Skip to main content
Log in

Utilizing Facebook for professional integration of three ethnic groups in Israel

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study proposes a conceptual model for utilization of Facebook for professional integration of ethnic minorities, based on the social capital and weak social ties theories. In particular, the research focuses on differences among ethnic groups of Facebook users in their willingness to create intergroup work relations and its various influence factors. A designated questionnaire was composed and administered to 120 subjects from three ethnic groups in Israel: Jewish, Muslim-Arab and Druze. We found that the proportion of intergroup professional relations was higher on Facebook than in the offline workspace in all three groups. There were numerous differences between the three examined groups: self-disclosure was significantly higher for Druze and Jewish users than for the Arab users, while the willingness to create intergroup professional connections was much higher for the two minorities than for the Jewish users. This study contributes to understanding the factors that influence social network behaviour of different ethnic groups. Our results indicate that social networking sites can catalyse creation of intergroup professional relations. Utilization of social networking sites as a platform for professional promotion might constitute a first step in the process of professional and cultural integration of minorities in the ethnically heterogeneous society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The study’s data are available.

References

  • Abbas R, Mesch GS (2015) Cultural values and Facebook use among Palestinian youth in Israel. Comput Hum Behav 48:644–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acikgoz Y, Bergman SM (2016) Social media and employee recruitment: chasing the runaway bandwagon. Social media in employee selection and recruitment. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, pp 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29989-1_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aharony N (2016) Relationships among attachment theory, social capital perspective, personality characteristics, and Facebook self-disclosure. Aslib J Inf Manag 68(3):362–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Omoush KS, Yaseen SG, Alma’Aitah MA (2012) The impact of Arab cultural values on online social networking: the case of Facebook. Comput Hum Behav 28(6):2387–2399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Rawi A (2019) Facebook and virtual nationhood: social media and the Arab Canadians community. AI Soc 34:559–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0742-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batenburg A, Bartels J (2017) Keeping up online appearances: how self-disclosure on Facebook affects perceived respect and likability in the professional context. Comput Hum Behav 74(2017):265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battu H, Seaman P, Zenou Y (2011) Job contact networks and the ethnic minorities. Labour Econ 18(1):48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessi A, Ferrara E (2016) Social bots distort the 2016 US Presidential election online discussion. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i11.7090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P, Wacquant L (1992) An invitation to reflexive sociology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnert D, Ross WH (2010) The influence of social networking web sites on the evaluation of job candidates. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 13(3):341–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonini T (2011) The media as ‘home-making’ tools: life story of a Filipino migrant in Milan. Media Cult Soc 33:869–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandimarte L, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2013) Misplaced confidences: privacy and the control paradox. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 4(3):340–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612455931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff J (2009) Digital diasporas: identity and transnational engagement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein J (2014) Creating possible selves: information disclosure behaviour on social networks. Inf Res Int Electron J 19(1):n1

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt RS (2000) The network structure of social capital. Res Organiz Behav 22:345–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardon PW, Marshall B, Choi J, El-Shinnaway MM, North M, Svensson L et al (2009) Online and offline social ties of social network website users: an exploratory study in eleven societies. J Comput Inf Syst 50(1):54–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson M, Eriksson S, Rooth DO (2018) Job search methods and wages: are natives and immigrants different? Manch Sch 86(2):219–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Bureau of Statistics (2018). Population by religion. https://old.cbs.gov.il/shnaton69/st02_02.pdf. Accessed Dec 2020

  • Chang J, Rosenn I, Backstrom L, Marlow C (2010) ePluribus: ethnicity on social networks. ICWSM 10:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christofides E, Muise A, Desmarais S (2009) Information disclosure and control on Facebook: are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? Cyberpsychol Behav 12(3):341–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christofides E, Muise A, Desmarais S (2011) Hey mom, what’s on your Facebook? Comparing Facebook disclosure and privacy in adolescents and adults. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 3(1):48–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortina JM (1993) What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol 78(1):98–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne DP, Marlowe D (1960) A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Psychol 24(4):349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Ouirdi M, Segers J, El Ouirdi A, Pais I (2015) Predictors of job seekers’ self-disclosure on social media. Comput Hum Behav 53:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganayim A, Assad H, Tibi VM (2011) The use of social networks among Arab youth. JAMA 15:210–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee LK, Jones J, Burke M (2017) Social networks and labor markets: how strong ties relate to job finding on Facebook’s social network. J Labor Econ 35(2):485–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter MS (1995) Getting a job: a study of contacts and careers. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell SA, Scholarios D, Richards J (2017) ‘The kids are alert’: generation Y responses to employer use and monitoring of social networking sites. New Technol Work Employ 32(1):64–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluemper HD, Rosen AP (2009) Future employment selection methods: evaluating social networking web sites. J Manag Psychol 24(6):567–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khattab N, Miaari S (2013) The occupational mismatch amongst Palestinians and Jews in Israel: a new evidence from the LFS 2000–2010. Res Soc Stratif Mobil 34:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattab N, Lazarus A (2016) Overqualification and wage penalties among immigrants, native minorities, and majority ethnic groups. Socioeconomic inequality in Israel. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 123–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi T (2001) Good friends in bad times? Social networks and job search among the unemployed in Sweden. Acta Sociol 44:157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesser EL (2000) Leveraging social capital in organizations. Knowl Soc Cap Found Appl 3:16

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyva R, Beckett C (2020) Testing and unpacking the effects of digital fake news: on presidential candidate evaluations and voter support. AI Soc 35:969–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00980-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin-Epstein N, Kelb A, Marantz A, Slonim S (2015) The integration of Arab pharmacists into the labor market in Israel. Policy Paper No. 3. Jerusalem: Taub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel

  • Lissitsa S, Chachashvili-Bolotin S, Bokek-Cohen YA (2017) Can digital skills raise occupational prestige among ethnic minorities? Innov Eur J Soc Sci Res 30(2):204–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melanthiou Y, Pavlou F, Constantinou E (2015) The use of social network sites as an e-recruitment tool. J Transnatl Manag 20(1):31–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosko A, Wood E, Molema S (2010) All about me: disclosure in online social networking profiles: the case of Facebook. Comput Hum Behav 26(3):406–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory 3:248–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollington N, Gibb J, Harcourt M (2013) Online social networks: an emergent recruiter tool for attracting and screening. Pers Rev 42(3):248–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike JC, Bateman PJ, Butler BS (2018) Information from social networking sites: context collapse and ambiguity in the hiring process. Inf Syst J 28(4):729–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porat E, Blau I, Barak A (2018) Measuring digital literacies: perceived versus actual competencies of junior high-school students. Comput Educ 126:23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Culture and politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 223–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnell I, Haj-Yahya N (2014) Arab integration in Jewish-Israeli social space: does commuting make a difference? Urban Geogr 35(7):1084–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenhav Y, Dalash M, Avnimelech R, Mizrachi N, Mendel Y (2015) Knowledge of Arabic among Jews in Israel. Published by the Van Leer Institute

  • Semyonov M, Glikman A (2008) Ethnic residential segregation, social contacts, and anti-minority attitudes in European societies. Eur Sociol Rev 25(6):693–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Zhu X, Liu B, Li L (2018) Social networks and the wages of job seekers: the case of China. Soc Netw Anal Min 8(1):51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutzman F, Gross R, Acquisti A (2013) Silent listeners: the evolution of privacy and disclosure on Facebook. J Priv Confid 4(2):7–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Taraszow T, Aristodemou E, Shitta G, Laouris Y, Arsoy A (2010) Disclosure of personal and contact information by young people in social networking sites: an analysis using Facebook profiles as an example. Int J Media Cult Polit 6(1):81–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trepte S, Reinecke L (2013) The reciprocal effects of social network site use and the disposition for self-disclosure: a longitudinal study. Comput Hum Behav 29(3):1102–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck J (2013) ‘You have one identity’: performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn. Media Cult Soc 35(2):199–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck J (2014) Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveill Soc 12(2):197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitak J (2012) The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. J Broadcast Electron Media 56:451–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger M, Bouhnik D, Zhitomirsky-Geffet M (2017) Factors affecting students’ privacy paradox and privacy protection behavior. Open Inf Sci 1(1):3–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2017-0002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yashiv A, Kasir V (2013) The overview of characteristics and policy alternatives of the Israeli Arab Labor Market. Tel Aviv University, Faculty of Social Sciences - Department of Public Policy

  • Zhitomirsky-Geffet M, Bratspiess Y (2015) Perceived effectiveness of social networks for job search. Libri 65(2):105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhitomirsky-Geffet M, Bratspiess Y (2016) Professional informationdisclosure on social networks: the case of Facebook and LinkedIn in Israel. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 67(3):193–204

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maayan Zhitomirsky-Geffet.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 1, 2 and 3.

1.1 Variable definition

To address the posed research questions, the dependent research variables were defined as follows:

  1. A.

    The degree of intragroup professional contacts on Facebook and in non-virtual space, as two separate variables, statements 1 and 2 in part C of the questionnaire. The respondent was asked to rate the percentage of the Facebook work-related friends who are members of his/her ethnic group out of the total number of his work-related friends on Facebook, with 0% indicating that all his friends are with members of other ethnic groups, and 100% indicating that all his friends are with members of his own group. Similarly, the percentage of professional contacts of the respondent in the non-virtual space was estimated. The two variables were examined at the categorical level, where the categories are less than a third of the connections, between one third and two thirds, more than a third, and all the connections.

  2. B.

    Preference to create professional relations with members of other groups, item 3 (statements a, b and the reversed value of responses to statement c) in Part C of the questionnaire. The answers are based on a Likert scale of 4 values, with 1 indicating disagree (preference to connect with members of the same ethnic group) and 4 indicating strongly agree (preference to connect with members of other ethnic groups). The value of Cronbach’s alpha was 0.867.

  3. C.

    Perception of the easiness of creating professional connections with members of other ethnic groups on SNS. Item 3 statement d in Part C of the questionnaire. The answers are based on a Likert scale of 4 values, with 1 indicating not at all and 4 indicating absolutely agree.

The following independent variables which reflect various influence factors of the dependent variables were defined in the study:

  1. A.

    Demographic variables, statements 1–10 in Part A of the questionnaire. Level of digital literacy, item al in Part D of the questionnaire. The score ranges from 1 (low digital literacy) to 4 (high digital literacy) with Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.866.

  2. B.

    Perception of job search through the Internet. Item 2a in Part D of the questionnaire. The score ranges from 1 to 4.

  3. C.

    The degree of preference for job search via the Internet. Item 2b in Part D of the questionnaire. The score ranges from 1 to 4.

  4. D.

    Frequency of use of SNS, items 2 and 5 in Part B of the questionnaire. The variable was examined at the categorical level, with the categories of 30 days or more, 28–20 days, 15–8 days and less than 7 days per month.

  5. E.

    Number of hours of daily use of Facebook, item 9 in Part B of the questionnaire. The variable was examined at the categorical level, with categories up to 1 h a day, more than 1–2 h, more than 2–5 h, and 5 h of daily use.

  6. F.

    Professional reasons for joining Facebook, items 3 and 6 in Part B of the questionnaire. The categorical variable was divided into the following three groups: (1) job search; (2) professional activity (e.g. self-marketing, participation in a group related to the user’s professional development or receiving updates on professional content); (3) none of the above.

  7. G.

    Using Facebook as a job search tool, item 10 in Part B of the questionnaire.

  8. H.

    The extent to which Facebook was used as a job search tool in the past. Item 13 in Part B of the questionnaire.

  9. I.

    Future job search intentions on Facebook. Item 12 in Part B of the questionnaire.

  10. J.

    The perception of the effectiveness of Facebook for job search. Item 11 in Part B of the questionnaire.

For variables G, H, I, J above the scores range from 1 to 4.

  1. K.

    Disclosure of personal information on SNS—to friends only and to the public. Two separate variables were computed from Items 7 and 8 in Part B of the questionnaire, respectively. Respondents had to select any of the following details that they publish on Facebook: Full Name/Photo/Marital Status/Date of Birth/Current Place of Residence/Former Place of Residence/List of Friends/List of Common Friends, with the score ranging from 0 to 8.

  2. L.

    Disclosure of professional-employment information on social networks—to friends only and to the public. Items 7 and 8 in Part B of the questionnaire. Respondents had to select any of the following details that they disclosed on Facebook: Current place of work/position in the current workplace/past jobs/positions in the past workplace/an institution where you study/past institutions of study/academic training, with the score ranging from 0 to 8.

  3. M.

    Sharing professional contents on SNS. Item 9 in Part B of the questionnaire. Respondents had to select any of the following types of content that they share on Facebook: content related to job search/material related to your area of work/material related to your profession/material related to your place of work, with the score ranging from 0 to 4.

1.2 The Questionnaire

figure a
figure b
figure c
figure d

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M., Weic, A. Utilizing Facebook for professional integration of three ethnic groups in Israel. AI & Soc 36, 737–755 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01131-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01131-7

Keywords

Navigation