Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the effect of using intraoperative fluoroscopy on femoral and tibial tunnel positioning variability in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Methods
A total of 80 consecutive patients with single-bundle ACL reconstruction between 2014 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 40 underwent ACL reconstruction without fluoroscopy (non-fluoroscopy group) and 40 underwent fluoroscopy-assisted ACL reconstruction (fluoroscopy group). Femoral and tibial tunnel locations were evaluated using a standardized grid system with three-dimensional computed tomography images. Femoral and tibial tunnel location variability was compared between the groups.
Results
The operation time was longer in the fluoroscopy group than in the non-fluoroscopy group (61.3 ± 5.2 min vs. 55.5 ± 4.5 min, p < 0.001). In the fluoroscopy group, a guide pin was repositioned in 16 (40%) cases on the femoral side and 2 (5%) cases on the tibial side. No significant difference in the femoral tunnel location was observed between the fluoroscopy and non-fluoroscopy groups (anterior–posterior plane, 29.0% ± 3.2% vs. 30.0% ± 6.1%; proximal–distal plane, 30.8% ± 4.8% vs. 29.4% ± 8.3%; all parameters, n.s.); variability was significantly lower in the fluoroscopy group (p < 0.001 for both anterior–posterior and proximal–distal planes). No significant difference in the tibial tunnel location and variability was observed between the fluoroscopy and non-fluoroscopy groups (medial–lateral plane, 45.8% ± 2.0% vs. 46.6% ± 2.4%; anterior–posterior plane, 31.2% ± 4.0% vs. 31.0% ± 5.4%) (all parameters, n.s.).
Conclusions
Tunnel positioning with fluoroscopic assistance is feasible and effective in achieving consistency in femoral tunnel placement despite a slightly longer operation time. Intraoperative fluoroscopy can be helpful in cases wherein identifying anatomical landmarks on arthroscopy was difficult or for surgeons with less experience who performed ACL reconstruction.
Level of evidence
IV.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00167-019-05791-x/MediaObjects/167_2019_5791_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00167-019-05791-x/MediaObjects/167_2019_5791_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00167-019-05791-x/MediaObjects/167_2019_5791_Fig3_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00167-019-05791-x/MediaObjects/167_2019_5791_Fig4_HTML.jpg)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn JH, Jeong HJ, Ko CS, Ko TS, Kim JH (2013) Three-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography evaluation of tunnel location during single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnel-independent techniques. Clin Orthop Surg 5(1):26–35
Alentorn-Geli E, Lajara F, Samitier G, Cugat R (2010) The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(8):1013–1037
Azboy I, Demirtas A, Gem M, Kiran S, Alemdar C, Bulut M (2014) A comparison of the anteromedial and transtibial drilling technique in ACL reconstruction after a short-term follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(7):963–969
Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 10(1):14–21 (discussion 21-12)
Bin SI (2017) Have evolving surgical methods improved clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Knee Surg Relat Res 29(1):1–2
Bird JH, Carmont MR, Dhillon M, Smith N, Brown C, Thompson P, Spalding T (2011) Validation of a new technique to determine midbundle femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis. Arthroscopy 27(9):1259–1267
Dhawan A, Gallo RA, Lynch SA (2016) Anatomic tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24(7):443–454
Hussein M, van Eck CF, Cretnik A, Dinevski D, Fu FH (2012) Prospective randomized clinical evaluation of conventional single-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 281 cases with 3- to 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 40(3):512–520
Inderhaug E, Larsen A, Waaler PA, Strand T, Harlem T, Solheim E (2017) The effect of intraoperative fluoroscopy on the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement in single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(4):1211–1218
Iwahashi T, Shino K, Nakata K, Otsubo H, Suzuki T, Amano H, Nakamura N (2010) Direct anterior cruciate ligament insertion to the femur assessed by histology and 3-dimensional volume-rendered computed tomography. Arthroscopy 26(9 Suppl):S13–S20
Kato Y, Ingham SJ, Kramer S, Smolinski P, Saito A, Fu FH (2010) Effect of tunnel position for anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction on knee biomechanics in a porcine model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(1):2–10
Kim YK, Yoo JD, Kim SW, Park SH, Cho JH, Lim HM (2018) Intraoperative graft isometry in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Relat Res 30(2):115–120
Kim YM, Joo YB, Lee KY, Hwang SJ (2018) Femoral footprint for anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study. Knee Surg Relat Res 30(2):128–132
Marchant MH Jr, Willimon SC, Vinson E, Pietrobon R, Garrett WE, Higgins LD (2010) Comparison of plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(8):1059–1064
McConkey MO, Amendola A, Ramme AJ, Dunn WR, Flanigan DC, Britton CL, Group MK, Wolf BR, Spindler KP, Carey JL, Cox CL, Kaeding CC, Wright RW, Matava MJ, Brophy RH, Smith MV, Mccarty EC, Vida AF, Wolcott M, Marx RG, Parker RD, Andrish JF, Jones MH (2012) Arthroscopic agreement among surgeons on anterior cruciate ligament tunnel placement. Am J Sports Med 40(12):2737–2746
Moloney G, Araujo P, Rabuck S, Carey R, Rincon G, Zhang X, Harner C (2013) Use of a fluoroscopic overlay to assist arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 41(8):1794–1800
Parkinson B, Robb C, Thomas M, Thompson P, Spalding T (2017) Factors that predict failure in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 45(7):1529–1536
Piefer JW, Pflugner TR, Hwang MD, Lubowitz JH (2012) Anterior cruciate ligament femoral footprint anatomy: systematic review of the 21st century literature. Arthroscopy 28(6):872–881
Riboh JC, Hasselblad V, Godin JA, Mather RC 3rd (2013) Transtibial versus independent drilling techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Am J Sports Med 41(11):2693–2702
Rothrauff BB, Jorge A, de Sa D, Kay J, Fu FH, Musahl V (2019) Anatomic ACL reconstruction reduces risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis: a systematic review with minimum 10-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05665-2
Siebold R, Schuhmacher P, Fernandez F, Smigielski R, Fink C, Brehmer A, Kirsch J (2015) Flat midsubstance of the anterior cruciate ligament with tibial "C"-shaped insertion site. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(11):3136–3142
Smigielski R, Zdanowicz U, Drwiega M, Ciszek B, Ciszkowska-Lyson B, Siebold R (2015) Ribbon like appearance of the midsubstance fibres of the anterior cruciate ligament close to its femoral insertion site: a cadaveric study including 111 knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(11):3143–3150
Sven S, Maurice B, Hoeher J, Marc B (2015) Variability of tunnel positioning in fluoroscopic-assisted ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(8):2269–2277
Tachibana Y, Shino K, Mae T, Iuchi R, Take Y, Nakagawa S (2019) Anatomical rectangular tunnels identified with the arthroscopic landmarks result in excellent outcomes in ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(8):2680–2690
Wolf BR, Ramme AJ, Wright RW, Brophy RH, McCarty EC, Vidal AR, Parker RD, Andrish JT, Amendola A, Group MK (2013) Variability in ACL tunnel placement: observational clinical study of surgeon ACL tunnel variability. Am J Sports Med 41(6):1265–1273
Funding
No funding was received for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Formal consent was not required for the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This work was performed at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seo, SS., Kim, CW., Lee, CR. et al. Intraoperative fluoroscopy reduces the variability in femoral tunnel placement during single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28, 629–636 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05791-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05791-x