Abstract
Although many design for manufacturing tools and methods have been developed, it is unclear if engineers at startups widely use these design support techniques. We interviewed twelve engineers employed at startups to better identify common practices related to design for manufacturing. Specifically, we sought to learn the design for manufacturing strategies and tools used, and the timing of considering manufacturing constraints—such as process cost and geometry restrictions—in startups’ new product development processes. Interviews were analyzed using an inductive coding approach. All interviewees viewed design for manufacturing as being necessary for a successful product launch, but the implementation of considering manufacturing constraints varied. Interviewees mainly learned of the importance of design for manufacturing through negative personal design experiences where they did not emphasize the consideration of manufacturing constraints, a process which was described as “earning scars.” Formal education was viewed by interviewees as having limited practical utility, and startups’ staffing and funding constraints contributed to informal new product development processes and design practices. We identified ten emergent informal design for manufacturing strategies employed at startups, with most strategies relying heavily on consulting external manufacturing experts. We noted only a limited use of design for manufacturing tools, such as manufacturing simulation software and cost modeling. Insights from this paper can lead to better educational practices, contribute to more contextualized advising of startups, and guide other resource-constrained design teams.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
Due to IRB protections, the interview data are not available online.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Abdelall ES, Frank MC, Stone RT (2018) A study of design fixation related to additive manufacturing. J Mech Des 140:041702. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039007
Brown T (2013) Why you should talk less and do more. In: IDEOs Des. Think. Blog. https://designthinking.ideo.com/blog/why-you-should-talk-less-and-do-more. Accessed 9 Jul 2021
CB Insights (2017) Hardware is hard—so how can consumer hardware startups succeed? https://www.cbinsights.com/research/report/hardware-startups-failure-success/. Accessed 9 Jul 2021
Chiu M-C, Okudan GE (2010) Evolution of design for x tools applicable to design stages: a literature review. Volume 6: 15th Design for Manufacturing and the Lifecycle Conference; 7th Symposium on International Design and Design Education. ASME, Montreal, pp 171–182
Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ (1995) Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new product development. J Prod Innov Manag 12:374–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1250374
Davila A, Foster G, Jia N (2010) Building sustainable high-growth startup companies: management systems as an accelerator. Calif Manage Rev 52:79–105. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2010.52.3.79
Decker R, Haltiwanger J, Jarmin R, Miranda J (2014) The role of entrepreneurship in US job creation and economic dynamism. J Econ Perspect 28:3–24. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.3.3
Deken F, Kleinsmann M, Aurisicchio M et al (2012) Tapping into past design experiences: knowledge sharing and creation during novice–expert design consultations. Res Eng Des 23:203–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-011-0123-8
de Vries H, Elliott MN, Kanouse DE, Teleki SS (2008) Using pooled kappa to summarize interrater agreement across many items. Field Methods 20:272–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08317166
Duran-Novoa R, Weigl JD, Henz M, Koh ECY (2018) Designing in young organisations: engineering change propagation in a university design project. Res Eng Des 29:489–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-018-0292-9
Eckert C, Stacey M, Earl C (2005) References to past designs. In: Studying Designers ’05. University of Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France, pp 3–19
Eggert R (2006) Design for manufacture and assembly: a survey of desired competencies. In: 2006 Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings. ASEE Conferences, Chicago, p 11.404.1–11.404.12
Ettlie JE (1995) Early manufacturing involvement in new product development. In: Proceedings for Operating Research and the Management Sciences. IEEE, Singapore, pp 104–109
Freeman J, Engel JS (2007) Models of innovation: startups and mature corporations. Calif Manage Rev 50:94–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166418
Gericke K, Kramer J, Roschuni C (2016) An exploratory study of the discovery and selection of design methods in practice. J Mech Des 138:101109. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034088
Gericke K, Eckert C, Stacey M (2017) What do we need to say about a design method? In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 7: Design Theory and Research Methodology. pp 101–110
Gericke K, Eckert C, Campean F et al (2020) Supporting designers: moving from method menagerie to method ecosystem. Des Sci. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.21
Grodal S, Anteby M, Holm AL (2021) Achieving rigor in qualitative analysis: the role of active categorization in theory building. Acad Manage Rev 46:591–612. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0482
Gupta SK, Regli WC, Das D, Nau DS (1997) Automated manufacturability analysis: a survey. Res Eng Des 9:168–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01596601
Johnsen TE (2009) Supplier involvement in new product development and innovation: taking stock and looking to the future. J Purch Supply Manag 15:187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2009.03.008
Kahn KB (ed) (2013) The PDMA handbook of new product development, 3rd ed. Wiley, Hoboken
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
La Trobe-Bateman J, Wild D (2003) Design for manufacturing: use of a spreadsheet model of manufacturability to optimize product design and development. Res Eng Des 14:107–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-003-0030-8
Madon T, Gertler P, Gadgil A (2016) Introduction. Dev Eng 1:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.deveng.2016.03.001
Marion TJ, Friar JH, Simpson TW (2012) New product development practices and early-stage firms: two in-depth case studies: npd and early-stage firms. J Prod Innov Manag 29:639–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00930.x
Marion TJ, Meyer MH (2011) Applying industrial design and cost engineering to new product development in early-stage firms. J Prod Innov Manag No No. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00839.x
Marion TJ, Eddleston KA, Friar JH, Deeds D (2015) The evolution of interorganizational relationships in emerging ventures: an ethnographic study within the new product development process. J Bus Ventur 30:167–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.003
Millward H, Lewis A (2005) Barriers to successful new product development within small manufacturing companies. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 12:379–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000510612295
Mirkouei A, Bhinge R, McCoy C et al (2016) A pedagogical module framework to improve scaffolded active learning in manufacturing engineering education. Procedia Manuf 5:1128–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.088
Nelson J, Mahan T, McComb C, Menold J (2019) The prototyping behaviors of startups: exploring the relationship between prototyping behavior and the financial success of startups. In: Volume 7: 31st International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Anaheim, California, USA, p V007T06A025
Patterson AE, Allison JT (2019) Generation and mapping of minimally-restrictive manufacturability constraints for mechanical design problems. In: American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection
Ries E (2011) The lean startup: how today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses, 1st ed. Crown Business, New York
Saldaña J (2016) The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 3rd edn. SAGE, Los Angeles
Skalak SC, Kemser H-P, Ter-Minassian N (1997) Defining a product development methodology with concurrent engineering for small manufacturing companies. J Eng Des 8:305–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544829708907968
Somerville H (2021) Silicon valley’s deal machine is cranking: ‘i’ve never seen it this frenzied.’ Wall Str. J.
Sommer SC, Loch CH, Dong J (2009) Managing complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty in startup companies: an empirical study. Organ Sci 20:118–133. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0369
Srinivasan S, Li ZF, Han YL, Camburn BA (2020) The impact of prototyping strategies on crowdfunding success. In: Volume 8: 32nd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (DTM). American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Virtual, Online, p V008T08A045
Strauss A, Corbin JM (1990) Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol 13:3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
Swink M (1999) Threats to new product manufacturability and the effects of development team integration processes. J Oper Manag 17:691–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00027-3
Thomas DR (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval 27:237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
Thornton AC, Donnelly S, Ertan B (2000) More than just robust design: why product development organizations still contend with variation and its impact on quality. Res Eng Des 12:127–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001630050028
Ullman DG (2016) The mechanical design process, Fifth edition. McGraw-Hill Education, New York
Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD, Yang MC (2020) Product design and development, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill Education, Boston
US Beureau of Labor Statistics and the title of the webpage is Research Data on Business Employment Dynamics by Age and Size. Accessed 9 Jul 2021
van Manen M (2016) Researching lived experience : human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Routledge
Wolff JA, Pett TL (2006) Small-firm performance: modeling the role of product and process improvements. J Small Bus Manag 44:268–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00167.x
Funding
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE-1752814. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethics approval
This research study was approved by UC Berkeley’s Committee for Protection of Human Subjects, ID 2018–10-11463.
Consent to participate
Participants were asked to provide verbal consent to participate in the interview study and to have the interview audio recorded. Participants were told that they could stop the interview or the audio recording at any point.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Budinoff, H.D., Kramer, J. ‘Earning your scars’: an exploratory interview study of design for manufacturing at hardware startups. Res Eng Design 33, 395–411 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-022-00396-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-022-00396-x