Navigation