Skip to main content
Log in

Femoral joint line restoration is a major determinant of postoperative range of motion in revision total knee arthroplasty

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to comprehensively analyze the effects of femoral or tibial joint line elevation and patella height change on the clinical results after revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) and to determine which one is the significant factor that should be restored.

Methods

One hundred and sixty-six RTKA cases (144 patients) with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic, operative, and clinical data were collected. Tibial and femoral joint line elevations were measured based on the distance from the tibial tubercle and from the adductor tubercle to the distal end of the femoral component, respectively. The patellar position was evaluated using the Insall-Salvati ratio and Blackburne-Peel index. The effects of clinical and radiological variables on the changes of range of motion (ROM) and clinical scores after RTKA were analyzed.

Results

Fourteen knees (8.4%) showed a femoral joint line elevation of more than 5 mm, and 79 knees (47.6%) showed a tibial joint line elevation of more than 5 mm. Patella baja after RTKA was observed in 33 knees (19.9%), and pseudo-patella baja after RTKA was observed in 90 knees (54.2%). The linear mixed model revealed that the femoral joint line position was the only significant factor that affected the change of ROM after RTKA. No statistically significant correlation was observed between variables and postoperative clinical scores.

Conclusions

Restoration of femoral joint line was the significant factor that increased postoperative ROM of the knee after RTKA. In complicated revision situations, surgeons should give priority to the restoration of distal femoral joint line to increase postoperative ROM.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Babazadeh S, Dowsey MM, Swan JD, Stoney JD, Choong PF (2011) Joint line position correlates with function after primary total knee replacement: a randomised controlled trial comparing conventional and computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93:1223–1231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Behrend H, Graulich T, Gerlach R, Spross C, Ladurner A (2018) Blackburne–Peel ratio predicts patients’ outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5016-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellemans J (2004) Restoring the joint line in revision TKA: does it matter? Knee 11:3–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bieger R, Huch K, Kocak S, Jung S, Reichel H, Kappe T (2014) The influence of joint line restoration on the results of revision total knee arthroplasty: comparison between distance and ratio-methods. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:537–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen AF, Tetreault MW, Levicoff EA, Fedorka CJ, Rothenberg AC, Klatt BA (2014) Increased incidence of patella baja after total knee arthroplasty revision for infection. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 43:562–566

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chonko DJ, Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR (2004) Patella baja and total knee arthroplasty (TKA): etiology, diagnosis, and management. Surg Technol Int 12:231–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (1999) Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 48:167–175

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Figgie HE, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS, Gordon NH (1986) The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 68:1035–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grelsamer RP (2002) Patella baja after total knee arthroplasty: is it really patella baja? J Arthroplasty 17:66–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hofmann AA, Kurtin SM, Lyons S, Tanner AM, Bolognesi MP (2006) Clinical and radiographic analysis of accurate restoration of the joint line in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:1154–1162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Iacono F, Lo Presti M, Bruni D, Raspugli GF, Bignozzi S, Sharma B, Marcacci M (2013) The adductor tubercle: a reliable landmark for analysing the level of the femorotibial joint line. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2725–2729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Insall J, Salvati E (1971) Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology 101:101–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kazemi SM, Daftari Besheli L, Eajazi A, Miniator Sajadi MR, Okhovatpoor MA, Farhang Zanganeh R, Minaei R (2011) Pseudo-patella baja after total knee arthroplasty. Med Sci Monit 17:CR292–C296

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Konig C, Sharenkov A, Matziolis G, Taylor WR, Perka C, Duda GN, Heller MO (2010) Joint line elevation in revision TKA leads to increased patellofemoral contact forces. J Orthop Res 28:1–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koshino T, Ejima M, Okamoto R, Morii T (1990) Gradual low riding of the patella during postoperative course after total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty 5:323–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Laskin RS (2002) Joint line position restoration during revision total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:169–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin JW, Whiteside LA (1990) The influence of joint line position on knee stability after condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 259:146–156

    Google Scholar 

  18. Noyes FR, Wojtys EM, Marshall MT (1991) The early diagnosis and treatment of developmental patella infera syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 265:241–252

    Google Scholar 

  19. Partington PF, Sawhney J, Rorabeck CH, Barrack RL, Moore J (1999) Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Paulos LE, Wnorowski DC, Greenwald AE (1994) Infrapatellar contracture syndrome. diagnosis, treatment, and long-term followup. Am J Sports Med 22:440–449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Porteous AJ, Hassaballa MA, Newman JH (2008) Does the joint line matter in revision total knee replacement? J Bone Jt Surg Br 90:879–884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rand JA (1998) Modular augments in revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 29:347–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sato T, Koga Y, Sobue T, Omori G, Tanabe Y, Sakamoto M (2007) Quantitative 3-dimensional analysis of preoperative and postoperative joint lines in total knee arthroplasty: a new concept for evaluation of component alignment. J Arthroplasty 22:560–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Selvarajah E, Hooper G (2009) Restoration of the joint line in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24:1099–1102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Singerman R, Davy DT, Goldberg VM (1994) Effects of patella alta and patella infera on patellofemoral contact forces. J Biomech 27:1059–1065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van Lieshout WAM, Valkering KP, Koenraadt KLM, van Etten-Jamaludin FS, Kerkhoffs G, van Geenen RCI (2018) The negative effect of joint line elevation after total knee arthroplasty on outcome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5099-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wyss TF, Schuster AJ, Munger P, Pfluger D, Wehrli U (2006) Does total knee joint replacement with the soft tissue balancing surgical technique maintain the natural joint line? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:480–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoshii I, Whiteside LA, White SE, Milliano MT (1991) Influence of prosthetic joint line position on knee kinematics and patellar position. J Arthroplasty 6:169–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HI18C2396).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myung Chul Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors certify that they have no commercial associations that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with this article.

Ethical approval

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (Protocol No. H-1808-071-965).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, HS., Yu, C.H., Shin, N. et al. Femoral joint line restoration is a major determinant of postoperative range of motion in revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 2090–2095 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05361-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05361-1

Keywords

Navigation