Abstract
Traditional approach based on wind tunnel tests used in bridge wind-resistant design is no more efficient since long-span bridges require an iterative process involving multiple design variables and processes. To ease the design process, scholars have proposed aerodynamic shape optimization based on the Kriging surrogate model. Despite the prowess of the Kriging model, it is accurate only when using high-fidelity data (experimental or Large Eddy Simulation data) and is not suitable for noisy datasets, making this model costly and hindering its practical use. To tackle this issue, the present study proposed a polynomial surrogate combined with a genetic algorithm to determine the optimal shape of a streamlined bridge deck cross-section. First, a uniform sampling plan considering 57 different geometries was generated. Then, the polynomial surrogate was used to predict the aerodynamic coefficients and the flutter velocity based on the dataset obtained from the unsteady Reynolds-average Navier–Stokes computational fluid dynamics simulations. The accuracy of the surrogate model is evaluated using error metrics, such as the sum-squared error, R-squared, and the root mean squared error. The results obtained from the statistical metrics demonstrate that the proposed polynomial surrogate provides an accurate prediction of the force coefficients and their derivatives, as well as the critical flutter velocity. A benchmark example is used to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed model. Finally, a genetic algorithm was introduced to determine an optimal shape, and the results demonstrate that the proposed optimization framework can improve the design process remarkably.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbas T, Kavrakov I, Morgenthal G (2017) Methods for flutter stability analysis of long-span bridges: a review. Proc Inst Civ Eng Bridg Eng 170(4):271–310. https://doi.org/10.1680/jbren.15.00039
Álvarez AJ, Nieto F, Kwok KCS, Hernández S (2018) Aerodynamic performance of twin-box decks: a parametric study on gap width effects based on validated 2D URANS simulations. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 182(April):202–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.09.004
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2002) Guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations (AIAA G-077-1998), Reston, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/4.472855.001
Andersen MS, Eriksen MB, Larsen SV, Brandt A (2022) The influence of gap- and chord-widths for multi-box girders: superposition of flat plate flutter derivatives and section model tests. J Fluids Struct 109:103489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2021.103489
Argentini T, Rocchi D, Somaschini C, Spinelli U, Zanelli F, Larsen A (2022) Aeroelastic stability of a twin-box deck: comparison of different procedures to assess the effect of geometric details. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 220(May 2021):104878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104878
Bernardini E, Spence SMJ, Wei D, Kareem A (2015) Aerodynamic shape optimization of civil structures: a CFD-enabled Kriging-based approach. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 144:154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.03.011
Brusiani F, De Miranda S, Patruno L, Ubertini F, Vaona P (2013) On the evaluation of bridge deck flutter derivatives using RANS turbulence models. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 119:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.05.002
Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas CJ, Coleman H, Raad PE (2008) Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J Fluids Eng 130:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2960953
Chang YW, Hsieh CJ, Chang KW, Ringgaard M, Lin CJ (2010) Training and testing low-degree polynomial data mappings via linear SVM. J Mach Learn Res 11:1471–1490
Chen X, Kareem A (2002) Advances in modeling of aerodynamic forces on bridge decks. J Eng Mech 128:1193–1205. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2002)128:11(1193)
Chen X, Kareem A (2006) Revisiting multimode coupled bridge flutter: some new insights. J Eng Mech 132:1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:10(1115)
Chobsilprakob P, Kim K-D, Suthasupradit S, Manovachirasan A (2014) Application of indicial function for the flutter analysis of long span suspension bridge during erection. Int J Steel Struct 14:185–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-1016-2
Cid Montoya M, Hernández S, Nieto F (2018a) Shape optimization of streamlined decks of cable-stayed bridges considering aeroelastic and structural constraints. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 177:429–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.12.018
Cid Montoya M, Hernández S, Nieto F, Kareem A (2020) Aero-structural design of bridges focusing on the buffeting response: formulation, parametric studies and deck shape tailoring. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 204:104243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104243
Cid Montoya M, Nieto F, Hernández S, Fontán F, Jurado JÁ, Kareem A (2021a) Aero-structural optimization of streamlined twin-box deck bridges with short gap considering flutter. J Bridg Eng 26:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001705
Cid Montoya M, Nieto F, Hernández S, Fontán A, Jurado JA, Kareem A (2021b) Optimization of bridges with short gap streamlined twin-box decks considering structural, flutter and buffeting performance. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 208:104316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104316
Cid Montoya M, Nieto F, Hernández S, Kusano I, Álvarez AJ, Jurado JÁ (2018b) CFD-based aeroelastic characterization of streamlined bridge deck cross-sections subject to shape modifications using surrogate models. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 177:405–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.01.014
Ding F, Kareem A (2018) A multi-fidelity shape optimization via surrogate modeling for civil structures. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 178:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.04.022
Ding F, Kareem A, Wan J (2019) Aerodynamic tailoring of structures using computational fluid dynamics. Struct Eng Int 29:26–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2018.1522936
Fujino Y, Siringoringo D (2013) Vibration mechanisms and controls of long-span bridges: a review. Struct Eng Int J Int Assoc Bridg Struct Eng 23:248–268. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686613X13439149156886
Ge YJ, Tanaka H (2000) Aerodynamic flutter analysis of cable-supported bridges by multi-mode and full-mode approaches. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 86(2–3):123–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00007-6
Haque MN, Katsuchi H, Yamada H, Nishio M (2016) Investigation of edge fairing shaping effects on aerodynamic response of long-span bridge deck by unsteady RANS. Arch Civ Mech Eng 16(4):888–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2016.06.007
Han ZH, Xu CZ, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Zhang KS, Song WP (2020) Efficient aerodynamic shape optimization using variable-fidelity surrogate models and multilevel computational grids. Chin J Aeronaut 33:31–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2019.05.001
He XH, Li H, Wang HF, Fang DX, Liu MT (2017) Effects of geometrical parameters on the aerodynamic characteristics of a streamlined flat box girder. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 170:56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.08.009
He XH, Kang XM, Yan L, Flay RGJ, Ren PJ, Wu T (2021) Numerical investigation of flow structures and aerodynamic interference around stationary parallel box girders. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 215(March):104610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104610
Hua XG, Chen ZQ (2008) Full-order and multimode flutter analysis using ANSYS. Finite Elem Anal Des 44:537–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2008.01.011
Jain A, Jones NP, Scanlan RH (1996) Coupled aeroelastic and aerodynamic response analysis of long-span bridges. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 60:69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(96)00024-4
Jaouadi Z, Abbas T, Morgenthal G, Lahmer T (2020) Single and multi-objective shape optimization of streamlined bridge decks. Struct Multidisc Optim 61:1495–1514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02431-3
Jurado JA, Hernández S, Nieto F, Mosquera A (2011) Bridge aeroelasticity: Sensitivity analysis and optimum design. WIT Press, Southampton
Kareem A (2020) Emerging frontiers in wind engineering: Computing, stochastics, machine learning and beyond. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 206:104320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104320
Kashima S, Yanaka Y, Suzuki S, Mori K (2001) Monitoring the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge: first Experiences. Struct Eng Int 11:120–123. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686601780347200
Kurpati A, Azarm S, Wu J (2002) Constraint handling improvements for multiobjective genetic algorithms. Struct Multidisc Optim 23:204–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-002-0178-2
Kusano I, Cid Montoya M, Baldomir A, Nieto F, Jurado JÁ, Hernández S (2020) Reliability based design optimization for bridge girder shape and plate thicknesses of long-span suspension bridges considering aeroelastic constraint. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 202:104176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104176
Laima S, Li H (2015) Effects of gap width on flow motions around twin-box girders and vortex-induced vibrations. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 139:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.01.009
Larsen A (1993) Aerodynamic aspects of the final design of the 1624 m suspension bridge across the Great Belt. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 48(2–3):261–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90141-A
Larsen A, Wall A (2012) Shaping of bridge box girders to avoid vortex shedding response. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 104–106(3):159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.04.018
Li H, He XH, Hu L, Xu GJ (2021a) Quantification of aerodynamic forces for truss bridge-girders based on wind tunnel test and kriging surrogate model. Adv Struct Eng 24:2161–2175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433221992497
Li SP, Snaiki R, Wu T (2021b) A knowledge-enhanced deep reinforcement learning-based shape optimizer for aerodynamic mitigation of wind-sensitive structures. Comput Civ Infrastruct Eng 36:733–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12655
Loeppky JL, Sacks J, Welch WJ (2012) Choosing the sample size of a computer experiment: a practical guide. Technometrics 51(4):366–376. https://doi.org/10.1198/TECH.2009.08040
Mooneghi MA, Kargarmoakhar R (2016) Aerodynamic mitigation and shape optimization of buildings: review. J Build Eng 6:225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.01.009
Nieto F, Cid Montoya M, Hernández S, Kusano I, Casteleiro A, Álvarez AJ, Jurado JÁ, Fontán A (2020) Aerodynamic and aeroelastic responses of short gap twin-box decks: box geometry and gap distance dependent surrogate based design. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 201:104147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104147
Nieto F, Hernández S, Jurado JÁ, Mosquera A (2011) Analytical approach to sensitivity analysis of flutter speed in bridges considering variable deck mass. Adv Eng Softw 42:117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2010.12.003
Scanlan RH, Tomko JJ (1971) Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives. ASCE J Eng Mech Div 97(6):1717–1737. https://doi.org/10.1061/jmcea3.0001526
von Hooff T, Blocken B, Tominaga Y (2017) On the accuracy of CFD simulations of cross-ventilation flows for a generic isolated building: comparison of RANS, LES and experiments. Build Environ 114:148–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.019
Wilcox DC (2006) Turbulence modeling for CFD, 3rd edn. DCW Ind, Chennai
Wu T, Kareem A (2013) Bridge aerodynamics and aeroelasticity: a comparison of modeling schemes. J Fluids Struct 43:347–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.09.015
Xiao W (2019) Novel online algorithms for nonparametric correlations with application to analyze sensor data. In: 2019 IEEE international conference on big data. IEEE, Seattle-USA, pp 404–412. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData47090.2019.9006483
Xu GJ, Kareem A, Shen L (2020) Surrogate modeling with sequential updating: applications to bridge deck–wave and bridge deck–wind interactions. J Comput Civ Eng 34:04020023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000904
Yang YX, Wu T, Ge YJ, Kareem A (2015) Aerodynamic stabilization mechanism of a twin box girder with various slot widths. J Bridg Eng 20(3):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000645
Yondo R, Andrés E, Valero E (2018) A review on design of experiments and surrogate models in aircraft real-time and many-query aerodynamic analyses. Prog Aerosp Sci 96:23–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.11.003
Zalzala AMS, Fleming PJ (1997) Genetic algorithms in engineering systems. The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 52178516, 51925808). This work was supported by the Tencent Foundation or XPLORER PRIZE. The authors would like to thank Mr. Jialong Li and Mr. Jie Luo at Central South University for their contribution to the finite element model of the Great Belt Bridge. The authors are grateful for the use of resources from the High-Performance Computing Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ST: Conceptualization, methodology, software, wind tunnel tests, numerical simulation, data analysis, writing—original draft, review, editing. XH: Funding acquisition, supervision, review. LY: Funding acquisition, supervision, methodology, and review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Replication of results
All the results in this research are obtained using wind tunnel tests, ANSYS APDL, ANSYS FLUENT, and homemade MATLAB codes. The source code and research data can be available from the corresponding author with reasonable requests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Jos Josephine Voigt
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tinmitondé, S., He, X. & Yan, L. Single-objective aerodynamic optimization of a streamlined bridge deck subjected to shape modification using a polynomial emulator and genetic algorithm. Struct Multidisc Optim 65, 356 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03459-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03459-8