Skip to main content
Log in

Mean femoral cartilage thickness is higher in athletes as compared with sedentary individuals

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

It is unclear how high-intensity physical activity (HIPA) affects the knee joint, specifically the femoral cartilage (FC). Therefore, the aims of this study were to evaluate FC thickness via ultrasound among elite athletes involved in different types of HIPA, and to determine whether there is a correlation between serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (sCOMP) and rectus femoris (RF) thickness.

Method

A total of 132 male individuals participated in this study and were assigned to two groups, the sedentary (n = 43, 23.9 ± 3.7) and athlete groups (n = 89, 22.7 ± 4.6), which did not significantly differ in age. The athletes were elite and performed HIPA during sports such as volleyball (n = 20), soccer (n = 21), basketball (n = 28), and weightlifting (n = 20). RF thickness and three (mid-point) measurements were obtained for each knee. The mean FC thickness for each knee was defined as the sum of the medial, lateral condyles, and intercondylar areas. Blood samples for sCOMP analyses were also obtained.

Results

All the measurements of the FC of both knees were significantly higher in the athletes than in the sedentary individuals (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001). The mean right and left FC values were also higher in the athletes (p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that participation in sporting activities was a significant predictor associated with the right and left mean FC thickness (p < 0.001 for both). No significant differences in the sCOMP levels were found between the two groups.

Conclusion

It was found that the mean FC was higher among athletes than among sedentary individuals. As a result, it is suggested that sports’ participation is an independent factor associated with the right and left mean FC thickness.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdelghani BK, Slouma M, Souabni L, Kassab S, Chekili S, Laatar A, Zakraoui L (2014) AB0988 effect of football on knee cartilage thickness: an ultrasonographic assessment. Ann Rheum Dis 73(2):1127–1127

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anandacoomarasamy A, Leibman S, Smith G, Caterson I, Giuffre B, Fransen M et al (2012) Weight loss in obese people has structure-modifying effects on medial but not on lateral knee articular cartilage. Ann Rheum Dis 71(1):26–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Antony B, Venn A, Cicuttini F, March L, Blizzard L, Dwyer T et al (2016) Association of body composition and hormonal and inflammatory factors with tibial cartilage volume and sex difference in cartilage volume in young adults. Arthritis Care Res 68(4):517–525

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bank R, Bayliss M, Lafeber F, Maroudas A, Tekoppele J (1998) Ageing and zonal variation in post-translational modification of collagen in normal human articular cartilage. Biochem J 330(1):345–351

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Boesen M, Ellegaard K, Henriksen M, Gudbergsen H, Hansen P, Bliddal H et al (2017) Osteoarthritis year in review 2016: imaging. Osteoarthr Cartil 25(2):216–226

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Buckwalter JA (2003) Sports, joint injury, and posttraumatic osteoarthritis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 33(10):578–588

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buckwalter JA, Lane NE (1997) Athletics and osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 25(6):873–881

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Castaño Betancourt MC, Cailotto F, Kerkhof HJ, Cornelis FMF, Doherty SA, Hart DJ et al (2012) Genome-wide association and functional studies identify the DOT1L gene to be involved in cartilage thickness and hip osteoarthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(21):8218–8223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Celik O, Salci Y, Ak E, Kalaci A, Korkusuz F (2013) Serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein accumulation decreases significantly after 12weeks of running but not swimming and cycling training—A randomised controlled trial. Knee 20(1):19–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cicuttini F, Forbes A, Morris K, Darling S, Bailey M, Stuckey S (1999) Gender differences in knee cartilage volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthr Cartil 7(3):265–271

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ding C, Cicuttini F, Scott F, Glisson M, Jones G (2003) Sex differences in knee cartilage volume in adults: role of body and bone size, age and physical activity. Rheumatology 42(11):1317–1323

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Drawer S, Fuller CW (2001) Propensity for osteoarthritis and lower limb joint pain in retired professional soccer players. Br J Sports Med 35(6):402–408

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Eckstein F, Faber S, Mühlbauer R, Hohe J, Englmeier K-H, Reiser M, Putz R (2002) Functional adaptation of human joints to mechanical stimuli. Osteoarthr Cartil 10(1):44–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Putz R (2006) The effects of exercise on human articular cartilage. J Anat 208(4):491–512

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Erhart-Hledik JC, Favre J, Asay JL, Smith RL, Giori NJ, Mündermann A, Andriacchi TP (2012) A relationship between mechanically-induced changes in serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) and changes in cartilage thickness after 5 years. Osteoarthr Cartil 20(11):1309–1315

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Evangelou E, Kerkhof HJ, Styrkarsdottir U, Ntzani EE, Bos SD, Esko T et al (2014) A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies novel variants associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Ann Rheum Dis 73(12):2130–2136

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Firner S, Willwacher S, de Marées M, Bleuel J, Zaucke F, Brüggemann GP, Niehoff A (2018) Effect of increased mechanical knee joint loading during running on the serum concentration of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP). J Orthop Res 36(7):1937–1946

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gratzke C, Hudelmaier M, Hitzl W, Glaser C, Eckstein F (2007) Knee cartilage morphologic characteristics and muscle status of professional weight lifters and sprinters. Am J Sports Med 35(8):1346–1353

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grzelak P, Domzalski M, Majos A, Podgórski M, Stefanczyk L, Krochmalski M, Polguj M (2014) Thickening of the knee joint cartilage in elite weightlifters as a potential adaptation mechanism. Clin Anat 27(6):920–928

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoch JM, Mattacola CG, Bush HM, Medina McKeon JM, Hewett TE, Lattermann C (2012) Longitudinal documentation of serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein and patient-reported outcomes in collegiate soccer athletes over the course of an athletic season. Am J Sports Med 40(11):2583–2589

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hudelmaier M, Glaser C, Hausschild A, Burgkart R, Eckstein F (2006) Effects of joint unloading and reloading on human cartilage morphology and function, muscle cross-sectional areas, and bone density—a quantitative case report. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 6(3):284–290

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones G, Bennell K, Cicuttini FM (2003) Effect of physical activity on cartilage development in healthy kids. Br J Sports Med 37(5):382–383

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kara M, Tiftik T, Öken Ö, Akkaya N, Tunc H, Özçakar L (2013) Ultrasonographic measurement of femoral cartilage thickness in patients with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 45(2):145–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Karanfil Y, Babayeva N, Dönmez G, Diren HB, Eryılmaz M, Doral MN, Korkusuz F (2018) Thirty minutes of running exercise decreases T2 signal intensity but not thickness of the knee joint cartilage: A 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging study. Cartilage 10(4):444–450

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kersting UG, Stubendorff JJ, Schmidt MC, Brüggemann GP (2005) Changes in knee cartilage volume and serum COMP concentration after running exercise. Osteoarthr Cartil 13(10):925–934

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kim HJ, Lee YH, Kim CK (2009) Changes in serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP), plasma CPK and plasma hs-CRP in relation to running distance in a marathon (42.195 km) and an ultra-marathon (200 km) race. Eur J Appl Physiol 105(5):765–770

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kujala UM, Kettunen J, Paananen H, Aalto T, Battié MC, Impivaara O, Videman T, Sarna S (1995) Knee osteoarthritis in former runners, soccer players, weight lifters, and shooters. Arthritis Rheum 38(4):539–546

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Malas FÜ, Özçakar L, Kaymak B, Ulaşli A, Güner S, Kara M, Akinci A (2013) Effects of different strength training on muscle architecture: clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation in knee osteoarthritis. PM R 5(8):655–662

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Martel-Pelletier J, Barr AJ, Cicuttini FM, Conaghan PG, Cooper C, Goldring MB et al (2016) Osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Dis Prim 2(1):16072

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mezhov V, Ciccutini FM, Hanna FS, Brennan SL, Wang YY, Urquhart DM, Wluka AE (2014) Does obesity affect knee cartilage? A systematic review of magnetic resonance imaging data. Obes Rev 15(2):143–157

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mithoefer K, Peterson L, Zenobi-Wong M, Mandelbaum BR (2015) Cartilage issues in football—today’s problems and tomorrow’s solutions. Br J Sports Med 49(9):590–596

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Mosher TJ, Liu Y, Torok CM (2010) Functional cartilage MRI T2 mapping: evaluating the effect of age and training on knee cartilage response to running. Osteoarthr Cartil 18(3):358–364

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mühlbauer R, Lukasz S, Faber S, Stammberger T, Eckstein F (2000) Comparison of knee joint cartilage thickness in triathletes and physically inactive volunteers based on magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional analysis. Am J Sports Med 28(4):541–546

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mündermann A, Dyrby CO, Andriacchi TP, King KB (2005) Serum concentration of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) is sensitive to physiological cyclic loading in healthy adults. Osteoarthr Cartil 13(1):34–38

    Google Scholar 

  35. Neidhart M, Hauser N, Paulsson M, Dicesare PE, Michel BA, Häuselmann HJ (1997) Small fragments of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein in synovial fluid and serum as markers for cartilage degradation. Br J Rheumatol 36(11):1151–1160

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Neidhart M, Müller-Ladner U, Frey W, Bosserhoff AK, Colombani PC, Frey-Rindova P et al (2000) Increased serum levels of non-collagenous matrix proteins (cartilage oligomeric matrix protein and melanoma inhibitory activity) in marathon runners. Osteoarthr Cartil 8(3):222–229

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Özçakar L, Kara M, Wang TG, De Muynck M (2015) EURO-MUSCULUS/USPRM basic scanning protocols: a practical guide for physiatrists. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 51(4):477–478

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Roberts HM, Moore JP, Griffith-McGeever CL, Fortes MB, Thom JM (2016) The effect of vigorous running and cycling on serum COMP, lubricin, and femoral cartilage thickness: a pilot study. Eur J Appl Physiol 116(8):1467–1477

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Roberts HM, Moore JP, Thom JM (2018) The effect of aerobic walking and lower body resistance exercise on serum COMP and hyaluronan, in both males and females. Eur J Appl Physiol 118(6):1095–1105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sakthiswary R, Rajalingam S, Hussein H, Sridharan R, Asrul AW (2017) Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) in rheumatoid arthritis and its correlation with sonographic knee cartilage thickness and disease activity. Clin Rheumatol 36(12):2683–2688

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Saxne T, Heinegård D (1992) Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein: a novel marker of cartilage turnover detectable in synovial fluid and blood. Rheumatology 31(9):583–591

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tunç H, Öken Ö, Kara M, Tiftik T, Doǧu B, Ünlü Z, Özçakar L (2012) Ultrasonographic measurement of the femoral cartilage thickness in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Int J Rehabil Res 35(3):203–207

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ulasli AM, Ozcakar L, Murrel WD (2019) Ultrasound imaging and guidance in the management of knee osteoarthritis in regenerative medicine field. J Clin Orthop Trauma 10(1):24–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Urquhart DM, Wluka AE, Teichtahl AJ, Cicuttini FM (2007) The effect of physical activity on the knee joint: is it good or bad? Br J Sports Med 41(9):546–547

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. van Melick N, Meddeler BM, Hoogeboom TJ, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG, van Cingel REH (2017) How to determine leg dominance: the agreement between self-reported and observed performance in healthy adults. PLoS ONE 12(12):e0189876

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Vanwanseele B, Eckstein F, Knecht H, Spaepen A, Stüssi E (2003) Longitudinal analysis of cartilage atrophy in the knees of patients with spinal cord injury. Arthritis Rheum 48(12):3377–3381

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Xu C, Silder A, Zhang J, Reifman J, Unnikrishnan G (2017) A cross-sectional study of the effects of load carriage on running characteristics and tibial mechanical stress: implications for stress-fracture injuries in women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18(1):125

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. We want to thank all the individuals who participated in our study, as well as Melda Pelin Yargıç and Mustafa Çatak for their contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naila Babayeva.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Babayeva, N., Dönmez, G., Özçakar, L. et al. Mean femoral cartilage thickness is higher in athletes as compared with sedentary individuals. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 1206–1214 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06146-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06146-7

Keywords

Navigation