Skip to main content
Log in

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone–patellar tendon–bone graft is associated with higher and earlier return to sports as compared to hamstring tendon graft

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To study the effect of age, duration of injury, type of graft and concomitant knee injuries on return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Method

One-hundred and sixteen athletes underwent ACL reconstruction using either bone–patellar tendon–bone graft (BPTB; n = 58) or semitendinosus-gracilis graft (n = 58), depending upon their random number sequences. Five variables were analyzed in terms of their effect on return to sports-age, type of graft, time interval between injury and surgery, chondral damage and meniscal tears.

Results

Fifty-three out of 73 (72.6%) athletes aged between 16 and 25 years and 21/43 (49%) athletes aged between 25 and 40 years returned to sports (p = 0.02). The mean time to return to sports was 9.7 ± 2.1 months and 10.8 ± 1.7 months in athletes aged < 25 years and 25–40 years, respectively (p = 0.04). ACL reconstruction with BPTB graft (43/58) was associated with higher rate of return to sports as compared to hamstring tendon graft (31/58; p = 0.02). The mean duration of return to sports with BPTB and STGPI graft was 9.7 ± 2.0 months and 10.7 ± 2.0 months, respectively (p = 0.02). 29/36 (80.5%) patients operated between 2 and 6 months, 18/29 (62%) operated in < 2 months, and 27/51 (53%) operated after 6 months of injury had returned to sports (p = 0.03). Athletes who were operated within 2 months of the injury were the earliest to return to sports (9.4 ± 2.1 months), followed by those operated within 2–6 months (9.9 ± 1.9 months) and lastly by the ones operated after 6 months of the injury (10.9 ± 2.1 months; p = 0.04).

Conclusions

The rate of return to sports was observed to be higher in athletes younger than 25 years as compared to older athletes (> 25 years). ACL reconstruction with BPTB graft was associated with higher and earlier returns to sports as compared to hamstring graft. The rate of return to sports was highest if surgery was performed between 2 and 6 months after the injury.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Zaccherotti G, De Biase P (1994) Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 22:211–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson AF, Anderson CN (2014) Correlation of meniscal and articular cartilage injuries in children and adolescents with timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 43:275–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE (2014) Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors. Br J Sports Med 48:1543–1552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE (2012) Return-to-sport outcomes at 2 to 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 40:41–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA (2011) Return to the preinjury level of competitive sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: two-thirds of patients have not returned by 12 months after surgery. Am J Sports Med 39:538–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aune AK, Holm I, Risberg MA, Jensen HK, Steen H (2001) Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft compared with patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A randomized study with two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 29:722–728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cinque ME, Hannon CP, Bohl DD, Erickson BJ, Verma NN, Cole BJ et al (2017) Return to sport and performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in national football league linemen. Orthop J Sports Med 5:2325967117711681

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Doyle K, Wilson F, King E (2013) Factors which influence return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery: a narrative review. Int J Sports Med 14:168–184

    Google Scholar 

  9. Erickson BJ, Harris JD, Cole BJ, Frank RM, Fillingham YA, Ellman MB et al (2014) Performance and return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in National Hockey League Players. Orthop J Sports Med 2:2325967114548831

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Feller J, Webster KE (2013) Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop 37:285–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Forster MC, Forster IW (2005) Patellar tendon or four-strand hamstring? A systematic review of autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 12:225–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gifstad T, Sole A, Strand T, Uppheim G, Grøntvedt T, Drogset JO (2013) Long-term follow-up of patellar tendon grafts or hamstring tendon grafts in endoscopic ACL reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:576–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gudas R, Jurkonis R, Smailys A (2018) Comparison of return to pre-injury sport after 10 mm size bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) versus 8 mm hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective study with a two-year follow-up. Med Sci Monit 24:987–996

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta R, Bahadur R, Malhotra A, Masih GD, Gupta P (2016) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft with preserved insertions. Arthrosc Tech 5:e269–e274

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta R, Masih GD, Chander G, Bachhal V (2016) Delay in surgery predisposes to meniscal and chondral injuries in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees. Indian J Orthop 50:492–498

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Heijne A, Werner S (2010) A 2-year follow-up of rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon or hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective randomised outcome study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:805–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kamath GV, Murphy T, Creighton RA, Viradia N, Taft TN, Spang JT (2014) Anterior cruciate ligament injury, return to play, and reinjury in the elite collegiate athlete: analysis of an NCAA Division I cohort. Am J Sports Med 42:1638–1643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kamien PM, Hydrick JM, Replogle WH, Go LT, Barrett GR (2013) Age, graft size, and tegner activity level as predictors of failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Am J Sports Med 41:1808–1812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Karlsson J, Kartus J, Magnusson L, Larsson J, Brandsson S, Eriksson BI (1999) Subacute versus delayed reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in the competitive athlete. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:146–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kvist J, Ek A, Sporrstedt K, Good L (2005) Fear of re-injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:393–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Langford JL, Webster KE, Feller JA (2009) A prospective longitudinal study to assess psychological changes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Br J Sports Med 43:377–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Laxdal G, Sernert N, Ejerhed L, Karlsson J, Kartus JT (2007) A prospective comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in male patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:115–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S, Iacono F, Pia Neri M, Petitto A (1995) Early versus late reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture: results after five years of followup. Am J Sports Med 23:690–693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mascarenhas R, Tranovich MJ, Kropf EJ, Fu FH, Harner CD (2012) Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the young athlete: a retrospective matched analysis with 2–10 year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1520–1527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morgan MD, Salmon LJ, Waller A, Roe JP, Pinczewski LA (2016) Fifteen-year survival of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged 18 years and younger. Am J Sports Med 44:384–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Natri A, Järvinen M, Latvala K, Kannus P (1996) Isokinetic muscle performance after anterior cruciate ligament surgery: long-term results and outcome predicting factors after primary surgery and late-phase reconstruction. Int J Sports Med 17:223–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nwachukwu BU, Voleti PB, Berkanish P, Chang B, Cohn MR, Williams RJ III et al (2017) Return to play and patient satisfaction after ACL reconstruction: study with minimum 2-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 99:720–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sandon A, Werner S, Forssblad M (2015) Factors associated with returning to football after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2514–2521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sgaglione NA, Del Pizzo W, Fox JM, Friedman MJ (1993) Arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the pes anserine tendons comparison of results in acute and chronic ligament deficiency. Am J Sports Med 21:249–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shelbourne KD, Gray T (2000) Results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on meniscus and articular cartilage status at the time of surgery. Five- to fifteen-year evaluations. Am J Sports Med 28:446–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Takeda T, Matsumoto H, Fujikawa K (1997) Influence of secondary damage to menisci and articular cartilage on return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sci 2:215–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tambe AD, Godsiff SP, Mulay S, Joshi M (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: does delay in index surgery affect outcome in recreational athletes. Int Orthop 30:104–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Van Ginckel A, Verdonk P, Victor J, Witvrouw E (2013) Cartilage status in relation to return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 41:550–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Webster KE, Feller JA, Leigh WB, Richmond AK (2014) Younger patients are at increased risk for graft rupture and contralateral injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 42:641–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Webster KE, Feller JA, Whitehead TS, Myer GD, Merory PB (2017) Return to sport in the younger patient with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 5:2325967117703399

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zaffagnini S, Grassi A, Muccioli GM, Tsapralis K, Ricci M, Bragonzoni L et al (2014) Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in professional soccer players. Knee 21:731–735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There was no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil Kapoor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Ethical approval

This study was performed according to ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, R., Kapoor, A., soni, A. et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone–patellar tendon–bone graft is associated with higher and earlier return to sports as compared to hamstring tendon graft . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28, 3659–3665 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06074-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06074-6

Keywords

Navigation