Abstract
This paper delves into the intricate relationship between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the art ecosystem, emphasizing the need for a decolonizing approach in the face of AI's growing influence. It argues that the development of AI is not just a technological leap but also a significant cultural and societal moment, akin to the advent of moving images that Walter Benjamin famously analyzed. The paper examines how AI, particularly in its current oligarchical and corporate-driven form, perpetuates and magnifies the existing social inequalities, thereby necessitating a critical and radical rethinking of its role in society and the arts. At the heart of the discussion is the concept of AI as a broad term encompassing various forms of machine intelligence, from natural language processing to computer vision. The paper criticizes the dominant anthropocentric view of intelligence and creativity, proposing a more inclusive approach that considers the diverse forms of intelligence present in other species and potentially in AI itself. It underscores the role of AI in shaping the art ecosystem, not just in the creative process but also in gatekeeping and decision-making. The paper proposes a framework for decolonizing AI in the art ecosystem, focusing on four key tasks: recognizing access as a form of power, understanding and addressing biases inherent in AI, assessing the impact of AI on marginalized communities, and challenging dominant narratives and epistemologies to create space for alternative voices and perspectives. It emphasizes the need for artists and the art community to engage actively with AI, shaping its development towards more equitable and just outcomes. In conclusion, the paper calls for a radical reimagination of AI's role in society and the arts, advocating for a future where AI is not just about technological advancement but also about fostering a more inclusive, equitable, and creatively diverse world. It invites artists, thinkers, and innovators to join in this journey of reimagining and reshaping the future of AI and the art ecosystem.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The authors declare that [the/all other] data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
References
Another AI in Art (2019) ‘2019 Another AI in Art Summit Catalog’. Retrieved from https://www.anotherai.art/about
Baeza-Yates R (2018) Bias in web data and use taints the algorithms behind web-based applications, delivering equally biased results. Commun ACM 61(6):54–61
Baradaran A, Brielmaier I (2019) Augmenting empathy and decolonizing AR/VR mediums: how do we reimagine augmented and virtual reality experiences? In: Gokcigdem E (ed) Designing for empathy: perspectives on the museum experience. Rowman & Littlefield
Bennett J (2010) Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Duke University Press, Durham
Beras E (2020) When AI misclassified her face, she started a movement for accountability. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/lists/innovators-under-35/2018/pioneer/joy-buolamwini/
Braidotti R (2017) Posthuman critical theory. J Posthuman Stud 1(1):9–25
Brielmaier I (ed) (2018) Accelerator series: technology, visual culture, and politics of representation. Skidmore College, The Francis Young Tang Teaching Museum and Art Gallery, Saratoga Springs, New York
Broussard M (2018) Artificial intelligence: how computers misunderstand the world. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Deleuze G (1992) Postscript on the societies of control. October 59:3–7
Edmonds E (2010) The art of interaction. Digit Creativity 21(4):257–264
Eubanks V (2015) Automating inequality: how high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press, New York
Feenberg A, Beira E (eds) (2018) Technology, modernity, and democracy. Rowman & Littlefield, New York
Halberstam J, Livingston I (eds) (1995) Posthuman bodies. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN
Hardt M, Negri A (2000) Empire. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Hayles NK (1999) How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kaleagasi B (2020) A new AI can write music as well as a human composer: the future of art hangs in the balance. Retrieved from https://futurism.com/a-new-ai-can-write-music-as-well-as-a-human-composer
Lewis S (2020) Racial bias in photography. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/25/lens/sarah-lewis-racial-bias-photography.html
Massumi B (1995) The autonomy of affect. Cult Crit 31:83–109. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354446
Mignolo W (2011) The darker side of Western modernity: global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press, Durham
Noble S (2018) Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press, New York
O’Neil C (2016) Weapons of math destruction: how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Broadway Books, New York
Popper F (2007) From technological to virtual art. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Russell S, Norvig P (2003) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey (ISBN 0-13-790395-2)
Tell Me More Staff (2020) Light and dark, the racial biases that remain in photography. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2014/04/16/303721251/light-and-dark-the-racial-biases-that-remain-in-photography
Tsukayama H (2020) Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/07/08/pokemon-gos-unexpected-side-effect-injuries/
Ngũgĩ wa Thiongʼo (1986) Decolonising the mind: the politics of language in African literature. J. Currey, London
Wachter-Boettcher S (2017) Technically wrong: sexist apps, biased algorithms, and other threats of toxic tech. W.W. Norton & Company, New York
Watney C (2019) A framework for increasing competition and diffusion in artificial intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.rstreet.org/2019/03/21/a-framework-for-increasing-competition-and-diffusion-in-artificial-intelligence/
Zakardakis G (2015) In our own image: Savior or destroyer? The history and future of artificial intelligence. Pegasus Book, New York
Acknowledgements
This special issue was produced with support from Denton Callander, Joshua Tendler, Ikaika Ramones, Farbod Honarpisheh, Isolde Brielmaier, George Zarkadakis, Steven Feiner, and Debora Giannone. I also acknowledge the generous support of the Canada Council for the Arts, The Knight Foundation, and the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences as well as the School of the Arts at Columbia University. Finally, I am sincerely grateful for the gift of company, time, and space that I had the privilege of enjoying alongside a special cohort of writers and practitioners focusing on AI during a month-long residency at the Rockefeller Foundation Bellagio Center (October 2019). Writing this chapter was only possible with these people and organizations. Finally, special thanks to Karamjit Gill and Victoria Vesna, who believed in the necessity of and provided the space for publishing a special issue on this topic. A version of this essay first appeared in Culture as Catalyst, edited by Isolde Brielmaier and published by The Frances Young Tang Teaching Museum and Art Gallery at Skidmore College in 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Baradaran, A. Towards a decolonial I in AI: mapping the pervasive effects of artificial intelligence on the art ecosystem. AI & Soc 39, 7–19 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01771-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01771-5