Skip to main content
Log in

Generation of rotation matrix for assembly models with arbitrary angle constraints

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assembly modeling, which is established by geometric constraints, plays an important role in product design. However, most constraint solving methods are only applicable for the cases in which the orientation constraints between base and mating component are either fit or against. This paper presents a modified geometric constraint solving method. It allows arbitrary angles for the orientation constraints and implements them into rotation matrix that determines the relative orientation of a mating component to a base component. The method transforms the constraints to a set of nonlinear equations firstly, and then solves it algebraically instead of using numerical methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sodhi R, Turner JU (1994) Towards modeling of assemblies for product design. Comput Aided Des 26(2):85–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dadalau A, Verl A (2011) Bottem-up component oriented FE-modelling of machine tools. 4th International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production (CARV2011), Montreal, Canada

  3. Holland W, Bronsvoof WF (2000) Assembly features in modeling and planning. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 16(4):277–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim J, Kim K, Lee J, Choi K (2000) Solving 3D geometric constraints for assembly modeling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 16(11):843–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haynes LS, Morris GH (1988) A formal approach to specifying assembly operations. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 28(3):281–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nnaji B, Liu H (1990) Feature reasoning for automatic robotic assembly and machining in polyhedral representation. Int J Prod Res 28(3):517–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Turner JU, Subramaniam S, Gupta S (1992) Constraint representation and reduction in assembly modeling and analysis. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 8(6):741–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oliver JH, Harangozo MJ (1992) Inference of link positions for planar closed-loop mechanisms. Comput Aided Des 24(1):18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim J, Kim K, Lee J, Jeong J (2005) Generation of assembly models from kinematic constraints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26(1–2):131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tomas F, Torras C (1988) A group theoretic approach to the computation of symbolic part relations. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 4(6):622–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Anantha R, Kramer GA, Crawford RH (1996) Assembly modeling by geometric constraint satisfaction. Comput Aided Des 28(9):707–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rocheleau D, Lee K (1987) System for interactive assembly modeling. Comput Aided Des 19(2):65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deneux D (1999) Introduction to assembly features: an illustrated synthesis methodology. J Intell Manuf 10(1):29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zheng Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Z., Dadalau, A. & Verl, A. Generation of rotation matrix for assembly models with arbitrary angle constraints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74, 563–568 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5907-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5907-3

Keywords

Navigation