Skip to main content
Log in

On forcing over \(L(\mathbb {R})\)

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given that \(L(\mathbb {R})\models {\text {ZF}}+ {\text {AD}}+{\text {DC}}\), we present conditions under which one can generically add new elements to \(L(\mathbb {R})\) and obtain a model of \({\text {ZF}}+ {\text {AD}}+{\text {DC}}\). This work is motivated by the desire to identify the smallest cardinal \(\kappa \) in \(L(\mathbb {R})\) for which one can generically add a new subset \(g\subseteq \kappa \) to \(L(\mathbb {R})\) such that \(L(\mathbb {R})(g)\models {\text {ZF}}+ {\text {AD}}+{\text {DC}}\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Theorem 15.3 of [7] implies that forcing over a partially ordered set of size strictly less than a regular cardinal, will preserve the regular cardinal.

References

  1. Kechris, A.S.: The axiom of determinacy implies dependent choices in \({L(\mathbb{R} )}\). J. Symb. Log. 49, 161–173 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan, W., Jackson, S.: The destruction of the axiom of determinacy by forcings on \(\mathbb{R} \) when \({\Theta }\) is regular. Isr. J. Math. 241(1), 119–138 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-021-2090-8

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Kanamori, A.: The Higher Infinite. Large Cardinals in Set Theory from Their Beginnings, p. 536. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, C.C., Keisler, H.J.: Model Theory, vol. 73, 3rd edn., p. 650. North-Holland, Amsterdam and New York (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cunningham, D.W.: The real core model and its scales. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 72(3), 213–289 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Steel, J.R., Van Wesep, R.: Two consequences of determinacy consistent with choice. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 272, 67–85 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Jech, T.: Set Theory, The third millennium, edition revised and, expanded, p. 69. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel W. Cunningham.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cunningham, D.W. On forcing over \(L(\mathbb {R})\). Arch. Math. Logic 62, 359–367 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-022-00844-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-022-00844-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation