Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical and anatomic results of rotator cuff repair at 10 years depend on tear type

  • Shoulder
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Although good short-term and mid-term outcomes are reported for rotator cuff repair, few studies have investigated long-term outcome with clinical and MRI evaluation. The hypothesis was that 10 years following repair of rotator cuff tear, the clinical and anatomic results depend on the extension of the tear.

Methods

The records of all 965 patients who underwent repair of rotator cuff tears in 2003 were retrieved. The patients were reviewed in 2014 for evaluation at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. A total of 511 patients were evaluated clinically, of whom 397 were also evaluated using MRI. There were 289 isolated supraspinatus tears (SS), 94 tears with posterior extension (P), 92 with anterior extension (A) and 36 with anteroposterior (AP) extension.

Results

The Constant score had significantly improved from 53.8 ± 14.7 preoperatively to 77.7 ± 12.1 (P < 0.0001) at 10 years, with no significant difference between the four groups. The rate of retear (Sugaya IV, V) was lower in the SS group (19%) and higher in the P (32%) and AP groups (31%). At review, infraspinatus fatty degeneration was significantly greater (Fuchs > 2) in the P (P < 0.001) and AP (P < 0.001) groups and subscapularis fatty degeneration was significantly greater (Fuchs > 2) in the A (P < 0.001) and AP (P < 0.001) groups. The rate of osteoarthritis (Samilson > 2) was significantly higher at 11% (P = 0.001) in the A group. The failure rate was significantly lower (P = 0.044) in the SS group (25%) than the massive rotator cuff tear groups (A, P and AP groups) (35%). Complications occurred in 51 shoulders (10%) and repeat surgery was required in 62 shoulders (12%), with no difference between the four groups.

Conclusions

The long follow-up period of this study, large series of patients and MRI evaluation of tendon repair allowed us to demonstrate that 10 years following rotator cuff tear repair, between 68 and 81% of tendons had healed. These findings are of value in predicting response to surgical treatment. Tears with posterior extension had a higher risk of retear. However, surgical repair appeared to give a good functional outcome whatever the type of tear, despite the overall rate of complications and repeat surgery.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A:

Anterior extension

AP:

Anteroposterior extension

P:

Posterior extension

SS:

Supraspinatus

References

  1. Adamson GJ, Tibone JE (1993) Ten-year assessment of primary rotator cuff repairs. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2(2):57–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell S, Lim YJ, Coghlan J (2013) Long-term longitudinal follow-up of mini-open rotator cuff repair. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95(2):151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bey MJ, Ramsey ML, Soslowsky LJ (2002) Intratendinous strain fields of the supraspinatus tendon: effect of a surgically created articular-surface rotator cuff tear. J Shoulder Elb Surg 11(6):562–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bey MJ, Song HK, Wehrli FW, Soslowsky LJ (2002) Intratendinous strain fields of the intact supraspinatus tendon: the effect of glenohumeral joint position and tendon region. J Orthop Res 20(4):869–874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ, Carles M, Hatzidakis AM, Krishnan SG (2005) Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Jt Surg Am 87(6):1229–1240

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cofield RH, Parvizi J, Hoffmeyer PJ, Lanzer WL, Ilstrup DM, Rowland CM (2001) Surgical repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. A prospective long-term study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 83(1):71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Collin P, Kempf JF, Molé D, Meyer N, Agout C, Saffarini M, Godeneche A, Société Française de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique (SoFCOT) (2017) Ten-year multicenter clinical and MRI evaluation of isolated supraspinatus repairs. J Bone Jt Surg Am 99:1355–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Gerber C (1999) Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elb Surg 8(6):599–605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Galatz LM, Griggs S, Cameron BD, Iannotti JP (2001) Prospective longitudinal analysis of postoperative shoulder function : a ten-year follow-up study of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Bone Jt Surg Am 83(7):1052–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Genuario JW, Donegan RP, Hamman D, Bell JE, Boublik M, Schlegel T et al (2012) The cost-effectiveness of single-row compared with double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94(15):1369–1377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J (2000) The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Jt Surg Am 82(4):505–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilbart MK, Gerber C (2007) Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16(6):717–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res (304):78–83

  15. Hamada K, Yamanaka K, Uchiyama Y, Mikasa T, Mikasa M (2011) A radiographic classification of massive rotator cuff tear arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(9):2452–2460

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Keener JD, Wei AS, Kim HM, Steger-May K, Yamaguchi K (2009) Proximal humeral migration in shoulders with symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91(6):1405–1413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim HM, Dahiya N, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Stobbs G, Steger-May K et al (2010) Location and initiation of degenerative rotator cuff tears: an analysis of three hundred and sixty shoulders. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92(5):1088–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kluger R, Bock P, Mittlböck M, Krampla W, Engel A (2011) Long-term survivorship of rotator cuff repairs using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Am J Sports Med 39(10):2071–2081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kukkonen J, Joukainen A, Lehtinen J, Mattila KT, Tuominen EK, Kauko T et al (2015) Treatment of nontraumatic rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial with two years of clinical and imaging follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97(21):1729–1737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mather RC, Koenig L, Acevedo D, Dall TM, Gallo P, Romeo A et al (2013) The societal and economic value of rotator cuff repair. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95(22):1993–2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McCormick F, Gupta A, Bruce B, Harris J, Abrams G, Wilson H et al (2014) Single-row, double-row, and transosseous equivalent techniques for isolated supraspinatus tendon tears with minimal atrophy: a retrospective comparative outcome and radiographic analysis at minimum 2-year followup. Int J Shoulder Surg 8(1):15–20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Moosmayer S, Tariq R, Stiris MG, Smith HJ (2010) MRI of symptomatic and asymptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears. A comparison of findings in 100 subjects. Acta Orthop 81(3):361–366

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Nich C, Dhiaf N, Di Schino M, Augereau B (2014) Does partial tear repair of adjacent tendons improve the outcome of supraspinatus tendon full-thickness tear reinsertion? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100(7):721–726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ranebo MC, Björnsson Hallgren HC, Norlin R, Adolfsson LE (2017) Clinical and structural outcome 22 years after acromioplasty without tendon repair in patients with subacromial pain and cuff tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26:1262–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reilly P, Amis AA, Wallace AL, Emery RJ (2003) Supraspinatus tears: propagation and strain alteration. J Shoulder Elb Surg 12(2):134–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Reilly P, Amis AA, Wallace AL, Emery RJ (2003) Mechanical factors in the initiation and propagation of tears of the rotator cuff. Quantification of strains of the supraspinatus tendon in vitro. J Bone Jt Surg Br 85(4):594–599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Samilson RL, Prieto V (1983) Dislocation arthropathy of the shoulder. J Bone Jt Surg Am 65(4):456–460

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Saraswat MK, Styles-Tripp F, Beaupre LA, Luciak-Corea C, Otto D, Lalani A et al (2015) Functional outcomes and health-related quality of life after surgical repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears using a mini-open technique: a concise 10-year follow-up of a previous report. Am J Sports Med 43(11):2794–2799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Seidler A, Bolm-Audorff U, Petereit-Haack G, Ball E, Klupp M, Krauss N et al (2011) Work-related lesions of the supraspinatus tendon: a case-control study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 84(4):425–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J (2007) Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. A prospective outcome study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89(5):953–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vastamäki M, Lohman M, Borgmästars N (2013) Rotator cuff integrity correlates with clinical and functional results at a minimum 16 years after open repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(2):554–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Voigt C, Bosse C, Vosshenrich R, Schulz AP, Lill H (2010) Arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair with suture-bridging technique: functional outcome and magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med 38(5):983–991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zumstein MA, Jost B, Hempel J, Hodler J, Gerber C (2008) The clinical and structural long-term results of open repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90(11):2423–2431

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Bernard Augereau, PhD, Pascal Boileau, PhD, Michel Colmar, MD, Pierre-Henri Flurin, MD, Christian Gerber, PhD, Philippe Hardy, PhD, Laurent Lafosse, MD, Pierre Mansat, PhD, Nicolas Meyer, PhD, Daniel Molé, PhD, Christophe Nich, PhD, Laurent Nové-Josserand, MD, Hervé Thomazeau, PhD, Philippe Valenti, MD, and Gilles Walch, MD, for their participation in this study. Funding was provided by SoFCOT (Société Française de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Agout.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

The Ethical committee of the Medical university of Strasbourg gave a favorable opinion on your request about project of clinical research: Ten-year multi-center clinical and MRI evaluation of isolated supraspinatus repairs (No: IDR 2013-A01788-37).

Informed consent

Patients were informed, and they consented to conduct the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agout, C., Berhouet, J., Bouju, Y. et al. Clinical and anatomic results of rotator cuff repair at 10 years depend on tear type. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26, 2490–2497 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4854-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4854-1

Keywords

Navigation