Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robust optimal design of tuned mass dampers for tall buildings with uncertain parameters

  • INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper a newly proposed approach to robust optimization is adopted in order to study the influence of uncertain structural parameters on the design of a passive control system The control devices are Tuned Mass Dampers placed on a tall building subjected to wind load. The uncertain structural variables are the floors’ mass and stiffness. The spatial variability of the mass over the floor’s surface is considered by ideally dividing each floor into a certain number of partitions in which the mass varies as a random variable. The robust optimization procedure is based on an enhanced Monte Carlo simulation technique and the genetic algorithm. The Latin Hypercube Sampling is employed to reduce the number of samples. The optimization of stiffnesses and dampings of the devices is carried out for each sample set of structural mass and stiffness matrices, allowing the evaluation of the probability distributions of the optimal parameters and the objective function. The robust designs are those having corresponding values of the objective function lying in the neighborhood of the expected value of the distribution The robust optimization is applied to a tall building controlled by a Tuned Mass Damper and subjected to wind loads obtained from wind tunnel tests. Several numerical analyses are carried out considering different numbers of surface partitions. Both the separate and joint influence of the mass and stiffness uncertainty is considered. The results show that the selected designs are robust, as they guarantee a small variability of structural performance caused by uncertainties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AIJ Recommendations for Loads on Buildings (2004) Commentary to Chapter 4. http://www.aij.or.jp/jpn/symposium/2006/loads/Chapter4_com.pdf

  • Andradottir S (1998) A review of simulation optimization techniques. In: Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, USA

  • Beyer HG, Sendhoff B (2007) Robust optimization - a comprehensive survey. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 196:3190–3218

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cacciola P, Muscolino G, Versaci C (2011) Deterministic and stochastic seismic analysis of buildings with uncertain-but-bounded mass distribution. Comp & Struct 89:2028–2036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro S, Bennis F, Wenger F (2005) Comparison of robustness indices and introduction of a tolerance synthesis method for mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the Canadian Congress of Applied Mechanics CANCAM, Montreal, Canada

  • Chakraborty S, Bhattacharjya S, Haldar A (2012) Sensitivity importance-based robust optimization of structures with incomplete probabilistic information. Int J Numer Meth Engng 90:1261–1277

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S H, Song M, Chen YD (2007) Robustness analysis of responses of vibration control structures with uncertain parameters using interval. algorithm Struct Saf 29:94–111

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cluni F, Gioffrè M, Gusella V (2013) Dynamic response of tall buildings to wind loads by reduced order equivalent shear-beam models. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 123:339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conn AR, Le Digabel S (2013) Use of quadratic models with mesh-adaptive direct search for constrained black box optimization. Optim Method Softw 28(1):139–158

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog J P (1956) Mechanical vibrations, McGraw Hill Book Company, New York

  • Doltsinis I, Kang Z (2004) Robust design of structures using optimization methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 193:2221–2237

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning, Addison Wesley Publishing Company

  • Huntington DE, Lyrintzis CS (1998) Improvements to and limitations of Latin Hypercube Sampling. Prob Engng Mech 13(4):245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang N, Fujino Y, Warnitchai P (2008) Optimal tuned mass damper for seismic applications and practical design formulas, vol 30, pp 707–715

  • Huang B, Du X (2007) Analytical robustness assessment for robust design. Struct Multidisc Optim 34(2):123–137

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Iman RL (2008) Latin Hypercube Sampling. Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Analysis and Assessment

  • Jensen HA (2006) Structural optimization of non-linear systems under stochastic excitation. Prob Engng Mech 21(4):397–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katafygiotis LS, Wang J (2009) Reliability analysis of wind-excited structures using domain decomposition method and line sampling. Struct Eng Mech 32(1):37–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavan O, Daniel Y (2013) Full resources utilization seismic design of irregular structures using multiple tuned mass dampers. Struct Multidisc Optim 48:517–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KH, Park GJ (2001) Robust optimization considering tolerances of design variables. Comput Struct 79(1):77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H-S, Au S-K (2010) Design optimization using subset simulation algorithm. Struct Saf 32(6):384–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marano GC, Greco R, Sgobba S (2010) A comparison between different robust optimum design approaches: application to tuned mass dampers. Prob Engng Mech 25:108–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marano GC, Quaranta G, Greco R (2009) Multi-objective optimization by genetic algorithm of structural systems subject to random vibrations. Struct Multidisc Optim 39:385–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno CP, Thomson P (2010) Design of an optimal tuned mass damper for a system with parametric uncertainty. Ann Oper Res 181:783–793

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Joint Committee on Structural Safety (2001) JCSS Probabilistic Model Code. Part II: Load models. ISBN 978-3-909386-79-6

  • Schueller GI, Jensen HA (2008) Computational methods in optimization considering uncertainties - An overview. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 198:2–13

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Venanzi I, Materazzi AL (2007) Multi-objective optimization of wind-excited structures. Eng Struct 99(6):983–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venanzi I, Materazzi AL (2012) Acrosswind aeroelastic response of square tall buildings: a semi-analytical approach based of wind tunnel tests on rigid models. Wind & Struct 15(6):495–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venanzi I, Materazzi AL (2013) Robust optimization of a hybrid control system for wind-exposed tall buildings with uncertain mass distribution. Smart Struct Syst 12:641–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venanzi I, Ubertini F, Materazzi A L (2013) Optimal design of an array of active tuned mass dampers for wind-exposed high-rise buildings. Struct Contr Health Monit 20:903–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton G B (1982) Optimum absorber parameters for various combination of response and excitation parameters. Earthq Eng Struc 10:381–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H (2012) Interval importance sampling method for finite element-based structural reliability assessment under parameter uncertainties. Struct Saf 38:1–10

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilaria Venanzi.

Appendix A Latin Hypercube Sampling

Appendix A Latin Hypercube Sampling

The Latin Hypercube sampling is a well-known technique used to efficiently sample variables from their multivariate distributions.

Let N denote the number of realizations and p the number of random variables [m 1,m 2,...,m p]. The sample space is then p-dimensional. To generate N samples from p variables with probability density function \(f\left (m \right )\), the procedure is as follows. The range of each variable is subdivided into N non overlapping intervals of equal probability 1/N. From each interval one value is selected at random according to the probability density of the interval. The current practice is to choose samples directly from the cumulative distribution function:

$$ m_{j,i} =F_{j}^{-1} \left( {\frac{i-0.5}{N}} \right) $$
(19)

where m j,i is the i-th sample of the j-th random variable m j , \(F_{j}^{-1}\) is the inverse cumulative distribution of the variable m j . In order to account for the correlations between the random variables, the samples of each random variable are permuted to match the target covariance matrix.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Venanzi, I. Robust optimal design of tuned mass dampers for tall buildings with uncertain parameters. Struct Multidisc Optim 51, 239–250 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1129-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1129-4

Keywords

Navigation