Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Arthroscopic image distortion—part I: the effect of lens and viewing angles in a 2-dimensional in vitro model

  • Experimental Study
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Arthroscopic images are subject to distortion, which may increase when using arthroscope lenses with greater reflecting angles and/or viewing structures at oblique angles. The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude of image distortion experienced when using arthroscopes with different lens angles and when the line-of-sight (i.e., viewing angle) is not directly perpendicular to the target.

Methods

A dot calibration target was captured through 0°, 30°, and 70° arthroscopes from straight (i.e., directly perpendicular) and 30° oblique viewing angles. Distortions in horizontal and vertical distances in deep (located at 87.5 % length of arthroscopic image diameter) or shallow (12.5 % diameter length) regions were calculated, from which a deformity ratio (horizontal/vertical distance) was determined.

Results

From the straight viewing angle (0°), both horizontal and vertical distances were artificially reduced (i.e., <100 % magnification) in the shallow and deep regions. The deformity ratio was ~100 % in the central region, declining to ~80 % peripherally. From the oblique viewing angle (30°), magnification was below 100 % in the deep area but exceeded 100 % in the shallow area, with increasing distortion associated with increasing lens angle (0° < 30° < 70°). For all lens angles, the deformity ratio was ~50 % in the deep area but neared 100 % in the shallow region.

Conclusions

Arthroscopic image distortion in peripheral regions should be considered when using angled-lens arthroscopes, especially when the viewing angle is not straight. As viewing the femoral ACL footprint through the anterolateral portal involves using an oblique viewing angle, visualization through the anteromedial portal is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Giron F, Simeone AJV, Zaccherotti G (1997) Arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the central third patellar tendon. A 5-8-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:138–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmed M, Farag A (2005) Nonmetric calibration of camera lens distortion: differential methods and robust estimation. IEEE Trans Image Process 14(8):1215–1230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Asari KV, Kumar S, Radhakrishnan D (1999) Technique of distortion correction in endoscopic images using a polynomial expansion. Med Biol Eng Comput 37:8–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bedi A, Altchek DW (2009) The “footprint” anterior cruciate ligament technique an anatomic approach to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 25(10):1128–1138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Colombet P, Robinson J, Christel P, Franceschi JP, Djian P, Bellier G, Sbihi A (2006) Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachments for anatomic reconstruction: a cadaveric dissection and radiographic study. Arthroscopy 22(9):984–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis MH, Khotanzad A, Flamig DP, Harms SE (1997) A physics-based coordinate transformation for 3-D image matching. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16(3):317–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Shen W, Fu FH (2007) Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23(11):1218–1225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Helferty JP, Zhang C, McLennen G, Higgins WE (2001) Videoendoscopic distortion correction and its application to virtual guidance of endoscopy. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20(7):605–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoshino Y, Nagamune K, Yagi M, Araki D, Nishimoto K, Kubo S, Minoru D, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2009) The effect of intra-operative knee flexion angle on determination of graft location in the anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1052–1060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hutchinson MR, Ash SA (2003) Resident’s ridge: assessing the cortical thickness of the lateral wall and rood of the intercondylar notch. Arthroscopy 19(9):931–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kallemeyn NA, Grosland NM, Magnotta VA, Martin JA, Pedersen DR (2007) Arthroscopic lens distortion correction applied to dynamic cartilage loading. Iowa Ortho J 27:52–57

    Google Scholar 

  12. Khalfayan EE, Sharkey PF, Alexander AH, Bruckner JD, Bynum EB (1996) The relationship between tunnel placement and clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 24:335–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Purnell ML, Larson AI, Clancy W (2008) Anterior cruciate ligament insertions on the tibia and femur and their relationships to critical landmarks using high-resolution volume-rendering computed tomography. Am J Sports Med 36:2083–2090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shahidi R, Bax MR, Maurer CR Jr, Johnson JA, Wilkinson EP, Wang B, West JB, Citardi MJ, Manwaring KH, Khadem R (2002) Implementation, calibration and accuracy testing of an image-enhanced endoscopy system. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21(12):1524–1535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Siebolt R, Ellert T, Metz S, Metz J (2008) Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for double-bundle bone tunnel placement—a cadaver study. Arthroscopy 24(5):585–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sommer C, Friederich NF, Muller W (2000) Improperly placed anterior cruciate ligament grafts: correlation between radiological parameters and clinical results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:207–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Eck CF, Lesniak BP, Schreiber VM, Fu FH (2010) Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction flowchart. Arthroscopy 26(2):258–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Kitamura N, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H, Minami A (2004) Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy 20(10):1015–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Smith & Nephew for using the arthroscopy system and their endoscopic research and development laboratory.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuichi Hoshino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoshino, Y., Rothrauff, B.B., Hensler, D. et al. Arthroscopic image distortion—part I: the effect of lens and viewing angles in a 2-dimensional in vitro model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 2065–2071 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3336-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3336-3

Keywords

Navigation