Skip to main content
Log in

Proud of, but too close: the negative externalities of a new sports stadium in an urban residential area

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sports facilities have been found to generate positive externalities over negative ones, so empirical studies report residential property prices increase near these facilities. This study investigates the effect of a new baseball stadium on housing values using a case which is deemed to induce negative externalities overwhelmingly due to the case-specific characteristics. Employing a difference-in-differences (DID) approach on data reflecting over 17,000 apartment transactions, this study finds a significant price depreciation within 2 km from a new stadium by up to approximately 7% after its opening. The spatial variation in price changes presents a clear distance decaying pattern, implying that the price effects are closely associated with negative externalities such as light pollution, noise, and traffic congestion. All of which would obviously fade away being further from the origin, the stadium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source VWORLD (https://map.vworld.kr)

Fig. 2

Source VWORLD (https://map.vworld.kr)

Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A 2 km threshold in Ahlfeldt and Maennig (2009), a 2.5 mile threshold in Coates and Humphreys (2006), a 3 mile threshold in Kavetsos (2012)and Tu (2005), and a 5 km threshold in Ahlfeldt and Kavetsos (2014).

References

  • Ahlfeldt GM, Kavetsos G (2012) Outlook, progress and challenges of stadium evaluation. In: International handbook on the economics of mega sporting events. Edward Elgar Publishing

  • Ahlfeldt GM, Kavetsos G (2014) Form or function?: the effect of new sports stadia on property prices. London J Roy Stat Soc 177(1):169–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlfeldt GM, Maennig W (2009) Arenas, arena architecture and the impact on location desirability: the case of “Olympic Arenas” in Prenzlauer Berg. Berlin Urban Stud 46:1343–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlfeldt GM, Maennig W (2010) Impact of sports arenas on land values: evidence from Berlin. Ann Reg Sci 44:205–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates D, Humphreys BR (2006) Proximity benefits and voting on stadium and arena subsidies. J Urban Econ 59:285–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehring CA, Depken CA, Ward MR (2007) The impact of stadium announcements on residential property values: evidence from a natural experiment in dallas-fort worth contemporary. Econ Pol 25:627–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng X, Humphreys B (2012) The impact of professional sports facilities on housing values: evidence from census block group data. City Cult Soc 3:189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng X, Humphreys B (2018) Assessing the economic impact of sports facilities on residential property values: a spatial hedonic approach. J Sports Econ 19:188–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons S, Machin S (2005) Valuing rail access using transport innovations. J Urban Econ 57:148–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groothuis PA, Johnson BK, Whitehead JC (2004) Public funding of professional sports stadiums: public choice or civic pride? Eastern Econ J 30:515–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Humphreys BR (2014) New sports facilities and residential housing markets. J Reg Sci 54:629–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys BR, Nowak A (2017) Professional sports facilities, teams and property values: evidence from NBA team departures. Reg Sci Urban Econ 66:39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavetsos G (2012) The impact of the London Olympics announcement on property prices. Urban Stud 49:1453–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope DG, Pope JC (2015) When walmart comes to town: Always low housing prices? Always? J Urban Econ 87:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu CC (2005) How does a new sports stadium affect housing values? the case of fedex field. Land Econ 81:379–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbalist A, Long JG (2006) Facility finance: measurement, trends, and analysis. Int J Sport Finance 1:201–211

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present research was supported by the research fund of Dankook university in 2020 and has no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongwoo Hyun.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hyun, D. Proud of, but too close: the negative externalities of a new sports stadium in an urban residential area. Ann Reg Sci 68, 615–633 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-021-01095-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-021-01095-6

Navigation