Abstract
Model-based feedback control of vortex shedding at low Reynolds numbers is considered. The feedback signal is provided by velocity measurements in the wake, and actuation is achieved using blowing and suction on the cylinder’s surface. Using two-dimensional direct numerical simulations and reduced-order modelling techniques, linear models of the wake are formed at Reynolds numbers between 45 and 110. These models are used to design feedback controllers using \(\mathcal {H}_\infty \) loop-shaping. Complete suppression of shedding is demonstrated up to Re \(=\) 110—both for a single-sensor arrangement and for a three-sensor arrangement. The robustness of the feedback controllers is also investigated by applying them over a range of off-design Reynolds numbers, and good robustness properties are seen. It is also observed that it becomes increasingly difficult to achieve acceptable control performance—measured in a suitable way—as Reynolds number increases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Åström, K.J., Murray, R.M.: Feedback Systems: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008)
Bagheri, S., Henningson, D.S., Hoepffner, J., Schmid, P.J.: Input–output analysis and control design applied to a linear model of spatially developing flows. Appl. Mech. Rev. 62(2), 020,803 (2009)
Berger, E.: Suppression of vortex shedding and turbulence behind oscillating cylinders. Phys. Fluids Suppl. 10, S191–S193 (1967)
Bergmann, M., Cordier, L.: Optimal control of the cylinder wake in the laminar regime by trust-region methods and POD reduced-order models. J. Comput. Phys. 227(16), 7813–7840 (2008)
Bergmann, M., Cordier, L., Brancher, J.P.: Optimal rotary control of the cylinder wake using proper orthogonal decomposition reduced-order model. Phys. Fluids 17(9), 097,101 (2005)
Camarri, S., Iollo, A.: Feedback control of the vortex-shedding instability based on sensitivity analysis. Phys. Fluids 22(9), 094,102 (2010)
Cohen, K., Siegel, S., McLaughlin, T., Gillies, E.: Feedback control of a cylinder wake low-dimensional model. AIAA J. 41(7), 1389–1391 (2003)
Ffowcs Williams, J.E., Zhao, B.C.: The active control of vortex shedding. J. Fluids Struct. 3(2), 115–122 (1989)
Forssell, U., Ljung, L.: Closed-loop identification revisited. Automatica 35(7), 1215–1241 (1999)
Fukagata, K., Kasagi, N.: Highly energy-conservative finite difference method for the cylindrical coordinate system. J. Comput. Phys. 181(2), 478–498 (2002)
Georgiou, T.T., Smith, M.C.: Feedback control and the arrow of time. Int. J. Control 83(7), 1325–1338 (2010)
Gillies, E.A.: Low-dimensional control of the circular cylinder wake. J. Fluid Mech. 371, 157–178 (1998)
Glover, K., McFarlane, D.: Robust stabilization of normalized coprime factor plant descriptions with \(\cal H_\infty \)-bounded uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 34(8), 821–830 (1989)
Graham, W.R., Peraire, J., Tang, K.Y.: Optimal control of vortex shedding using low-order models. Part II—model-based control. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 44(7), 973–990 (1999)
Gunzburger, M.D., Lee, H.C.: Feedback control of Karman vortex shedding. J. Appl. Mech. 63(3), 828–835 (1996)
Gustavsson, I., Ljung, L., Söderström, T.: Identification of processes in closed loop—identifiability and accuracy aspects. Automatica 13(1), 59–75 (1977)
He, J.W., Glowinski, R., Metcalfe, R., Nordlander, A., Periaux, J.: Active control and drag optimization for flow past a circular cylinder: I. Oscillatory cylinder rotation. J. Comput. Phys. 163(1), 83–117 (2000)
Homescu, C., Navon, I.M., Li, Z.: Suppression of vortex shedding for flow around a circular cylinder using optimal control. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 38(1), 43–69 (2002)
Illingworth, S.J., Morgans, A.S., Rowley, C.W.: Feedback control of flow resonances using balanced reduced-order models. J. Sound Vib. 330, 1567–1581 (2011)
Illingworth, S.J., Naito, H., Fukagata, K.: Active control of vortex shedding: an explanation of the gain window. Phys. Rev. E 90, 043,014 (2014)
Juang, J.N.: Applied System Identification. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1994)
Juang, J.N., Pappa, R.S.: An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 8(5), 620–627 (1985)
Keles, R.S.: Active control of transition to turbulence in the wake of a cylinder. Aircr. Des. 3(1), 1–15 (2000)
Kim, J., Bewley, T.R.: A linear systems approach to flow control. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 383–417 (2007)
Lauga, E., Bewley, T.R.: The decay of stabilizability with Reynolds number in a linear model of spatially developing flows. Proc. R. Soc. A 459(2036), 2077–2095 (2003)
Li, F., Aubry, N.: Feedback control of a flow past a cylinder via transverse motion. Phys. Fluids 15(8), 2163–2176 (2003)
Li, Z., Navon, I.M., Hussaini, M.Y., Dimet, F.X.L.: Optimal control of cylinder wakes via suction and blowing. Comput. Fluids 32(2), 149–171 (2003)
Ljung, L.: System Identification: Theory for the User, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1999)
Ma, Z., Ahuja, S., Rowley, C.W.: Reduced order models for control of fluids using the eigensystem realization algorithm. Theor. Comp. Fluid Mech. 25, 233–247 (2009)
McFarlane, D.C., Glover, K.: Robust controller design using normalized coprime factor plant descriptions. Springer, Berlin (1990)
Min, C., Choi, H.: Suboptimal feedback control of vortex shedding at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 401, 123–156 (1999)
Naito, H., Fukagata, K.: Numerical simulation of flow around a circular cylinder having porous surface. Phys. Fluids 24(11), 117,102 (2012)
Park, D.S., Ladd, D.M., Hendricks, E.W.: Feedback control of von Kármán vortex shedding behind a circular cylinder at low Reynolds numbers. Phys. Fluids 6(7), 2390–2405 (1994)
Protas, B.: Linear feedback stabilization of laminar vortex shedding based on a point vortex model. Phys. Fluids 16(12), 4473–4488 (2004)
Protas, B., Styczek, A.: Optimal rotary control of the cylinder wake in the laminar regime. Phys. Fluids 14(7), 2073–2087 (2002)
Roussopoulos, K.: Feedback control of vortex shedding at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 248(1), 267–296 (1993)
Rowley, C.W.: Model reduction for fluids, using balanced proper orthogonal decomposition. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 15(3), 997–1013 (2005)
Siegel, S., Cohen, K., McLaughlin, T.: Numerical simulations of a feedback-controlled circular cylinder wake. AIAA J. 44(6), 1266–1276 (2006)
Singh, S.N., Myatt, J.H., Addington, G.A., Banda, S., Hall, J.K.: Optimal feedback control of vortex shedding using proper orthogonal decomposition models. J. Fluids Eng. 123(3), 612–618 (2001)
Skogestad, S., Postlethwaite, I.: Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design. Wiley, New York (2005)
Son, D., Jeon, S., Choi, H.: A proportional-integral-differential control of flow over a circular cylinder. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369(1940), 1540–1555 (2011)
Tao, J.S., Huang, X.Y., Chan, W.K.: A flow visualization study on feedback control of vortex shedding from a circular cylinder. J. Fluids Struct. 10(8), 965–970 (1996)
Van den Hof, P.M.J., Schrama, R.J.P.: Identification and control—closed-loop issues. Automatica 31(12), 1751–1770 (1995)
Vinnicombe, G.: Uncertainty and feedback: \(\cal {H}_{\infty }\) loop-shaping and the \(\nu \)-gap metric. Imperial College Press, London (2000)
Weller, J., Camarri, S., Iollo, A.: Feedback control by low-order modelling of the laminar flow past a bluff body. J. Fluid Mech. 634, 405–418 (2009)
Williamson, C.H.K.: Oblique and parallel modes of vortex shedding in the wake of a circular cylinder at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 206, 579–627 (1989)
Williamson, C.H.K.: Vortex dynamics in the cylinder wake. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 28, 477–539 (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Jeff D. Eldredge.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Illingworth, S.J. Model-based control of vortex shedding at low Reynolds numbers. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 30, 429–448 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-016-0389-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-016-0389-6