Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bone marrow aspirate concentration provided better results in cartilage regeneration to microfracture in knee of osteoarthritic patients

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether microfracture with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) improves functional outcome and cartilage regeneration better than microfracture alone in patients undergoing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

Among 436 patients treated with HTO for medial unicompartmental OA with varus deformity between 2010 and 2016, clinical outcomes were retrospectively compared between the microfracture alone group (group I, 43 cases) and microfracture with BMAC augmentation group (group II, 48 cases). Of these, 64 patients underwent a second-look arthroscopic assessment. Clinical outcomes were compared based on the Knee Society Score (KSS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Cartilage regeneration was assessed according to Koshino’s staging system and the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Cartilage Repair Assessment (CRA) grading system.

Results

At the last follow-up, there were no significant intergroup differences in terms of KSS for pain and function (p > 0.05). Moreover, WOMAC scores were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). Regarding second-look arthroscopy findings, according to Koshino’s staging system, there was no significant intergroup difference in terms of defect coverage (p = 0.187). However, group II showed a significantly better mean CRA score than group I (p = 0.035).

Conclusion

There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes and cartilage regeneration between the groups. However, the CRA score was significantly higher with BMAC augmentation and microfracture than microfracture alone. Therefore, BMAC augmentation had a synergistic effect for a better cartilage regeneration, although studies with a longer follow-up might help to confirm whether microfracture with BMAC augmentation would ensure better clinical outcomes than microfracture alone for the treatment of knee OA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akizuki S, Yasukawa Y, Takizawa T (1997) Does arthroscopic abrasion arthroplasty promote cartilage regeneration in osteoarthritic knees with eburnation? A prospective study of high tibial osteotomy with abrasion arthroplasty versus high tibial osteotomy alone. Arthroscopy 13:9–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bedi A, Feeley BT, Williams RJ 3rd (2010) Management of articular cartilage defects of the knee. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92:994–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biant LC, McNicholas MJ, Sprowson AP, Spalding T (2015) The surgical management of symptomatic articular cartilage defects of the knee: consensus statements from United Kingdom knee surgeons. Knee 22:446–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bode G, Ogon P, Pestka J, Zwingmann J, Feucht M, Sudkamp N et al (2015) Clinical outcome and return to work following single-stage combined autologous chondrocyte implantation and high tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop 39:689–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brittberg M, Winalski CS (2003) Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 2):58–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cavallo M, Sayyed-Hosseinian SH, Parma A, Buda R, Mosca M, Giannini S (2018) Combination of high tibial osteotomy and autologous bone marrow derived cell implantation in early osteoarthritis of knee: a preliminary study. Arch Bone Jt Surg 6:112–118

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Cerejo R, Dunlop DD, Cahue S, Channin D, Song J, Sharma L (2002) The influence of alignment on risk of knee osteoarthritis progression according to baseline stage of disease. Arthritis Rheum 46:2632–2636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chadli L, Cottalorda J, Delpont M, Mazeau P, Thouvenin Y, Louahem D (2017) Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty in osteochondritis dissecans of the patella in adolescents. Int Orthop 41:197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cotter EJ, Wang KC, Yanke AB, Chubinskaya S (2018) Bone marrow aspirate concentrate for cartilage defects of the knee: from bench to bedside evidence. Cartilage 9:161–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dettoni F, Bonasia DE, Castoldi F, Bruzzone M, Blonna D, Rossi R (2010) High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthrosis of the knee: a review of the literature. Iowa Orthop J 30:131–140

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferruzzi A, Buda R, Cavallo M, Timoncini A, Natali S, Giannini S (2014) Cartilage repair procedures associated with high tibial osteotomy in varus knees: clinical results at 11 years' follow-up. Knee 21:445–450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Floerkemeier S, Staubli AE, Schroeter S, Goldhahn S, Lobenhoffer P (2013) Outcome after high tibial open-wedge osteotomy: a retrospective evaluation of 533 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:170–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fujisawa Y, Masuhara K, Shiomi S (1979) The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. An arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints. Orthop Clin North Am 10:585–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gobbi A, Whyte GP (2016) One-stage cartilage repair using a hyaluronic acid-based scaffold with activated bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells compared with microfracture: five-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 44:2846–2854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huh SW, Shetty AA, Ahmed S, Lee DH, Kim SJ (2016) Autologous bone-marrow mesenchymal cell induced chondrogenesis (MCIC). J Clin Orthop Trauma 7:153–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirschmann MT, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Leclerq V, Hess S (2019) Functional knee phenotypes: a novel classification for phenotyping the coronal lower limb alignment based on the native alignment in young non-osteoarthritic patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(5):1394–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jung WH, Takeuchi R, Chun CW, Lee JS, Jeong JH (2015) Comparison of results of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with and without subchondral drilling. Arthroscopy 31:673–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, Hamid KS, Steinhaus ME, Williams RJ 3rd (2017) Analysis of outcomes for high tibial osteotomies performed with cartilage restoration techniques. Arthroscopy 33:486–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim KI, Seo MC, Song SJ, Bae DK, Kim DH, Lee SH (2017) Change of chondral lesions and predictive factors after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with a locked plate system. Am J Sports Med 45:1615–1621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim MS, Koh IJ, Choi YJ, Pak KH, In Y (2017) Collagen augmentation improves the quality of cartilage repair after microfracture in patients undergoing high tibial osteotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 45:1845–1855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim YS, Koh YG (2018) Comparative matched-pair analysis of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with versus without an injection of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells for varus knee osteoarthritis: clinical and second-look arthroscopic results. Am J Sports Med 46:2669–2677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Koshino T, Wada S, Ara Y, Saito T (2003) Regeneration of degenerated articular cartilage after high tibial valgus osteotomy for medial compartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee 10:229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kumagai K, Akamatsu Y, Kobayashi H, Kusayama Y, Saito T (2018) Mosaic osteochondral autograft transplantation versus bone marrow stimulation technique as a concomitant procedure with opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy for spontaneous osteonecrosis of the medial femoral condyle. Arthroscopy 34(1):233–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsunaga D, Akizuki S, Takizawa T, Yamazaki I, Kuraishi J (2007) Repair of articular cartilage and clinical outcome after osteotomy with microfracture or abrasion arthroplasty for medial gonarthrosis. Knee 14:465–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pascale W, Luraghi S, Perico L, Pascale V (2011) Do microfractures improve high tibial osteotomy outcome? Orthopedics 34:e251–255

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Redler LH, Caldwell JM, Schulz BM, Levine WN (2012) Management of articular cartilage defects of the knee. Phys Sportsmed 40:20–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Siebold R, Karidakis G, Feil S, Fernandez F (2016) Second-look assessment after all-arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation with spheroides at the knee joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:1678–1685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Spahn G, Hofmann GO, von Engelhardt LV, Li M, Neubauer H, Klinger HM (2013) The impact of a high tibial valgus osteotomy and unicondylar medial arthroplasty on the treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:96–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All named authors had substantially contributed to the research and manuscript conducting. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.co.kr) for English language editing.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong-Keun Seon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee at Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, QH., Chung, YW., Na, SM. et al. Bone marrow aspirate concentration provided better results in cartilage regeneration to microfracture in knee of osteoarthritic patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 1090–1097 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06099-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06099-x

Keywords

Navigation