Abstract
Purpose
To utilise a large cross-sectional database to analyse the effects of time duration between diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) on concomitant procedures performed and subsequent surgery within 2 years.
Methods
An analysis from 2015 to 2018 was performed using the Mariner PearlDiver Patient Records Database. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), and International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes identified patients with a diagnosis of ACL tear who underwent subsequent ACLR. Patients were stratified in biweekly and bimonthly increments based on the time duration between initial diagnosis of ACL tear and surgical treatment. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare categorical variables, and trend analysis was performed with Cochran–Armitage independence testing.
Results
Of 11,867 patients who underwent ACLR, 76.1% underwent surgery within 2 months of injury diagnosis. Patients aged 10–19 were most likely to undergo surgery within 2 months of injury diagnosis (83.5%, P < 0.0001). As duration from injury diagnosis to ACLR increased from < 2 months to > 6 months, rates of concomitant meniscectomy increased from 9.1% to 20.5% (P < 0.0001). The overall 2-year subsequent surgery rate was 5.3%. The incidence of revision ACLR was highest for patients who underwent surgery > 6 months after diagnosis (P < 0.0001), whilst the incidence of ipsilateral lysis of adhesions and manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) was highest for patients who underwent surgery < 2 months after diagnosis (P < 0.0001). ACLR at 6–8 weeks after diagnosis demonstrated the lowest risk for concomitant procedures as well as 2-year subsequent surgery.
Conclusion
The majority of patients undergo ACL reconstruction within 2 months of initial ACL tear diagnosis. Delayed surgery greater than 6 months after the diagnosis of an ACL rupture leads to increased need for concomitant meniscectomy as well as higher risk for revision ACLR within 2 years, but immediate surgery may increase risk for knee arthrofibrosis.
Level of evidence
IV
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.
References
Allen CR, Wong EK, Livesay GA, Sakane M, Fu FH, Woo SL (2000) Importance of the medial meniscus in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. J Orthop Res 18:109–115
Anderson AF, Anderson CN (2015) Correlation of meniscal and articular cartilage injuries in children and adolescents with timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 43:275–281
Bedi A, Chen T, Santner TJ, El-Amin S, Kelly NH, Warren RF et al (2013) Changes in dynamic medial tibiofemoral contact mechanics and kinematics after injury of the anterior cruciate ligament: a cadaveric model. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 227:1027–1037
Cameron M, Buchgraber A, Passler H, Vogt M, Thonar E, Fu F et al (1997) The natural history of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Changes in synovial fluid cytokine and keratan sulfate concentrations. Am J Sports Med 25:751–754
Cevallos N, Soriano KKJ, Lansdown DA, Ma CB, Feeley BT, Zhang AL (2021) Contemporary practice patterns for the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament tears in the United States. Orthop J Sports Med 9:23259671211040892
Cristiani R, Janarv PM, Engström B, Edman G, Forssblad M, Stålman A (2021) Delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction increases the risk of abnormal prereconstruction laxity, cartilage, and medial meniscus injuries. Arthroscopy 37:1214–1220
Cristiani R, Rönnblad E, Engström B, Forssblad M, Stålman A (2018) Medial meniscus resection increases and medial meniscus repair preserves anterior knee laxity: a cohort study of 4497 patients with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 46:357–362
Deabate L, Previtali D, Grassi A, Filardo G, Candrian C, Delcogliano M (2020) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction within 3 weeks does not increase stiffness and complications compared with delayed reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med 48:1263–1272
Ding DY, Chang RN, Allahabadi S, Coughlan MJ, Prentice HA, Maletis GB (2022) Acute and subacute anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions are associated with a higher risk of revision and reoperation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30:3311–3321
Eriksson K, von Essen C, Jönhagen S, Barenius B (2018) No risk of arthrofibrosis after acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:2875–2882
Failla MJ, Logerstedt DS, Grindem H, Axe MJ, Risberg MA, Engebretsen L et al (2016) Does extended preoperative rehabilitation influence outcomes 2 years after acl reconstruction? A comparative effectiveness study between the MOON and delaware-Oslo ACL cohorts. Am J Sports Med 44:2608–2614
Forsythe B, Lu Y, Agarwalla A, Ezuma CO, Patel BH, Nwachukwu BU et al (2021) Delaying ACL reconstruction beyond 6 months from injury impacts likelihood for clinically significant outcome improvement. Knee 33:290–297
Giordano L, Maffulli N, Carimati G, Phd EM, Volpi P (2022) Increased time to surgery after ACL tear in females results in greater risk of medial meniscus tear. Arthroscopy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2022.10.014
Irie K, Uchiyama E, Iwaso H (2003) Intraarticular inflammatory cytokines in acute anterior cruciate ligament injured knee. Knee 10:93–96
James EW, Dawkins BJ, Schachne JM, Ganley TJ, Kocher MS, Anderson CN et al (2021) Early operative versus delayed operative versus nonoperative treatment of pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 49:4008–4017
Kolin DA, Dawkins B, Park J, Fabricant PD, Gilmore A, Seeley M et al (2021) ACL reconstruction delay in pediatric and adolescent patients is associated with a progressive increased risk of medial meniscal tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 103:1368–1373
Mohtadi NG, Webster-Bogaert S, Fowler PJ (1991) Limitation of motion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A case-control study. Am J Sports Med 19:620–624
Musahl V, Karlsson J (2019) Anterior cruciate ligament tear. N Engl J Med 380:2341–2348
Papageorgiou CD, Gil JE, Kanamori A, Fenwick JA, Woo SL, Fu FH (2001) The biomechanical interdependence between the anterior cruciate ligament replacement graft and the medial meniscus. Am J Sports Med 29:226–231
Prodromidis AD, Drosatou C, Mourikis A, Sutton PM, Charalambous CP (2021) Relationship between timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and chondral injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520964486
Prodromidis AD, Drosatou C, Thivaios GC, Zreik N, Charalambous CP (2021) Timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and relationship with meniscal tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 49:2551–2562
Shelbourne KD, Wilckens JH, Mollabashy A, DeCarlo M (1991) Arthrofibrosis in acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The effect of timing of reconstruction and rehabilitation. Am J Sports Med 19:332–336
Smith PA, Bezold WA, Cook CR, Krych AJ, Stuart MJ, Wijdicks CA et al (2022) Kinematic analysis of lateral meniscal oblique radial tears in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees: untreated versus repair versus partial meniscectomy. Am J Sports Med 50:2381–2389
Svantesson E, Hamrin Senorski E, Östergaard M, Grassi A, Krupic F, Westin O et al (2020) Graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a concomitant non-surgically treated medial collateral ligament injury does not influence the risk of revision. Arthroscopy 36:199–211
Tomihara T, Hashimoto Y, Takahashi S, Taniuchi M, Takigami J, Okazaki S et al (2021) risk factors related to the presence of meniscal injury and irreparable meniscal tear at primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 9:2325967121989036
Vermeijden HD, Yang XA, Rademakers MV, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, van der List JP, DiFelice GS (2022) Early and delayed surgery for isolated acl and multiligamentous knee injuries have equivalent results: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465211069356
von Essen C, Eriksson K, Barenius B (2020) Acute ACL reconstruction shows superior clinical results and can be performed safely without an increased risk of developing arthrofibrosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:2036–2043
Funding
This study did not receive any outside funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This study was granted Exempt status from the UCSF Institutional Review Board (#21-3336).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Freshman, R.D., Truong, N.M., Cevallos, N. et al. Delayed ACL reconstruction increases rates of concomitant procedures and risk of subsequent surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 2897–2905 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07249-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07249-z