Skip to main content
Log in

Two-dimensional planning can result in internal rotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The first purpose of this study was to compare the reproducibility of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) measurements for preoperative planning of the femoral side in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The second purpose was to evaluate the factors affecting the differences between the 2D and 3D measurements.

Methods

Two-dimensional and 3D measurements for preoperative planning of the femoral side in TKA were evaluated in 75 varus knees with osteoarthritis. The femoral valgus angle, defined as the angle between the mechanical and anatomical axes of the femur, and the clinical rotation angle and surgical rotation angle, defined by the angles between the posterior condylar line and the clinical or surgical transepicondylar axes, respectively, were analysed using 2D (radiographs and axial CT slices) and 3D (3D bone models reconstructed from CT images) measurements.

Results

For all variables, 3D measurements were more reliable and reproducible than 2D measurements. The medians and ranges of the clinical rotation angle and surgical rotation angle were 6.6° (−1.7° to 12.1°) and 2.3° (−2.5° to 8.6°) in 2D, and 7.1° (2.7° to 11.4°) and 3.0° (−2.0° to 7.5°) in 3D. Varus/valgus alteration of the CT scanning direction relative to the mechanical axis affected the difference in clinical rotation angles between 2D and 3D measurements.

Conclusion

Significantly, smaller values of the clinical rotation angle and surgical rotation angle were obtained by 2D compared to 3D measurements, which could result in internal rotation of the femoral component even if the surgeon performs the bone cutting precisely. Regarding clinical relevance, first, this study confirmed the reliability of 3D measurements. Second, it underscored the risk of internal rotation of the femoral component when using 2D measurement, even with precise bone cutting technique. These results will help surgeons avoid malpositioning of the femoral component if 2D measurements are used for preoperative planning in TKA.

Level of evidence

Prospective comparative study, Level Ш.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:144–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhattee G, Moonot P, Govindaswamy R, Pope A, Fiddian N, Harvey A (2014) Does malrotation of components correlate with patient dissatisfaction following secondary patellar resurfacing? Knee 21:247–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM (2004) Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:818–823

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Conn KS, Clarke MT, Hallett JP (2002) A simple guide to determine the magnification of radiographs and to improve the accuracy of preoperative templating. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:269–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fitzpatrick C, FitzPatrick D, Auger D, Lee J (2007) A tibial-based coordinate system for three-dimensional data. Knee 14:133–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Amsler F, Iranpour F, Friederich NF, Cobb JP (2011) The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:629–633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MA (2000) Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:1189–1195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Park SD (2014) The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop 38:379–385

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lonner JH, Laird MT, Stuchin SA (1996) Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:102–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Mawatari T, Tokunaga M, Nabeyama R, Iwamoto Y (2004) Anatomical analysis of the femoral condyle in normal and osteoarthritic knees. J Orthop Res 22:104–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mizu-uchi H, Colwell CW, Matsuda S, Flores-Hernandez C, Iwamoto Y, D’Lima DD (2011) Effect of total knee arthroplasty implant position on flexion angle before implant-bone impingement. J Arthroplasty 26:721–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mizu-uchi H, Matsuda S, Miura H, Okazaki K, Akasaki Y, Iwamoto Y (2008) The evaluation of post-operative alignment in total knee replacement using a CT-based navigation system. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1025–1031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mizu-Uchi H, Matsuda S, Miura H, Higaki H, Okazaki K, Iwamoto Y (2009) Three-dimensional analysis of computed tomography-based navigation system for total knee arthroplasty: the accuracy of computed tomography-based navigation system. J Arthroplasty 24:1103–1110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:745–749

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ (2010) Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2143–2149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ritter MA, Lutgring JD, Davis KE, Berend ME, Pierson JL, Meneghini RM (2007) The role of flexion contracture on outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:1092–1096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodricks DJ, Patil S, Pulido P, Colwell CW (2007) Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty. Fourteen to seventeen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:89–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schroer WC, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Barnes CL, Bolognesi MP, Berend ME, Nunley RM (2013) Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011. J Arthroplasty 28:116–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Swanson KE, Stocks GW, Warren PD, Hazel MR, Janssen HF (2000) Does axial limb rotation affect the alignment measurements in deformed limbs? Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:246–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tashiro Y, Uemura M, Matsuda S, Okazaki K, Kawahara S, Hashizume M, Iwamoto Y (2012) Articular cartilage of the posterior condyle can affect rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1463–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vessely MB, Whaley AL, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, Berry DJ (2006) The Chitranjan Ranawat award: long-term survivorship and failure modes of 1000 cemented condylar total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:28–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Victor J, Ghijselings S, Tajdar F, Damme G, Deprez P, Arnout N, Straeten C (2014) Total knee arthroplasty at 15–17 years: does implant design affect outcome? Int Orthop 38:235–241

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Victor J, Van Doninck D, Labey L, Innocenti B, Parizel PM, Bellemans J (2009) How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee? Knee 16:358–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vuorenmaa M, Ylinen J, Piitulainen K, Salo P, Kautiainen H, Pesola M, Häkkinen A (2014) Efficacy of a 12-month, monitored home exercise programme compared with normal care commencing 2 months after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 46:166–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wai Hung CL, Wai Pan Y, Kwong Yuen C, Hon Bong L, Lei Sha LW, Ho Man SW (2009) Interobserver and intraobserver error in distal femur transepicondylar axis measurement with computed tomography. J Arthroplasty 2009(24):96–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A (1998) Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 17:101–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or in directly to the subject of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideki Mizu-uchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okamoto, S., Mizu-uchi, H., Okazaki, K. et al. Two-dimensional planning can result in internal rotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 229–235 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3370-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3370-1

Keywords

Navigation