Skip to main content
Log in

Iliotibial band autograft is a suitable alternative graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Despite encouraging clinical, biomechanical and histological results, ACL reconstruction using the ITB was slowly abandoned. The hypothesis was that the current literature supports the use of ITB as the graft of choice for ACL reconstruction because of its good outcomes.

Methods

A systematic search of the literature was performed in the PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Ovid databases to identify published clinical studies relevant to ACL reconstruction with ITB autograft and studies comparing ITB autograft with bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) and hamstring (HT) autografts (none were found). The results of the eligible studies were analyzed in terms of graft failure, instrumented knee laxity measurements, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, Lysholm score, objective and subjective International Knee Documentation committee (IKDC) scores, Tegner activity score, return to sports rate, return to sports at pre-injury level and complications.

Results

Nineteen clinical studies including 1,210 patients with ACL reconstruction met the inclusion criteria. Graft failure occurred after ITB autograft in 4.2% of patients. Postoperative mean side-to-side laxity was 1.41 mm with 21% of patients having greater than 3 mm side-to-side difference. Lachman test and pivot-shift test were negative (grade 0) in 57% and 85%, respectively, and were grade 0 or 1 in 95% and 97%, respectively. Functional outcomes were satisfactory in 84% of patients with good to excellent results (Lysholm score > 84). Mean postoperative Lysholm score was 93.3 and 84% of patients had an objective IKDC grade of A or B. Mean postoperative Tegner score was 6.8. The return to sports rate was 89% and 61% of patients returned to their pre-injury level. A comparison of 89 ITB versus 80 BPTB autografts revealed no significant differences in graft failure (n.s.), instrumented mean side-to-side knee laxity difference (n.s.) or Tegner score (n.s.).

Conclusion

The graft survival rate and clinical and functional outcomes for ITB autograft are satisfactory. By allowing ACL reconstruction and lateral tenodesis to be done with a single, continuous, pedicled graft through an outside-in femoral tunnel, this technique may become the preferred alternative for primary or secondary ACL surgery.

Level of evidence

Level IV

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACL:

Anterior cruciate ligament

BPTB:

Bone–patellar tendon–bone

CI:

Confidence intervals

CMS:

Coleman methodological score

HT:

Hamstring

IKDC:

International knee documentation committee

ITB:

Iliotibial band

LCL:

Lateral collateral ligament

MCMS:

Modified Coleman methodological score

n.s.:

Non-significant

OCEBM:

Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine

PRISMA:

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses

QT:

Quadriceps tendon

ROM:

Range of motion

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Abreu FG, Pioger C, Franck F, Freychet B, Vieira TD, Sonnery-Cottet B (2020) Femoral physeal-sparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the iliotibial band: over-the-top technique. Arthrosc Tech 9:e691–e695

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson AF, Snyder RB, Lipscomb AB (1994) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons augmented by the losee iliotibial band tenodesis. A long-term study. Am J Sports Med 22:620–626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA (2011) Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med 45:596–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bak K, Jørgensen U, Ekstrand J, Scavenius M (1999) Results of reconstruction of acute ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament with an iliotibial band autograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:111–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bak K, Jørgensen U, Ekstrand J, Scavenius M (2001) Reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees in soccer players with an iliotibial band autograft. A prospective study of 132 reconstructed knees followed for 4 (2–7) years. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11:16–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bertoia JT, Urovitz EP, Richards RR, Gross AE (1985) Anterior cruciate reconstruction using the MacIntosh lateral-substitution over-the-top repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1183–1188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carmichael JR, Cross MJ (2009) Why bone-patella tendon-bone grafts should still be considered the gold standard for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med 43:323–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan DB, Temple HT, Latta LL, Mahure S, Dennis J, Kaplan LD (2010) A biomechanical comparison of fan-folded, single-looped fascia lata with other graft tissues as a suitable substitute for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 26:1641–1647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Claes S, Verdonk P, Forsyth R, Bellemans J (2011) The “ligamentization” process in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: what happens to the human graft? A systematic review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 39:2476–2483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Claes S, Vereecke E, Maes M, Victor J, Verdonk P, Bellemans J (2013) Anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. J Anat 223:321–328

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Delcroix GJ-R, Kaimrajh DN, Baria D, Cooper S, Reiner T, Latta L, D’Ippolito G, Schiller PC, Temple HT (2013) Histologic, biomechanical, and biological evaluation of fan-folded iliotibial band allografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 29:756–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dempsey SM, Tregonning RJ (1993) Nine-year follow-up results of two methods of MacIntosh anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 294:216–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dodelin A, Baillet JM, Jaeger JH (2008) Ligamentoplastie mixte au fascia lata pour rupture du LCA chez les patients de plus de 40 ans. J Traumatol Sport 15:207–213

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ekstrand J (1989) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in athletes, using a fascia lata graft: a review with preliminary results of a new concept. Int J Sports Med 10:225–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Engebretsen L, Lew WD, Lewis JL, Hunter RE (1990) The effect of an iliotibial tenodesis on intraarticular graft forces and knee joint motion. Am J Sports Med 18:169–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Follmann D, Elliott P, Suh I, Cutler J (1992) Variance imputation for overviews of clinical trials with continuous response. J Clin Epidemiol 45:769–773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Freedman KB, D’Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A, Bach BR (2003) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 31:2–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group (2008) What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 336:995–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haillotte G, Hardy A, Granger B, Noailles T, Khiami F (2017) Early strength recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the fascia lata. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103:1021–1025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Helito CP, Camargo DB, Sobrado MF, Bonadio MB, Giglio PN, Pécora JR, Camanho GL, Demange MK (2018) Combined reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament in chronic ACL injuries leads to better clinical outcomes than isolated ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:3652–3659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hewison CE, Tran MN, Kaniki N, Remtulla A, Bryant D, Getgood AM (2015) Lateral extra-articular tenodesis reduces rotational laxity when combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of the literature. Arthroscopy 31:2022–2034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hey-Groves EW (1917) Operation for the repair of the crucial ligaments. The Lancet 190:674–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Imbert P, Lustig S, Steltzlen C, Batailler C, Colombet P, Dalmay F, Bertiaux S, D’ingrado P, Ehkirch FP, Louis ML, Pailhé R, Panisset JC, Schlaterrer B, Sonnery-Cottet B, Sigwalt L, Saragaglia D, Lutz C, (2017) Résultats à moyen terme des plasties combinées intra- et extra-articulaires du ligament croisé antérieur : comparaison avec les plasties intra-articulaires isolées de la littérature. Étude multicentrique de la Société francophone d’arthroscopie (SFA). Rev Chir Orthopédique Traumatol 103:S204–S208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jaeger JH, Van Hille W, Lutz C, Villeminot J (2003) La ligamentoplastie du ligament croisé antérieur au fascia lata selon la technique de Mac Intosh modifiée. Pathologie ligamentaire Genou. Springer, Paris, pp 399–409

    Google Scholar 

  27. Johnston DR, Baker A, Rose C, Scotland TR, Maffulli N (2003) Long-term outcome of MacIntosh reconstruction of chronic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency using fascia lata. J Orthop Sci 8:789–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jørgensen U, Bak K, Ekstrand J, Scavenius M (2001) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with the iliotibial band autograft in patients with chronic knee instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:137–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jørgensen U, Thomsen HS (2000) Behavior of the graft within the bone tunnels following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, studied by cinematic magnetic resonance imaging. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:32–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Khiami F, Wajsfisz A, Meyer A, Rolland E, Catonné Y, Sariali E (2013) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with fascia lata using a minimally invasive arthroscopic harvesting technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:99–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kocher MS, Garg S, Micheli LJ (2006) Physeal sparing reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in skeletally immature prepubescent children and adolescents. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88 Suppl 1 Pt 2:283–293

  32. Kocher MS, Garg S, Micheli LJ (2005) Physeal sparing reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in skeletally immature prepubescent children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2371–2379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kocher MS, Heyworth BE, Fabricant PD, Tepolt FA, Micheli LJ (2018) Outcomes of physeal-sparing ACL reconstruction with iliotibial band autograft in skeletally immature prepubescent children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:1087–1094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee DW, Kim JG, Cho SI, Kim DH (2019) Clinical outcomes of isolated revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or in combination with anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 47:324–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lutz C, Sonnery-Cottet B, Imbert P, Barbosa NC, Tuteja S, Jaeger J-H (2016) Combined anterior and anterolateral stabilization of the knee with the iliotibial band. Arthrosc Tech 5:e251-256

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Macintosh DL (1976) Lateral substitution reconstruction. J Bone Jt Surg 58:142

    Google Scholar 

  37. Marot V, Valette A, Courtot L, Lucena T, Reina N, Cavaignac E (2021) Outside-in anterior cruciate ligament revision with lateral tenodesis and high-strength suture augmentation is easy to perform with the iliotibial band. Arthrosc Tech 10:e1321–e1326

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Marshall JL, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL, Reider B (1979) The anterior cruciate ligament: a technique of repair and reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 143:97–106

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mirouse G, Rousseau R, Casabianca L, Ettori MA, Granger B, Pascal-Moussellard H, Khiami F (2016) Return to sports and functional results after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by fascia lata autograft. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102:863–866

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mouarbes D, Menetrey J, Marot V, Courtot L, Berard E, Cavaignac E (2019) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes for quadriceps tendon autograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring-tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 47:3531–3540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Natri A, Järvinen M, Kannus P (1996) Primary repair plus intra-articular iliotibial band augmentation in the treatment of an acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture. A follow-up study of 70 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 115:22–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Noyes FR, Butler DL, Grood ES, Zernicke RF, Hefzy MS (1984) Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:344–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group (2011) The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence. Accessed 23 May 2021

  45. Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L (2008) Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. J Clin Epidemiol 61:991–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Poulsen M, Fabrin J, Carstensen JP, Ulnits L, Lausten GS (2003) Reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament using bone-patellar tendon-borne graft or fascia lata graft. A retrospective study of functional results. Ugeskr Laeger 165:682–685

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sachleben BC, Nasreddine AY, Nepple JJ, Tepolt FA, Kasser JR, Kocher MS (2019) Reconstruction of symptomatic congenital anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. J Pediatr Orthop 39:59–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Schlatterer B, Jund S, Delépine F, Razafindratsiva C, de Peretti F (2006) Acute anterior cruciate ligament repair with combined intra- and extra-articular reconstruction using an iliotibial band with the modified MacIntosh technique: a five-year follow-up study of 50 pivoting sport athletes. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 92:778–787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Smeets K, Bellemans J, Scheys L, Eijnde BO, Slane J, Claes S (2017) Mechanical Analysis of Extra-Articular Knee Ligaments. Part two: Tendon grafts used for knee ligament reconstruction. Knee 24:957–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Somer L, Vukadinović S, Somer T, Mikić Z, Milankov M (1990) Histologic changes in fascia lata transplants in the replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee in dogs. Acta Chir Iugosl 37(Suppl 1):51–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sonnery-Cottet B, Lutz C, Daggett M, Dalmay F, Freychet B, Niglis L, Imbert P (2016) The involvement of the anterolateral ligament in rotational control of the knee. Am J Sports Med 44:1209–1214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Stensbirk F, Thorborg K, Konradsen L, Jørgensen U, Hölmich P (2014) Iliotibial band autograft versus bone-patella-tendon-bone autograft, a possible alternative for ACL reconstruction: a 15-year prospective randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2094–2101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sugimoto D, Whited AJ, Brodeur JJ, Liotta ES, Williams KA, Kocher MS, Micheli LJ, Heyworth BE (2020) Long-term follow-up of skeletally immature patients with physeal-sparing combined extra-/intra-articular iliotibial band anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 3-dimensional motion analysis. Am J Sports Med 48:1900–1906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Tøndevold E (1998) Danish orthopedic society. Acta Orthop Scand 69:44–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Trojani C, Beaufils P, Burdin G, Bussière C, Chassaing V, Djian P, Dubrana F, Ehkirch F-P, Franceschi J-P, Hulet C, Jouve F, Potel J-F, Sbihi A, Neyret P, Colombet P (2012) Revision ACL reconstruction: influence of a lateral tenodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1565–1570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Weber AE, Zuke W, Mayer EN, Forsythe B, Getgood A, Verma NN, Bach BR, Bedi A, Cole BJ (2019) Lateral augmentation procedures in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anatomic, biomechanical, imaging, and clinical evidence. Am J Sports Med 47:740–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Willimon SC, Jones CR, Herzog MM, May KH, Leake MJ, Busch MT (2015) Micheli anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature youths: a retrospective case series with a mean 3-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 43:2974–2981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Wren TL, Beltran V, Katzel MJ, Conrad-Forrest AS, VandenBerg CD (2021) Iliotibial band autograft provides the fastest recovery of knee extensor mechanism function in pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:7492

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Yamaguchi S, Sasho T, Tsuchiya A, Wada Y, Moriya H (2006) Long term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with iliotibial tract: 6-, 13-, and 24-year longitudinal follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1094–1100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TL participated in the design of the study, performed data collection and drafted the manuscript. VM helped to draft the manuscript. LC helped to performed data collection. CL performed a critical review of manuscript. EB performed the statistical analysis. NR performed a critical review of manuscript. EC devised the study and participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Etienne Cavaignac.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lucena, T., Cavaignac, M., Marot, V. et al. Iliotibial band autograft is a suitable alternative graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 1679–1690 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06701-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06701-w

Keywords

Navigation