Skip to main content
Log in

Multiobjective optimization design for an occupant restraint system considering interval correlation

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The occupant restraint system (ORS) focuses on automobile crash safety, which can effectively reduce passenger injury. For an ORS, some design parameters are uncertainties, but even they may have correlations. It is noted that the ORS is typically characterized by various occupant injury indices, and uncertainties and their correlations will impact these indices, while most existing design problems have been formulated as a single objective optimization. To address these issues, this paper combines a multidimensional parallelepiped model with a multiobjective genetic algorithm (GA) for the vehicle ORS design. First, a multiobjective optimization model for the ORS design considering interval uncertainties and their correlations is developed to balance the design requirements for multiple objectives. Second, the established multiobjective optimization model considering parametric correlations is converted into an independent interval multiobjective optimization model in the transformed cuboid domain. Third, the interval multiobjective optimization model is converted into a deterministic multiobjective optimization model by the use of the interval order relation and interval possibility degree. Finally, the optimization problem is solved by coupling the multiobjective GA with the interval expansion method. The ORS design of a 100% frontal impact at a speed of 35 mph is exemplified for the proposed model and method, and the application example shows that the optimization results are different for different correlations. If the correlation analysis is neglected, then the optimization results may lead to a deviation of design. Thus, more conservative solutions could have been generated from the ORS design considering interval correlation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bai ZH, Lu J, Wang YL, Fei J (2014) High-dimensional objective optimization of driver side restraint system based on reduction of dimension. China Mech Eng 25(11):1556–1561

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai ZH, Chen YF, Cheng SH, Wang YL (2015) Research on the optimization of intelligent child restraint systems based on children of different ages. J Mech Eng 51(6):118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du XP (2012) Reliability-based design optimization with dependent interval variables. Int J Numer Methods Eng 91(2):218–228

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ferson S, Hajagos J, Berleant D, Zhang J, Oberkampf W (2004) Dependence in Dempster–Shafer theory and probability bounds analysis. SAND2004 Report. Sandia National Laboratories

  • Ge RH, Zhang SX, Wei SY (2016) Parameter optimization research on co-driver’s restraint system in vehicle frontal impacts. J Guangxi Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 5:1349–1357

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu XG, Lu JW (2014) Reliability-based robust assessment for multi-objective optimization design of improving occupant restraint system. Comput Ind 65(8):1169–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu XG, Sun GY, Li GY, Huang XD, Li YC, Li Q (2013) Multi-objective optimization design for vehicle occupant restraint system under frontal impact. Struct Multidisc Optim 47(3):465–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu XG, Dai JH, Huang XD, Li GY (2017) Reliable optimisation design of vehicle structure crashworthiness under multiple impact cases. Int J Crashworthiness 22:26–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han X (2015) Design theory and method based on numerical simulation. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Horii H (2018) Vehicle occupant restraint system design under uncertainty by using multi-objective robust design optimization. Int J Comput Methods Exp Meas 6(4):827–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou J, Tomas J, Sparke L (1995) Optimization of driver-side airbag and restraint system by occupant dynamics simulation. SAE Paper 952703

  • Hu YZ, Zeng BQ, Xie SG (2011) Vehicle safety simulation and analysis based on Ls-DYNA and HyperWorks. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu JW, Shi XN, Rupp JD, Reed MP, Klein KF, Cao LB (2013) Why older, obese, and female occupants are vulnerable in motor-vehicle crashes? In: The 16th conference of automotive safety technology, 2013, Hangzhou, pp 399–412

  • Huang Y, Zhou Q, Zhang X, Wang C (2015) Optimization study of occupant restraint system concerning variations in occupant size and crash severity in frontal collisions. Int J Veh Saf 8(4):299–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang C, Han X, Li D (2012) A new interval comparison relation and application in interval number programming for uncertain problems. CMC Comput Mater Contin 27(3):275–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang C, Han X, Xie HC (2017) Interval uncertainty optimization design theory and method. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan FC, Cai ZH, Chen JQ, Ma ZW (2012) Biomechanical responses and injury evaluation of human thorax and abdomen during vehicle collision. J South China Univ Technol (Nat Sci Ed) 40(12):70–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Li ZG, Zhang JY, Lai QX, Ma CS (2011) Development and optimization of a new occupant restraint system for improving mini vehicle safety. In: First international conference on transportation information and safety, 2011, Wuhan, vol 3, pp 1981–1988

  • Li L, Duan DW, Liu SL, X L, Liu YB (2016) A research on the optimization of restraint system for the protection of occupants with different statures. Automot Eng 38(11):1312–1318

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu GP, Han X, Jiang C (2012) An efficient multi-objective optimization approach based on the micro genetic algorithm and its application. Int J Mech Mater Des 8(1):37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Fu Q, Yin LR, Zhang ZY (2018) Multi-objective uncertainty optimization of occupant restraint system. Automot Eng 40(5):521–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu QM, Wu XF, Han X, Liu J, Zhang ZY, Guo SJ (2020) Sensitivity analysis and interval multi-objective optimization for an occupant restraint system considering craniocerebral injury. J Mech Des 142(2):024502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv XJ, Gu XG, He LG, Zhou DY, Liu WG (2015) Reliability design optimization of vehicle front-end structure for pedestrian lower extremity protection under multiple impact cases. Thin Walled Struct 94:500–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni BY, Jiang C, Han X (2016) An improved multidimensional parallelepiped non-probabilistic model for structural uncertainty analysis. Appl Math Model 40(7–8):4727–4745

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ni BY, Jiang C, Huang ZL (2018) Discussions on non-probabilistic convex modelling for uncertain problems. Appl Math Model 59:54–85

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Noma K, Miyajima Y, Kasai T, Otani A, Horii H (2006) 420 Design of occupant restraint system with multi objective robust design optimization. In: The proceedings of the computational mechanics conference, 2006, vol 19, pp 229–230

  • Qiu ZP (2003) Comparison of static response of structures using convex models and interval analysis method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 56(12):1735–1753

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rao A, Hassan J, Nusholtz G (2006) Effect of airbag porosity, mass flow and load limiter on the 5th and 50th hybrid dummies in a 35 mph crash. SAE Paper 2006–01–0677

  • Samaha RR, Prasad P, Nix L (2013) Development and validation of a Honda Accord MADYMO frontal occupant model. NCAC Working Paper. George Washington University: The National Crash Analysis Center

  • Sinha K (2007) Reliability-based multi-objective optimization for automotive crashworthiness and occupant safety. Struct Multidisc Optim 33(3):255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha K, Krishnan R, Raghavendra D (2007) Multi-objective robust optimization for crashworthiness during side impact. Int J Veh Des 43(1–4):116–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi G (1986) Introduction to quality engineering: designing quality into products and processes. Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu J, Choi KK, Park YH (1999) A new study on reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 121(4):557–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viano DC, Arepally S (1990) Assessing the safety performance of occupant restraint systems. SAE Trans 99(6):1913–1939

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C (2010) Design method and analysis for the configurations of adaptive occupant restraint system. Master's Degree Thesis, Tsinghua University, Beijing

  • Wang Q (2020) A robust design optimization method considering correlated intervals. Int J Comput Methods 17(10):1950079

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang RJ, Chuang C, Gu L, Li G (2005a) Experience with approximate reliability-based optimization method II: an exhaust system problem. Struct Multidisc Optim 29(6):488–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang RJ, Wang N, Tho CH, Bobineau JP, Wang BP (2005b) Metamodeling development for vehicle frontal impact simulation. J Mech Des 127(5):1014–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JK, Yang XM, Zhang CC (2011) Multi-objective optimization of child restraint system for vehicle side impact. J Mech Eng 47(12):79–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JY, Lin Y, Hua W, Zhang M (2004) Application of stochastic simulation to performance improvement of occupant restraint system. China Mech Eng 15(9):838–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Qiu S, Zhang J, Ma Y (2015) Define occupant restraint system characteristics by using two-step trapezoid method based on ride-down rate control in frontal impact. Int J Veh Saf 8(4):314–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou MH, Li A, Gu XG (2019) Reliability optimization design of occupant restraint system with the consideration of multiple impact cases. J Hefei Univ Technol (Nat Sci Ed) 42(7):888–894

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu XC (1998) Full-scale crash test and its evaluation. World Automob 5:11–13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51905165), the National Natural Science Foundation Innovation Research Group Project of China (Grant No. 51621004), and the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 2022JJ90003, 2021JJ30077, and 2022JJ40116).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhao Xiao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Replication of results

The utilized codes and data are available on request to enable the method proposed in the manuscript to be replicated by readers.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Erdem Acar

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Q., Liu, Z., Cao, L. et al. Multiobjective optimization design for an occupant restraint system considering interval correlation. Struct Multidisc Optim 65, 303 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03407-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03407-6

Keywords

Navigation