Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigation into effect of particle impact damping (PID) on surface topography in boring operation

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a novel method, based on the particle impact damping (PID), for the attenuation of regenerative vibration in boring operation. A specially designed boring bar having a cavity near machining-end for partial filling of spherical particles has been developed. Characteristics of boring bar with and without PID have been found from impact and shaker tests. After identifying appropriate particle size and filling volume, experiments are conducted to evaluate the performance in actual boring operations. Additional boring experiments are also conducted to confirm the performance by changing particle size and filling volumes. The collision of the particles in PID is found to attenuate regenerative vibration by the energy dissipation and thus effectively enhances stability of the boring operation. Analysis of effect of PID on surface topography in terms of chatter marks, surface roughness, and roundness of bored holes shows that the proposed method results in improvement of bore quality when compared with a boring bar without PID. It is also established that radial vibration of the boring bar has a significant influence on the surface topography obtained in boring operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Åkesson H, Smirnova T, Håkansson L (2009) Analysis of dynamic properties of boring bars concerning different clamping conditions. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(8):2629–2647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altintas Y, Weck M (2004) Chatter stability of metal cutting and grinding. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 53(2):619–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bai X-M, Keer LM, Wang QJ, Snurr RQ (2009) Investigation of particle damping mechanism via particle dynamics simulations. Granul Matter 11(6):417–429

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bayly PV, Halley JE, Mann BP, Davies MA (2003) Stability of interrupted cutting by temporal finite element analysis. J Manuf Sci Eng 125(2):220–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chien AY (1982) Approximate harmonic models for rpundness profiles with equivalent enery mean square values. Wear 77:247–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Compeán FI, Olvera D, Campa FJ, Lopez de Lacalle LN, Elias-Zuniga AD (2012) Characterization and stability analysis of a multivariable milling tool by the enhanced multistage homotopy perturbation method. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 57:27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Damir MNH (1979) Approximate harmonic models for rpundness profiles. Wear 57(2):217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ema S, Marui E (2000) Suppression of chatter vibration of boring tools using impact dampers. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(8):1141–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Friend RD, Kinra VK (2000) Particle impact damping. J Sound Vib 233(1):93–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hahn RS (1951) Design of Lanchester damper for elimination of metal-cutting chatter. Trans ASME 73:331–335

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hahn RS (1970) Boring bar with means to reduce vibrations, US 3499350 A, Mar 1970

  12. Inasaki I, Karpuschewski B, Lee HS (2001) Grinding chatter—origin and suppression. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 50(2):515–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Insperger T, Mann BP, Stepan G, Bayly PV (2003) Stability of up-milling and down-milling, part 1: alternative analytical methods. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(1):25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koenigsberger F, Tlusty J (1970) Machine tool structures, vol 1. Pergamon Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li CJ, Ulsoy AG, Endres WJ (2006) The effect of spindle speed variation on chatter suppression in rotating-tool machining. Mater Sci Forum 505–507:859–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin SC, Hu MR (1992) Low vibration control system in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 32(5):629–640

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Mao K, Wang MY, Xu Z, Chen T (2004) Simulation and characterization of particle damping in transient vibrations. J Vib Acoust 126(2):202–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marhadi KS, Kinra VK (2005) Particle impact damping: effect of mass ratio, material, and shape. J Sound Vib 283(1–2):433–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Merdol SD, Altintas Y (2008) Virtual simulation and optimization of milling operations—part I: process simulation. J Manuf Sci Eng 130:051004-1–051004-12

    Google Scholar 

  20. Monnin J, Kuster F, Wegener K (2014) Optimal control for chatter mitigation in milling—part 1: modeling and control design. Control Eng Pract 24:156–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Monnin J, Kuster F, Wegener K (2014) Optimal control for chatter mitigation in milling—part 2: experimental validation. control eng pract 24:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moradi H, Bakhtiari-Nejad F, Movahhedy MR (2008) Tuneable vibration absorber design to suppress vibrations: an application in boring manufacturing process. J Sound Vib 318(1–2):93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moradi H, Movahhedy MR, Vossoughi GR (2009) Robust control strategy for suppression of regenerative chatter in turning. J Manuf Process 11(2):55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Otto A, Radons G (2013) Application of spindle speed variation for chatter suppression in turning. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 6(2):102–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Panossian HV (1992) Structural damping enhancement via non-obstructive particle damping technique. J Vib Acoust 114(1):101–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Patel BR, Mann BP, Young KA (2008) Uncharted islands of chatter instability in milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(1):124–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Quintana G, Ciurana J (2011) Chatter in machining processes: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(5):363–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rahman M, Naranayan V, Venkatesh VC (1986) Optimization of error-of-roundness in turning processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 35(1):377–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rivin EI, Kang H (1989) Improvement of machining conditions for slender parts by tuned dynamic stiffness of tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 29(3):361–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rivin EI, Kang HL, Kops L (1989) Improving dynamic performance of cantilever boring bars. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 38(1):377–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith GT (2002) Industrial metrology—surfaces and roundness. Springer, Britain

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Sweeney G, Tobias SA (1969) Survey of basic machine tool chatter research. Int J Machine Tool Design Res 9(3):217–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Takasu S, Masuda M, Nishiguchi T, Kobayashi A (1985) Influence of study vibration with small amplitude upon surface roughness in diamond machining. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 34(1):463–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tarng YS, Kao JY, Lee EC (2000) Chatter suppression in turning operations with a tuned vibration absorber. J Mater Process Technol 105(1–2):55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tewani SG, Rouch KE, Walcott BL (1995) A study of cutting process stability of a boring bar with active dynamic absorber. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35(1):91–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tobias SA, Fishwick W (1958) A Theory of Regenerative Chatter. The Engineer- London

  37. Tunç LT, Budak E (2012) Effect of cutting conditions and tool geometry on process damping in machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 57:10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vela-Martínez L, Jáuregui-Correa JC, Rubio-Cerda E, Herrera-Ruiz G, Lozano–Guzman A (2008) Analysis of compliance between the cutting tool and the workpiece on the stability of a turning process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(9):1054–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wan M, Zhang W-H, Dang J-W, Yang Y (2010) A unified stability prediction method for milling process with multiple delays. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(1):29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang M, Fei R (1999) Chatter suppression based on nonlinear vibration characteristic of electrorheological fluids. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39(12):1925–1934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Whitehouse D (2002) Surfaces and their measurement. Hermes Penton Science, London

    Google Scholar 

  42. Xu Z, Wang MY, Chen T (2005) Particle damping for passive vibration suppression: numerical modelling and experimental investigation. J Sound Vib 279(3–5):1097–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India

    C. V. Biju & M. S. Shunmugam

Authors
  1. C. V. Biju
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. S. Shunmugam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Shunmugam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Biju, C.V., Shunmugam, M.S. Investigation into effect of particle impact damping (PID) on surface topography in boring operation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75, 1219–1231 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6201-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6201-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation